Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial dIrect Current stiMulation in Multiple System Atrophy-Cerebellar Variant

NCT ID: NCT06821256

Last Updated: 2025-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-07-03

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial that aim to verify the safety and the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) cerebellar symptoms in Multiple System Atrophy type C (MSA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease for which, to date, no causal therapy is available, symptomatic treatment therefore playing a pivotal role in patient care (Fanciulli \& Wenning, 2015). Unfortunately, there are very limited effective symptomatic treatments, especially for the cerebellar variant of MSA (MSA-C) which calls for the urgent need of developing alternative strategies to improve patients' disability and quality of life (QoL). An emergent approach to cerebellar disorders of various etiologies stands in the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques (Erro R et al., 2017), namely in the use of trans-cranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), to modulates neuronal excitability in a polarity-specific manner by delivering prolonged (up to 20-30 min) but weak (1-2 mA) currents to brain tissues via electrodes placed on the scalp (Stagg \& Nitsche, 2011).

This project has been designed as a double-blinded, sham-controlled, cross-over trial with two independent arms to assess the feasibility and compare the efficacy of two different tDCS protocols. Sample size calculation has been calculated on preliminary unpublished results of our own research using tDCS in other atypical parkinsonisms (i.e., PSP) and we will accordingly recruit 15 patients for each arm of the study. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two arms and all will receive a sham-stimulation for 5 consecutive days/week (i.e.,Monday to Friday) and an active stimulation for 5 consecutive days/week (i.e., Monday to Friday). The order of the sham- vs active-stimulation will be also randomized within each arm. The active stimulation will consist of an anodal stimulation over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode. During anodal stimulation, a constant current of 2 mA will be applied for 20 minutes, as suggested by recently published consensus recommendations (Grimaldi et al, 2014). For the sham condition, the electrode placement will be the same as for the active stimulation, but the electric current will be ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation to make this condition indistinguishable from the experimental stimulation.

Before (T0), soon after the first week of the protocol (T1) and soon after the second week of the protocol (T2) all patients will be evaluated using 1) validated clinical scales for cerebellar disorders (SARA, ICARS) and 2) through the 8-m walking test (8MW); defined as the time needed to walk 8 m as quickly as possible but safely with any device but without the help of another person or wall. During the 8MW wearable sensors (OPAL) will be further used to collect objective measures of gait and balance. Finally, PROs will be collected by means of 1) the clinical global improvement measure (CGI-I) ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with patients being asked to report their perceived improvement at T1 and T2; and 2) by two instruments for depicting change in QoL, namely the EuroQoL-5Dimensions, 3Levels (EQ-5D-3L) and the MSA-QoL (Schrag, Mov Disord 2007), both of which will be performed at T0, T1 and T2. Patients will be further asked whether they thought they were receiving real or sham stimulation at the end of the 2-week treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple System Atrophy - Cerebellar Subtype (MSA-C)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two arms and all will receive a sham-stimulation for 5 consecutive days/week (i.e.,Monday to Friday) and an active stimulation for 5 consecutive days/week (i.e., Monday to Friday). The order of the sham- vs active-stimulation will be also randomized within each arm. The active stimulation will consist of an anodal stimulation over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode. During anodal stimulation, a constant current of 2 mA will be applied for 20 minutes, as suggested by recently published consensus recommendations (Grimaldi et al, 2014). For the sham condition, the electrode placement will be the same as for the active stimulation, but the electric current
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Randomiziation, monitoring and data management will be performed locally. Randomization will be performed using an online list randomizer (random.org). The study coordinator will generate the random allocation sequence before enrollment. Then, one sub-investigator will perform clinical evaluations and another one will administer the treatment.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Real tDCS group

Partecipants receive anodal tDCS over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode for 5 days/week for 2 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

tDCS is delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator throught a pair of saline soaked surface sponge electrodes. The active electrode (anode) is placed on the scalp over the over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode. Durng real stilumation a costant current of 2mA is applied for 20 minutes.

Sham group

Partecipants receive sham stimulation over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode for 5 days/week for 2 weeks

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

For the sham condition the electrode placement is the same of active tDCS but the electric current is ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS)

tDCS is delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator throught a pair of saline soaked surface sponge electrodes. The active electrode (anode) is placed on the scalp over the over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode. Durng real stilumation a costant current of 2mA is applied for 20 minutes.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham stimulation

For the sham condition the electrode placement is the same of active tDCS but the electric current is ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Active stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Multiple system atrophy cerebellar variant according with the Movemente Disorder Society criteria (Wenning et al 2022)
* Ability to walk either indipendently or with a minimum support

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of electrical stimulators (for example, pacemaker, Deep Brain Stimulation, DBS)
* Difficult in understanding Italian language
* Presence of severe sensory deficits (for example, visual or hearing impairments)
* History of drug abuse
* History of severe psychiatric disorders
* History of transient ischemic attacks
* Cortical or sub-cortical vascular lesions
* Seizures or severe heart problems and previous neurosurgical operations
* Pregnancy
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Salerno

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Roberto Erro

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centro per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEMAND) Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia, Sezione Neuroscienze, Università di Salerno

Salerno, Sa, Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Roberto Erro MD, PhD

Role: CONTACT

089673073

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Roberto Erro MD, PhD

Role: primary

089673073

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21343407 (View on PubMed)

Erro R, Antelmi E, Bhatia KP, Latorre A, Tinazzi M, Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Rocchi L. Reversal of Temporal Discrimination in Cervical Dystonia after Low-Frequency Sensory Stimulation. Mov Disord. 2021 Mar;36(3):761-766. doi: 10.1002/mds.28369. Epub 2020 Nov 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33159823 (View on PubMed)

Erro R, Tinazzi M, Morgante F, Bhatia KP. Non-invasive brain stimulation for dystonia: therapeutic implications. Eur J Neurol. 2017 Oct;24(10):1228-e64. doi: 10.1111/ene.13363. Epub 2017 Aug 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28782903 (View on PubMed)

Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D, Bikson M. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):201-7, 207.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20648973 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MSA-STIM 01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain Stimulation for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT02292589 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE2