The Effects of Fixed Space Maintainers Luting with Self-Adhesive Resin Cement on the Gingival Crevicular Fluid of Interleukin-18 Level

NCT ID: NCT06811597

Last Updated: 2025-02-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-06-13

Study Completion Date

2023-05-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:In pediatric dentistry, fixed space maintainers are crucial for preserving the space in edentulous areas following premature tooth loss and promoting the healthy development of the dental arch, maxilla, and mandibula. A vital aspect in ensuring the long-term functionality of the space maintainer is the selection of the appropriate luting agent. Conventional glass ionomer cements (GIC), known for their chemical properties and biocompatibility, are widely regarded as safe and effective luting agents. Despite the prevalent use of resin cements (RCs) in modern dentistry, studies examining the effects of fixed space maintainers (FSMs) luted with resin cements (RCs) on periodontal status are lacking.

Material:This split-mouth design study involved 31 children aged 6 to 10 years who prematurely lost their mandibular second primary molars. The left mandibular first molars were bonded with FSM High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement, while the right molars were bonded with Meron (conventional glass ionomer cement). Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD) were measured before luting and at the 1-week follow-up. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was collected from the abutment teeth using Periopaper® strips before luting and at the one-week follow-up. ELISA was then performed to measure the levels of the proinflammatory cytokine Interleukin-18(IL-18). Statistical Analyses involved the Mann-Whitney U test for comparing two groups of qualitative and quantitative variables, and the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks test for assessing differences between two dependent quantitative variables. A significance threshold of p \< 0.05 was used for statistical inference.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Introduction Fixed space maintainers (FSMs) are important preventive orthodontic devices used in pediatric dentistry. These devices are specifically designed to preserve the spaces left by premature tooth loss or planned tooth extractions. Maintaining these spaces is crucial for guiding the proper eruption of permanent teeth, contributing to a child's healthy dental development. Pediatric dentists are the most frequently consulted professionals during this stage, and their preventive practices significantly impact the preservation of the edentulous space during the transition from mixed dentition to permanent dentition.

The primary objective of all types of space maintainers in primary and mixed dentition is to preserve arch length by preventing space loss within the dental arch. Space loss may occur as a result of the mesial migration of teeth positioned distal to an edentulous area through tipping, or due to the distal drifting of teeth that remain mesial to the edentulous region. The type and design of space maintainers employed to preserve the edentulous spaces resulting from premature loss of primary teeth are contingent upon various factors. These factors include the number of teeth that have been lost in the affected area, the stage of the child's dental development, and the specific dental arch where the space maintainer is to be applied. Considering all these factors, FSMs are the most preferred option among the various types of space maintainers, as they remain unaffected by jaw or dental arch conditions.

Preventing malocclusions in a developing child due to the premature loss of primary teeth is crucial. This can be accomplished by using a space maintainer as soon as possible after a tooth extraction. This can protect the space left by the missing tooth and help maintain the proper arch length as the child continues to grow. FSMs need to remain cemented in the mouth for an extended period, as even a matter of days can be significant in this process. To achieve optimal results, the cementation process must be conducted with durable luting cement. Traditionally, it has been advised to cement FSMs using conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC). However, over the past decade, resin cement (RC) has become increasingly prevalent due to significant advancements in bonding technology and the rising adoption of adhesive resin cement within dentistry.

While resin cement has been employed to enhance the survival of FSMs, it is crucial to note that research investigating periodontal inflammation in children arising from residual cement following the FSM cementation process is lacking. Numerous inflammatory cytokine biomarkers indicate the presence of gingival inflammation. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, tumor necrosis factor(TNF-α), anti-inflammatory cytokines, and host factor metalloproteinases play significant roles in regulating inflammatory responses. Interleukin-18 (IL-18) is a significant pro-inflammatory cytokine belonging to the Interleukin-1 (IL-1) family. It is essential in the immune response to infections and various diseases. The function of IL-18 in the inflammatory response is to facilitate the expression of adhesion molecules on endothelial cells, thereby increasing the recruitment of immune cells to the site of inflammation. The accumulation of IL-18 in regions that are persistently exposed to irritants triggers chronic tissue damage, facilitating the progression of the disease's pathogenesis. The role of IL-18 in immune regulation and inflammation suggests that it may serve as a potential biomarker for tracking the progression of various diseases. Studies have indicated that the expression levels of IL-18 are significantly elevated in gingival crevicular fluid and gingival tissue samples associated with gingival inflammation and periodontal diseases.

Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) is recognized as the primary medium for analyzing alterations in the local tissue environment, thereby facilitating the assessment of periodontal health and disease. This fluid is instrumental in understanding the physiological changes occurring in periodontal conditions. The noninvasive collection of biomarkers in GCF is an essential diagnostic method for accurately assessing gingival health in clinical settings.

