Post-operative Pain in 2Shape Versus Protaper Next Rotary Systems

NCT ID: NCT03694743

Last Updated: 2018-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-12-31

Study Completion Date

2020-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain after endodontic treatment is considered the most disturbing problem facing both the patient and the dentist especially in cases of symptomatic pulpitis as the patient is expecting to relief the pain that already exists.Therefore, this study aims to find a solution for the post-operative pain felt by the patient with symptomatic pulpitis in mandibular molars through comparing post-operative pain following use of 2Shape and Protaper Next rotary systems.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Root canal preparation is the most important step in endodontic treatment. For successful treatment, pulp tissue, dentin debris and microorganisms should be completely eradicated from the root canal system.However, it has been reported that all the instrumentation techniques (manual or mechanical) cause debris extrusion into the periradicular tissue resulting in periapical inflammation that causes post-operative pain and flare up.

Instrumentation technique and instrument design were found to be related to the amount of debris extruded which is the main cause of post-operative pain. It has been reported that rotary NiTi systems cause less debris extrusion than manual instrumentation.

Within NiTi systems, instrument design, taper and tip size were found to affect debris extrusion. Therefore, new innovations in the instrument designs are introduced in order to reduce post-operative pain and flare up incidence.

Therefore, this study is established to compare the effect of 2 different rotary systems on postoperative pain in patients with symptomatic pulpitis.

The aim of the present study is to assess the effect of rotary instrumentation using Protaper Next rotary system versus 2Shape rotary system on postoperative pain and the number of analgesics taken by the patient following single visit root canal treatment in mandibular molars with symptomatic pulpitis.

Primary objective:

Comparing the intensity of post-operative pain using Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) immediately after root canal treatment and post-appointment at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72hours.

Secondary objectives:

* The need for / and number of analgesic tablets taken within 3 days after end of endodontic treatment.
* Instrument separation during instrumentation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pulpitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

2Shape rotary system

root canal preparation using 2Shape rotary system in mandibular molars with symptomatic pulpitis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

2Shape rotary system

Intervention Type DEVICE

root canal preparation

Protaper Next rotary system

root canal preparation using Protaper Next rotary system comparing to 2Shape rotary system in mandibular molars with symptomatic pulpitis

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

2Shape rotary system

Intervention Type DEVICE

root canal preparation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

2Shape rotary system

root canal preparation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \- Medically free patients.
* Patients with symptomatic pulpitis in one of their mandibular molars.
* Patient's age ranges between 22 to 45 years with no sex predilection.
* Patients who can understand Numerical Analogue Scales (NRS).
* Patients able to sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Patients having a systemic disorder.
* Presence of periapical lesion.
* Pregnant females.
* Patients who had taken analgesics during the last 12 hours preoperatively.
* Patients having active pain in more than one tooth.
* Non- educated patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

22 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Heba Ibrahim Mohamady

Ass.lecturer of endodotics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

dentistry cairo

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.