Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone Added as Adjuvant Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block in Upper Limb Surgery

NCT ID: NCT06779604

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dexmedetomidine and dexamethasone added during USG-guided infraclavicular block on block onset time, total block time and time to first analgesic need in patients undergoing upper extremity surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Brachial plexus blocks are successfully applied for perioperative/postoperative analgesia in upper extremity surgical procedures. These blocks include infraclavicular, supraclavicular, interscalene, and axillary blocks. The reason why infraclavicular block is preferred is that it provides comprehensive anesthesia/analgesia of the upper extremity. While the axillary approach may fail to block the musculocutaneous nerve that causes tourniquet pain, the interscalene and supraclavicular approaches generally fail to provide anesthesia in the distribution of the ulnar nerve. Other advantages include the lower risk of lung and pleural puncture compared to interscalene and supraclavicular blocks and the lower probability of injury to neurovascular structures due to the location of the block, unlike the interscalene approach.

Local anesthetics are used to block conduction in nerve fibers during brachial plexus blocks. Studies have shown that the commonly used bupivacaine and ropivacaine 0.25% concentrations are not recommended for anesthesia. Bupivacaine 0.5% and ropivacaine 0.5% have been shown to be similar in terms of sensory and motor block onset time, total sensory and motor block duration, analgesia duration, anesthesia duration, paresis and paralysis incidence. The minimum dose of bupivacaine 0.5% required for complete sensory block was determined as 14mL, but the onset time of the block performed at this low dose was recorded as a late onset of 40 minutes (30-45 minutes). It was observed that the onset time decreased to as short as 15 minutes (min) after the application of 30mL bupivacaine 0.5%. In order to reduce the amount of local anesthetic used, to avoid local anesthetic toxicity, to shorten the block onset time and to extend the postoperative analgesia period, a different local anesthetic or adjuvants were used together with bupivacaine. Bupivacaine used with lidocaine has been observed to have a faster onset of action. Other adjuvants added to accelerate the onset of block and improve the quality of the block include alpha-2 agonists (clonidine and dexmedetomidine), opioids (fentanyl and tramadol), and steroids (dexamethasone). Dexmedetomidine is an adjuvant that is an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist and has been observed to have a synergistic effect with local anesthetics and to prolong their duration of activity. The addition of dexmedetomidine 50 µg and 75 µg has been associated with a decrease in the time to onset of sensory and motor block, a decrease in postoperative morphine consumption, and an increase in the duration of sensory block, motor block, and the time to first morphine request. Dexmedetomidine 75 µg has been associated with an increased incidence of preoperative and intraoperative hypotension episodes. Dexamethasone, a perineural adjuvant, has been shown in many studies to significantly shorten the onset of sensory and motor block and prolong the duration of analgesia. Perineural dexamethasone is more commonly used intravenously for block. Currently, many studies have compared the effects of various perineural dexamethasone doses, such as 1 mg, 2 mg, 4 mg, 5 mg and 8 mg, on block, but the results remain controversial. Studies have shown that there is no difference in safety and efficacy between 4 and 8 mg perineural dexamethasone. Another study reported that 4 mg perineural dexamethasone constitutes a ceiling dose for prolonging the duration of analgesia when used with local anesthetics for block.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain Anesthesia Acute Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group Dexmedetomidine: (n:22)

A total volume of 30 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine, 14 mL of 2% lidocaine and 50 μgr of dexmedetomidine in 1 mL of normal saline is administered to the patients.

Infraclavicular Block with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Infraclavicular block with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone was performed at least 30 min before the start of the operation. The patient was positioned in a supine position arms at the sides or in 90 degree abduction, head turned to the other side. Infraclavicular block was performed with the lateral sagittal technique, while the USG probe was placed under the clavicle and medial to the coracoid process, providing a brachial plexus image in the form of a hyperechoic outer ring and hypoechoic circles, like a classic honeycomb image. A local anesthetic mixture was injected with a 100 mm block needle with negative aspiration and its spread in tissue planes was observed.

If the VAS score was 3 or above, tramadol 1 mg kg-1 was administered as an analgesic drug.

GroupDexamethasone: (n:22)

Patients are administered 0.5% bupivacaine 15 mL, 2% lidocaine 14 mL and 4 mg dexamethasone in 1 ml normal saline with a total volume of 30 mL

Infraclavicular Block with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Infraclavicular block with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone was performed at least 30 min before the start of the operation. The patient was positioned in a supine position arms at the sides or in 90 degree abduction, head turned to the other side. Infraclavicular block was performed with the lateral sagittal technique, while the USG probe was placed under the clavicle and medial to the coracoid process, providing a brachial plexus image in the form of a hyperechoic outer ring and hypoechoic circles, like a classic honeycomb image. A local anesthetic mixture was injected with a 100 mm block needle with negative aspiration and its spread in tissue planes was observed.

If the VAS score was 3 or above, tramadol 1 mg kg-1 was administered as an analgesic drug.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Infraclavicular Block with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone

Infraclavicular block with Dexmedetomidine and Dexamethasone was performed at least 30 min before the start of the operation. The patient was positioned in a supine position arms at the sides or in 90 degree abduction, head turned to the other side. Infraclavicular block was performed with the lateral sagittal technique, while the USG probe was placed under the clavicle and medial to the coracoid process, providing a brachial plexus image in the form of a hyperechoic outer ring and hypoechoic circles, like a classic honeycomb image. A local anesthetic mixture was injected with a 100 mm block needle with negative aspiration and its spread in tissue planes was observed.

If the VAS score was 3 or above, tramadol 1 mg kg-1 was administered as an analgesic drug.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18-70 years
* ASA I-II

Exclusion Criteria

* Under 18 years of age and older than 70 years of age,
* presence of brachial plexus injury,
* patients with bleeding diathesis,
* presence of allergy, -contralateral diaphragmatic paralysis, -
* presence of nerve injury secondary to trauma,
* pre-existing neuropathy of the surgical extremity,
* presence of severe pulmonary,
* renal and hepatic disease,
* congestive heart failure (NYHA stage 3-4),
* uncontrolled diabetes mellitus,
* history of neuromuscular disease,
* patients with extreme obesity or malnutrition (BMI \> 30 kg-1m2 or BMI \<20 kg-1m2),
* presence of epilepsy,
* history of peripheral vascular disease,
* history of chronic pain or fibromyalgia,
* pregnant and lactating patients,
* patients with local infection at the injection site,
* patients undergoing general anesthesia due to inadequacy of the block,
* patients refusing to give informed consent,
* history of recreational substance use, and chronic narcotic-based painkillers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zeliha Alicikus

Head of Anesthesia and reanimation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ZELİHA TUNCEL, ASC PROF

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Umraniye ERH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Umraniye Education and Research Hospital

Istanbul, Umraniye, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ZELİHA TUNCEL, ASC PROF

Role: CONTACT

5053577483

ZELİHA TUNCEL, ASC PROF

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Zeliha TUNCEL, asc prof

Role: primary

905053577483

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UERH-AR-ZT-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.