Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Lower Neuropathic Pain in People With Multiple Sclerosis

NCT ID: NCT03219073

Last Updated: 2022-11-29

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-01

Study Completion Date

2018-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that utilizes low amplitude direct currents applied via scalp electrodes to apply currents to the brain and modulate the level of cortical excitability. tDCS applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal and motor cortex has been reported to be able to decrease pain sensation and to increase pain threshold in healthy subjects and is effective in reducing central chronic pain in patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS.) In spite of the encouraging results of tDCS in PwMS, detailed mechanisms accounting for its analgesic effect have not yet been elucidated.

This will be the first study to determine the effects of tDCS on whole and regional brain activity in PwMS with neuropathic pain to identify potential mechanisms of the analgesic effects of tDCS. These findings will provide targets for future studies investigating different stimulation areas, possible short- and long-term side effects, and specific target areas for other precise stimulation techniques such as transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators aim is to identify changes in brain activation following transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and determine whether these changes are associated with reduced ratings of pain. The investigators hypothesize that the analgesic effects of tDCS are associated with altered glucose metabolism of key regions of the top-down pain modulatory system, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and medulla.

This study will follow an interventional protocol with two groups. Upon enrollment into the study, all participants will undergo testing for the outcome measures described above. Each participant will then be randomly assigned into the SHAM or tDCS group for the study intervention. This study will be completed over the course of 6 consecutive days and 1 follow-up phone call 1 week after the final testing for each participant (total of 13 days).

Two age and sex matched groups, each n =8, will receive either tDCS or SHAM stimulation.

All of the following measures will be performed before and after the tDCS or SHAM intervention.

Fluorodeoxyglucose (\[18F\] FDG) - Whole and regional brain FDG uptake will be measured to determine the mechanistic effect of tDCS on brain activity.

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - The VAS is a self-evaluation scale where the participant is asked to mark a segment that ranges from 0-100 as visually described in millimeter units where 0 mm indicates no pain and 100 mm indicates the worst possible pain. This scale has been widely used in studies that evaluated pain as an outcome measure: both validity and reproducibility have been demonstrated.

VAS for Anxiety - This is a self-evaluation scale that ranges from 0 to 100 mm: 0 mm indicates no anxiety and 100 mm indicates the worst possible anxiety.

Prior to beginning the 2nd-5th tDCS sessions, the effectiveness of tDCS will be assessed using the following procedures:

Visual Analog Scale (VAS) - Each participant will be asked how effective the previous day's tDCS session was at reducing their pain by marking a segment on the range of 0-100 as visually described in millimeter units where 0 mm indicates no reduction in pain and 100 mm indicates complete alleviation of pain.

Duration of Relief - If the participant indicates any reduction in pain following the previous day's tDCS session, the participant will be asked to estimate how long the participant's pain was reduced following the session.

One week following the post-intervention testing, participants will be contacted via telephone and asked the following questions:

1. Was tDCS effective at reducing the participant's pain?
2. If so, how long did the participant notice a reduction in pain following the participant's final tDCS session?
3. Have the participants reduced their use of pain relieving medications since the last tDCS session?

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis Neuropathic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two age and sex matched groups, each n =8, will be randomized to receive either tDCS or SHAM stimulation.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
Patients and assessing investigator will be blinded to group allocation while the treating investigator, who has to set the tDCS or sham-stimulation protocol on the stimulator, will be the only person aware of the stimulation condition. To minimize communication between blinded and non-blinded participants, the treating investigator will be instructed not to talk to patients and the assessing investigator about the study protocol.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SHAM tDCS

SHAM tDCS using tDCS device will be used for sham stimulation where the electrodes will be placed in the same positions as for anodal M1 stimulation, but the stimulator will be turned off after 90 seconds. Therefore, the patients feel the initial itching sensation but receive no current for the rest of the stimulation period.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

SHAM tDCS using tDCS device

Intervention Type DEVICE

SHAM tDCS emulates active tDCS in all but the actual stimulation. Electrodes of the tDCS device are placed in the same place as with active tDCS however no current is activated.

Active tDCS with a tDCS device

Active tDCS using tDCS device (Neuroelectrics Inc., Simi Valley, CA, USA) will deliver a small direct current through two sponge surface electrodes (5cm × 5cm, soaked with 15 mM NaCL). The anodal electrode will be placed over the M1 contralateral to the worst somatic pain area (C3, EEG 10/20 system) and the cathode over the supraorbital area contralateral to the anodal electrode. A constant current of 2 mA intensity will be applied for 20 minutes once a day for 5 consecutive days.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Active tDCS using tDCS device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Active tDCS using tDCS device is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that utilizes low amplitude direct currents applied via scalp electrodes to apply currents to the brain and modulate the level of cortical excitability. tDCS applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal and motor cortex has been reported to be able to decrease pain sensation and to increase pain threshold in healthy subjects and is effective in reducing central chronic pain in PwMS.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active tDCS using tDCS device

Active tDCS using tDCS device is a noninvasive brain stimulation technique that utilizes low amplitude direct currents applied via scalp electrodes to apply currents to the brain and modulate the level of cortical excitability. tDCS applied over the dorsolateral prefrontal and motor cortex has been reported to be able to decrease pain sensation and to increase pain threshold in healthy subjects and is effective in reducing central chronic pain in PwMS.

Intervention Type DEVICE

SHAM tDCS using tDCS device

SHAM tDCS emulates active tDCS in all but the actual stimulation. Electrodes of the tDCS device are placed in the same place as with active tDCS however no current is activated.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with Multiple Sclerosis (PwMS)
* Age range 18-65
* Expanded disability status scale comprised between 1.5 and 6.5 with relapsing remitting MS (RRMS) in remitting phase
* Presenting with chronic, drug-resistant, neuropathic pain
* Patients must score at or above a 0 on the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (NPQ).
* Patients must score at least a 40 mm on the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain perception at baseline
* All analgesic medications discontinued at least 24 hours before entering the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Any change in:

* disease-modifying medications, or
* a relapse of disease symptoms within the last 60 days
* History of seizures
* History of traumatic brain injury
* History of claustrophobia
* Presence of:

* pacemakers,
* aneurysm clips,
* artificial heart valves,
* metallic prostheses, or
* pregnancy.
* Recent hospitalization (within the last 3 months)
* Enforced bed rest/sedentary state
* Resting plasma glucose greater than 200 mg/dl
* Presence of other neurological disorders.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Thorsten Rudroff

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Thorsten Rudroff

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thorsten Rudroff, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Colorado, Denver

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Colorado Denver

Aurora, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-0690

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

tDCS for Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02771990 COMPLETED NA