Upon re-evaluating the FSM treatment protocol in light of this information, it becomes clear that FSMs are frequently cemented within the gingival pocket in cases where they come into contact with the gingiva. Current literature remains unclear about inflammation effects in the periodontal sulcus caused by the use of resin cement for luting space maintainers. The null hypothesis of this study posits that FSMs luted with conventional GIC and those luted with resin cement result in identical alterations in IL-18 levels within the GCF of pediatric patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gingival and Periodontal Disease Space Maintenance Resin Cements Interleukin

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

This split-mouth design study involved 31 children aged 6 to 10 years who prematurely lost their mandibular second primary molars. The left mandibular first molars were bonded with FSM High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement, while the right molars were bonded with Meron (conventional glass ionomer cement). Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), and Periodontal Probing Depth (PPD) were measured before luting and at the 1-week follow-up. Gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) was collected from the abutment teeth using Periopaper® strips before luting and at the one-week follow-up. ELISA was then performed to measure the levels of the proinflammatory cytokine Interleukin-18(IL-18).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Voco Meron Conventional Glass Ionomer Group

The right molars were bonded with conventional glass ionomer cement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Voco Meron Conventional Glass Ionomer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The right molars were bonded with Meron

High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement

The left mandibular first molars were bonded with FSM High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The left mandibular first molars were bonded with FSM High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Voco Meron Conventional Glass Ionomer

The right molars were bonded with Meron

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement.

The left mandibular first molars were bonded with FSM High-Q-Bond Band™ self-adhesive resin cement.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children who have not received any antibiotic treatment in the past four months,
* Children who do not have any underlying systemic diseases.
* Children who are not required to take medication regularly,
* Both girls and boys between the ages of 6 and 10.
* The second primary molar teeth (75 and 85) were extracted from patients due to caries and associated periapical pathologies.
* The presence of the succeeding tooth germ.
* Pediatric patients exhibiting Angle Class I occlusal relationships.
* Children without skeletal abnormalities.
* Existence of the antagonistic tooth of the abutment tooth.
* Children and their parents willing to participate in the study and attend the control session one week later were included.

Exclusion Criteria

* The patient presents with periodontal disease.
* Children with cognitive disabilities, including autism and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, as well as those with mental health conditions such as cerebral palsy and Down syndrome.
* Children and their parents who did not meet the specified criteria were excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

10 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Özgür Doğan

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Suat Serhan Altıntepe Doğan, Assoc. Prof. (PhD)

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Afyonkarahisar Health Sciences University

Afyonkarahisar, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Afyonkarahisar Health Science

Afyonkarahisar, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Khanna S, Rao D, Panwar S, Pawar BA, Ameen S. 3D Printed Band and Loop Space Maintainer: A Digital Game Changer in Preventive Orthodontics. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jul 1;45(3):147-151. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.3.1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34192758 (View on PubMed)

Cengiz A, Karayilmaz H. Comparative evaluation of the clinical success of 3D-printed space maintainers and band-loop space maintainers. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;34(5):584-592. doi: 10.1111/ipd.13159. Epub 2024 Jan 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38217333 (View on PubMed)

Dinarello CA. Interleukin 1 and interleukin 18 as mediators of inflammation and the aging process. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Feb;83(2):447S-455S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/83.2.447S.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16470011 (View on PubMed)

Johnson RB, Serio FG. Interleukin-18 concentrations and the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J Periodontol. 2005 May;76(5):785-90. doi: 10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.785.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15898940 (View on PubMed)

Jablonska E, Izycka A, Jablonska J, Wawrusiewicz N, Piecuch J. Role of IL-18 in the secretion of Il-1beta, sIL-1RII, and IL-1Ra by human neutrophils. Immunol Invest. 2001 Aug;30(3):221-9. doi: 10.1081/imm-100105066.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11570642 (View on PubMed)

Orozco A, Gemmell E, Bickel M, Seymour GJ. Interleukin-1beta, interleukin-12 and interleukin-18 levels in gingival fluid and serum of patients with gingivitis and periodontitis. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2006 Aug;21(4):256-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2006.00292.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16842511 (View on PubMed)

Nair V, Grover V, Arora S, Das G, Ahmad I, Ohri A, Sainudeen S, Saluja P, Saha A. Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Crevicular Fluid Interleukin-17, 18 and 21 in Different Stages of Periodontal Health and Disease. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Aug 3;58(8):1042. doi: 10.3390/medicina58081042.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36013509 (View on PubMed)

Kinney JS, Morelli T, Oh M, Braun TM, Ramseier CA, Sugai JV, Giannobile WV. Crevicular fluid biomarkers and periodontal disease progression. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Feb;41(2):113-120. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12194. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24303954 (View on PubMed)

