Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial dIrect Current stiMulation in Multiple System Atrophy-Cerebellar Variant
NCT ID: NCT06821256
Last Updated: 2025-04-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-07-03
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Static Field Stimulation (tSMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for the Treatment of Neurological Symptoms.
NCT06900959
Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial dIrect Current stiMulation (tDCS) in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) (STIM-PSP)
NCT04655079
Can Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Improve Ambulation and Fatigue Resistance in People With MS?
NCT02987621
tDCS in MCS: Repeated Stimulations
NCT02019615
Direct Measurement of Motor Cortical Responses to tDCS
NCT04759898
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This project has been designed as a double-blinded, sham-controlled, cross-over trial with two independent arms to assess the feasibility and compare the efficacy of two different tDCS protocols. Sample size calculation has been calculated on preliminary unpublished results of our own research using tDCS in other atypical parkinsonisms (i.e., PSP) and we will accordingly recruit 15 patients for each arm of the study. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two arms and all will receive a sham-stimulation for 5 consecutive days/week (i.e.,Monday to Friday) and an active stimulation for 5 consecutive days/week (i.e., Monday to Friday). The order of the sham- vs active-stimulation will be also randomized within each arm. The active stimulation will consist of an anodal stimulation over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode. During anodal stimulation, a constant current of 2 mA will be applied for 20 minutes, as suggested by recently published consensus recommendations (Grimaldi et al, 2014). For the sham condition, the electrode placement will be the same as for the active stimulation, but the electric current will be ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation to make this condition indistinguishable from the experimental stimulation.
Before (T0), soon after the first week of the protocol (T1) and soon after the second week of the protocol (T2) all patients will be evaluated using 1) validated clinical scales for cerebellar disorders (SARA, ICARS) and 2) through the 8-m walking test (8MW); defined as the time needed to walk 8 m as quickly as possible but safely with any device but without the help of another person or wall. During the 8MW wearable sensors (OPAL) will be further used to collect objective measures of gait and balance. Finally, PROs will be collected by means of 1) the clinical global improvement measure (CGI-I) ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse), with patients being asked to report their perceived improvement at T1 and T2; and 2) by two instruments for depicting change in QoL, namely the EuroQoL-5Dimensions, 3Levels (EQ-5D-3L) and the MSA-QoL (Schrag, Mov Disord 2007), both of which will be performed at T0, T1 and T2. Patients will be further asked whether they thought they were receiving real or sham stimulation at the end of the 2-week treatment.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Real tDCS group
Partecipants receive anodal tDCS over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode for 5 days/week for 2 weeks
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS)
tDCS is delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator throught a pair of saline soaked surface sponge electrodes. The active electrode (anode) is placed on the scalp over the over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode. Durng real stilumation a costant current of 2mA is applied for 20 minutes.
Sham group
Partecipants receive sham stimulation over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode for 5 days/week for 2 weeks
Sham stimulation
For the sham condition the electrode placement is the same of active tDCS but the electric current is ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS)
tDCS is delivered by a battery-driven constant current stimulator throught a pair of saline soaked surface sponge electrodes. The active electrode (anode) is placed on the scalp over the over the cerebellum area (2 cm under the inion, using a 7 × 5 cm sponge electrode), with the cathode being applied either to the right deltoid muscle (arm 1: cerebellar stimulation) or over the spinal lumbar enlargement (2 cm under T11; arm 2: cerebellar-spinal stimulation) using a sponge electrode of the same size as the anode. Durng real stilumation a costant current of 2mA is applied for 20 minutes.
Sham stimulation
For the sham condition the electrode placement is the same of active tDCS but the electric current is ramped down 5 seconds after the beginning of the stimulation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Ability to walk either indipendently or with a minimum support
Exclusion Criteria
* Difficult in understanding Italian language
* Presence of severe sensory deficits (for example, visual or hearing impairments)
* History of drug abuse
* History of severe psychiatric disorders
* History of transient ischemic attacks
* Cortical or sub-cortical vascular lesions
* Seizures or severe heart problems and previous neurosurgical operations
* Pregnancy
40 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Salerno
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Roberto Erro
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Centro per le Malattie Neurodegenerative (CEMAND) Dipartimento di Medicina e chirurgia, Sezione Neuroscienze, Università di Salerno
Salerno, Sa, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist. 2011 Feb;17(1):37-53. doi: 10.1177/1073858410386614.
Erro R, Antelmi E, Bhatia KP, Latorre A, Tinazzi M, Berardelli A, Rothwell JC, Rocchi L. Reversal of Temporal Discrimination in Cervical Dystonia after Low-Frequency Sensory Stimulation. Mov Disord. 2021 Mar;36(3):761-766. doi: 10.1002/mds.28369. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
Erro R, Tinazzi M, Morgante F, Bhatia KP. Non-invasive brain stimulation for dystonia: therapeutic implications. Eur J Neurol. 2017 Oct;24(10):1228-e64. doi: 10.1111/ene.13363. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
Datta A, Bansal V, Diaz J, Patel J, Reato D, Bikson M. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2009 Oct;2(4):201-7, 207.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2009.03.005.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MSA-STIM 01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.