Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Walking in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT ID: NCT03757819
Last Updated: 2022-12-21
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
12 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-25
2019-07-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The study is to examine the efficacy of different tDCS protocols at improving walking in PwMS. Although the details of the studies slightly vary, the global aspects of the experimental procedures are identical with the exception that the tDCS stimulation parameter timing differs between the groups. The study will be double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized cross-over design.
Maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the right and left knee extensors, knee flexors, hip flexors, and dorsiflexors will be performed to determine the more-affected leg.
The study compromises 2 groups of subjects which will attend the lab for three sessions. In the first session subjects will be consented, complete the PDDS, the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and a 6 minute walk test (6-MWT) for baseline performance. The second session will involve a 6 MWT performed in association with 2 conditions. Group 1: DURINGtDCS, DURINGSHAM. Group 2: BEFOREtDCS, BEFORESHAM. The conditions in each group will be in a randomized order. Intensity of tDCS will be 2mA for both groups. Group 1 will receive the conditions during the 6 MWT. tDCS for 6 min has been shown to be sufficient to induce cortical excitability. Group 2 will receive 13 min of tDCS or sham, which results in after effects lasting through the completion of the 6 MWT. tDCS will be applied to the motor cortex (M1) corresponding to the more-affected leg either before or during the 6 min walk test
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study compromises 2 groups of subjects which will attend the lab for three sessions. In the first session subjects will be consented, complete the Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) questionnaire, the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), and a 6MWT for baseline performance. The second session will involve a 6 MWT performed in association with 2 conditions. Group 1: DURING\_tDCS, DURING\_SHAM. Group 2: BEFORE\_tDCS, BEFORE\_SHAM. tDCS will be applied first follwed by SHAM in each group. Intensity of tDCS will be 2mA for both groups. Group 1 will receive the conditions during the 6 MWT. tDCS for 6 min has been shown to be sufficient to induce cortical excitability. Group 2 will receive 13 min of tDCS or sham which results in after effects lasting through the completion of the 6MWT. tDCS will be applied to the motor cortex (M1)corresponding to the more-affected leg either before or during the 6 min walk test. Leg strength, 6 MWT, and tDCS: Maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) of the right and left knee extensors, knee flexors, hip flexors, and dorsiflexors will be performed to determine the more-affected leg. When leg strength difference is less than 10%, the more affected side will be based on self-report. For the 6 MWT, participants will be asked to walk as far as they can in 6 minutes. The 6 MWT is well established in MS research and, in order to measure fatigability as a secondary outcome, the literature suggest using a 6MWT rather than a 2MWT.Participants will walk in a cordoned off hallway between two cones placed approximately 30 meters apart. The primary outcome measure will be the distance covered in the 6 MWT. Since the investigators hypothesize that tDCS will alter the utilization of their more-affected leg, standard gait metrics during the 6MWT including gait speed, cadence, stride length and time, step length and time will be assessed with inertial sensors (OPAL system) for tDCS and SHAM (secondary outcomes). Furthermore, the investigators will calculate the distance walked index (DWI, distance Min 1 - distance Min 6), which is an objective measure of fatigability. A tDCS device (ActivaDose II) will deliver a small direct current through two sponge surface electrodes (5cm × 5cm,soaked with 15 mM NaCL). The positive electrode will be placed over the motor cortex representation of the more affected leg, and a second electrode will be placed on the forehead above the contralateral orbit. The following sessions will be performed in randomized order. Group 1 (During) - (A) The participant will receive tDCS or SHAM throughout the walking. In the tDCS trial the intensity will start at 0 mA and will be increased to 2mA over a 30 second period of time. At the 6:30 minute time point (immediately after walking) the current will gradually be reduced from 2 mA to 0 mA. (B) In the sham condition the participants will only receive the initial 30 seconds of stimulation, after which the current will be set to 0. Group 2 (Before) - (C) After a 30s ramp-up, tDCS will be delivered for 13 minutes at an intensity of 2 mA before the 6 min walk test. At the 13:00 minute time point the current will gradually be reduced from 2 mA to 0 mA. (D) Participants who undergo a sham condition will only receive the initial 30 seconds of ramp-up, after which the current will be set to 0 (D). In session 3, the condition not performed during session 2 will be performed. E.g., if a patient in Group 1 was randomly assigned DURING\_SHAM for session 2, the patient will perform DURING\_tDCS in session 3. All other testing conditions will be the same as session 2.
There will be no long-term follow up.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SEQUENTIAL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Before Walking tDCS first then SHAM
To investigate the effects of tDCS applied before walking versus during to evaluate effectiveness of the intervention.
tDCS
Brain Stimulation
SHAM
Placebo device
During Walking tDCS first then SHAM
To investigate the effects of tDCS applied before walking versus during to evaluate effectiveness of the intervention.
tDCS
Brain Stimulation
SHAM
Placebo device
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
tDCS
Brain Stimulation
SHAM
Placebo device
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* moderate disability (Patient Determined Disease Steps (PDDS) core 2-6), -self-- reported differences in function between legs, able to walk for 6min. -
Exclusion Criteria
* high risk for cardiovascular disease (ACSM risk classification),
* changes in disease modifying medications within last 45 days,
* concurrent neurological/neuromuscular disease,
* hospitalization within last 90 days,
* diagnosed depression, inability to understand/sign informed consent.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thorsten Rudroff
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thorsten Rudroff
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thorsten Rudroff
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Iowa
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Workman CD, Kamholz J, Rudroff T. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) to Improve Gait in Multiple Sclerosis: A Timing Window Comparison. Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Nov 28;13:420. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00420. eCollection 2019.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201810705
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id