Kaur J, Singh A, Sadana G, Mehra M, Mahajan M. Evaluation of Shear Peel Bond Strength of Different Adhesive Cements Used for Fixed Space Maintainer Cementation: An In Vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Mar-Apr;14(2):175-179. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1932.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34413586 (View on PubMed)

Ierardo G, Luzzi V, Lesti M, Vozza I, Brugnoletti O, Polimeni A, Bossu M. Peek polymer in orthodontics: A pilot study on children. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Oct 1;9(10):e1271-e1275. doi: 10.4317/jced.54010. eCollection 2017 Oct.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29167720 (View on PubMed)

Neto HNM, Leite JVC, de Medeiros JM, E Silva Campos D, de Araujo Ferreira Muniz I, De Andrade AKM, Duarte RM, De Souza GM, Lima RBW. Scoping review: Effect of surface treatments on bond strength of resin composite repair. J Dent. 2024 Jan;140:104737. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104737. Epub 2023 Oct 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37816488 (View on PubMed)

Anumula L, Ramesh S, Kolaparthi VSK. Matrix metalloproteinases in dentin: Assessing their presence, activity, and inhibitors - a review of current trends. Dent Mater. 2024 Nov;40(11):2051-2073. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.09.011. Epub 2024 Oct 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39368893 (View on PubMed)

Barathi D, Jampanapalli SR, Patloth T, Konda S, Inguva H, Shaik H. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bonded Space Maintainers Using Ormocers, Nanofilled and Glass Fiber-reinforced Adhesive Composites. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jun;17(6):695-701. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2904.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39391145 (View on PubMed)

Alvarenga M, Machado L, Prado A, Veloso S, Monteiro G. Self-adhesive resin cement versus conventional cements on the failure rate of indirect single-tooth restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Nov;132(5):880.e1-880.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.04.027. Epub 2024 May 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38797576 (View on PubMed)

Hemdan ME, El Kalla IHH, El Agamy RA. Clinical Evaluation of Different Designs of Fixed Space Maintainer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(4):442-450. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2835.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 39144172 (View on PubMed)

Laing E, Ashley P, Naini FB, Gill DS. Space maintenance. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 May;19(3):155-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2008.00951.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19385999 (View on PubMed)

Gupta A, Dutta B, Dhull KS, Md I, Wandile B. A Leap Beyond Traditional Methods: A Case Report on the Horizontal Loop Distal Shoe. Cureus. 2024 May 6;16(5):e59724. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59724. eCollection 2024 May.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38840994 (View on PubMed)

Qudeimat MA, Sasa IS. Clinical success and longevity of band and loop compared to crown and loop space maintainers. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2015 Oct;16(5):391-6. doi: 10.1007/s40368-015-0183-y. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25788173 (View on PubMed)

Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study. Pediatr Dent. 1998 Jul-Aug;20(4):267-72.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9783298 (View on PubMed)

Lee JH. Fully digital workflow for the fabrication of a tooth-colored space maintainer for a young patient. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jun;35(4):561-566. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12939. Epub 2022 Jun 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35731166 (View on PubMed)

Barros SE, Siqueira SP, Janson G, Chiqueto K. Short-term efficacy of vacuum-formed maintainer for deciduous second molar space maintenance in the mixed dentition: A single-centre, randomized controlled clinical trial. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2021 Nov;24(4):502-510. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12460. Epub 2021 Jan 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33352006 (View on PubMed)

Heidari A, Mokhtari S, Hamrah MH, Tavana Z, Heydarigoojani M, Tavana N. Investigating the Factors Affecting the Need for Unilateral Space Maintainer for First Primary Molars in Late Mixed Dentition. Biomed Res Int. 2022 Mar 29;2022:7604144. doi: 10.1155/2022/7604144. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35392262 (View on PubMed)

Dogan O, Dogan SSA. Arm design of band and loop space maintainer affects its longevity: a patient-specific finite element study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Jan;48(1):171-183. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.019. Epub 2024 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38239170 (View on PubMed)

Watt E, Ahmad A, Adamji R, Katsimpali A, Ashley P, Noar J. Space maintainers in the primary and mixed dentition - a clinical guide. Br Dent J. 2018 Aug 24;225(4):293-298. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.650.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30141512 (View on PubMed)

Nascimento EB, Rodrigues R, Manso MC. Prevalence of dental floss use in deciduous dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Dent Hyg. 2023 Feb;21(1):116-127. doi: 10.1111/idh.12611. Epub 2022 Aug 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35924390 (View on PubMed)

Law CS. Management of premature primary tooth loss in the child patient. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2013 Aug;41(8):612-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24073500 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011-KAEK-2/ 2022/7336

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.