Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Lower Neuropathic Pain in People With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT ID: NCT03219073
Last Updated: 2022-11-29
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-01
2018-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This will be the first study to determine the effects of tDCS on whole and regional brain activity in PwMS with neuropathic pain to identify potential mechanisms of the analgesic effects of tDCS. These findings will provide targets for future studies investigating different stimulation areas, possible short- and long-term side effects, and specific target areas for other precise stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Walking in Multiple Sclerosis
NCT03757819
tDCS to Lower Neuropathic Pain and Fatigue in People With Multiple Sclerosis
NCT03870048
Transcranial Static Field Stimulation (tSMS) and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) for the Treatment of Neurological Symptoms.
NCT06900959
tDCS for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis Related Fatigue
NCT03838770
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02768129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will follow an interventional protocol with two groups. Upon enrollment into the study, all participants will undergo testing for the outcome measures described above. Each participant will then be randomly assigned into the SHAM or tDCS group for the study intervention. This study will be completed over the course of 6 consecutive days and 1 follow-up phone call 1 week after the final testing for each participant (total of 13 days).
Two age and sex matched groups, each n =8, will receive either tDCS or SHAM stimulation.
All of the following measures will be performed before and after the tDCS or SHAM intervention.
Fluorodeoxyglucose (\[18F\] FDG) - Whole and regional brain FDG uptake will be measured to determine the mechanistic effect of tDCS on brain activity.
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - The VAS is a self-evaluation scale where the participant is asked to mark a segment that ranges from 0-100 as visually described in millimeter units where 0 mm indicates no pain and 100 mm indicates the worst possible pain. This scale has been widely used in studies that evaluated pain as an outcome measure: both validity and reproducibility have been demonstrated.
VAS for Anxiety - This is a self-evaluation scale that ranges from 0 to 100 mm: 0 mm indicates no anxiety and 100 mm indicates the worst possible anxiety.
Prior to beginning the 2nd-5th tDCS sessions, the effectiveness of tDCS will be assessed using the following procedures:
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Each participant will be asked how effective the previous day's tDCS session was at reducing their pain by marking a segment on the range of 0-100 as visually described in millimeter units where 0 mm indicates no reduction in pain and 100 mm indicates complete alleviation of pain.
Duration of Relief - If the participant indicates any reduction in pain following the previous day's tDCS session, the participant will be asked to estimate how long the participant's pain was reduced following the session.
One week following the post-intervention testing, participants will be contacted via telephone and asked the following questions:
1. Was tDCS effective at reducing the participant's pain?
2. If so, how long did the participant notice a reduction in pain following the participant's final tDCS session?
3. Have the participants reduced their use of pain relieving medications since the last tDCS session?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SHAM tDCS
SHAM tDCS using tDCS device will be used for sham stimulation where the electrodes will be placed in the same positions as for anodal M1 stimulation, but the stimulator will be turned off after 90 seconds. Therefore, the patients feel the initial itching sensation but receive no current for the rest of the stimulation period.
SHAM tDCS using tDCS device
SHAM tDCS emulates active tDCS in all but the actual stimulation. Electrodes of the tDCS device are placed in the same place as with active tDCS however no current is activated.
Active tDCS with a tDCS device
Active tDCS using tDCS device (Neuroelectrics Inc., Simi Valley, CA, USA) will deliver a small direct current through two sponge surface electrodes (5cm × 5cm, soaked with 15 mM NaCL). The anodal electrode will be placed over the M1 contralateral to the worst somatic pain area (C3, EEG 10/20 system) and the cathode over the supraorbital area contralateral to the anodal electrode. A constant current of 2 mA intensity will be applied for 20 minutes once a day for 5 consecutive days.
Active tDCS using tDCS device
Active tDCS using tDCS device is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that utilizes low amplitude direct currents applied via scalp electrodes to apply currents to the brain and modulate the level of cortical excitability. tDCS applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal and motor cortex has been reported to be able to decrease pain sensation and to increase pain threshold in healthy subjects and is effective in reducing central chronic pain in PwMS.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active tDCS using tDCS device
Active tDCS using tDCS device is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that utilizes low amplitude direct currents applied via scalp electrodes to apply currents to the brain and modulate the level of cortical excitability. tDCS applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal and motor cortex has been reported to be able to decrease pain sensation and to increase pain threshold in healthy subjects and is effective in reducing central chronic pain in PwMS.
SHAM tDCS using tDCS device
SHAM tDCS emulates active tDCS in all but the actual stimulation. Electrodes of the tDCS device are placed in the same place as with active tDCS however no current is activated.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age range 18-65
* Expanded disability status scale comprised between 1.5 and 6.5 with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) in remitting phase
* Presenting with chronic, drug-resistant, neuropathic pain
* Patients must score at or above a 0 on the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ).
* Patients must score at least a 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain perception at baseline
* All analgesic medications discontinued at least 24 hours before entering the study
Exclusion Criteria
* disease-modifying medications, or
* a relapse of disease symptoms within the last 60 days
* History of seizures
* History of traumatic brain injury
* History of claustrophobia
* Presence of:
* pacemakers,
* aneurysm clips,
* artificial heart valves,
* metallic prostheses, or
* pregnancy.
* Recent hospitalization (within the last 3 months)
* Enforced bed rest/sedentary state
* Resting plasma glucose greater than 200 mg/dl
* Presence of other neurological disorders.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Thorsten Rudroff
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thorsten Rudroff
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thorsten Rudroff, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Colorado Denver
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
17-0690
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.