The Need for Supplemental Blocks in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks

NCT ID: NCT04102358

Last Updated: 2024-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

139 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-01

Study Completion Date

2019-05-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Theoretically, all surgeries below mid-humerus can be done under infraclavicular (IC) blocks. Following the introduction of ultrasonography (USG) to clinical anesthesia, plexus, and nerve blocks under the guidance of USG have gained wide acceptance for the high rates of block success and low risk of complications (1). In this study, the main aim is to evaluate the single injection and triple injection techniques in IC blocks with a USG-guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. The secondary goals are to compare the complication rates and sensory block durations and to discuss the possible reasons for the failure of the blocks.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Theoretically all surgeries below mid-humerus can be done under infraclavicular (IC) blocks. Following the introduction of ultrasonography (USG) to the clinical anesthesia, plexus and nerve blocks under the guidance of USG have gained wide acceptance for the high rates of block success, and low risk of complications. At the same time, it was also shown that USG-guided IC blocks can shorten procedural times and accelerate the onset of the blocks.

Several methods for IC blocks have been described. Based on the anatomical knowledge, we hypothesized that in medial approaches the need for supplementary blocks would be low with single injections as well as triple injections. In this study, the main aim is to evaluate the single injection and triple injection techniques in IC blocks with a USG-guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. The secondary goals are to compare the complication rates and sensory block durations and to discuss the possible reasons for the failure of the blocks.

Medical records of 139 patients scheduled for elective or emergent hand, wrist, forearm, elbow, and distal arm surgery were analyzed. Patients older than 14 years with ASA physical status I-III who underwent surgery between October 2017 and March 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Exclusion criteria included non-cooperative patients, refusal of the regional anesthesia, known neuropathy that could prevent the evaluation of the efficacy of the block, different techniques used for infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (lateral sagittal, coracoid, …etc.), and known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anesthesia, Regional

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single injection

Patients who received an infraclavicular block with a single injection technique were included in Group-S.

Medial approach infraclavicular block with single injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

infraclavicular blocks performed with single injection

Triple injection

Patients who received an infraclavicular block with a triple injection technique were included in Group-T.

Medial approach infraclavicular block with triple injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

infraclavicular blocks performed with triple injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medial approach infraclavicular block with single injection

infraclavicular blocks performed with single injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Medial approach infraclavicular block with triple injection

infraclavicular blocks performed with triple injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA physical status I-III
* upper extremity surgery
* blocks were performed by the same anesthesiologist

Exclusion Criteria

* non-cooperative patients
* refusal of the regional anesthesia
* known neuropathy
* different technique used for infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (lateral sagittal, coracoid, …etc.)
* known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
Minimum Eligible Age

14 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Derince Training and Research Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hande Gurbuz

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tuncay Colak, Prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Kocaeli University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Derince Training and Research Hospital

Kocaeli, Derince, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):408-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384. Epub 2009 Jan 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19174373 (View on PubMed)

Li JW, Songthamwat B, Samy W, Sala-Blanch X, Karmakar MK. Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Sonoanatomy, Technique, and Block Dynamics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):233-240. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000566.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28157792 (View on PubMed)

Kilka HG, Geiger P, Mehrkens HH. [Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade. A new method for anesthesia of the upper extremity. An anatomical and clinical study]. Anaesthesist. 1995 May;44(5):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s001010050162. German.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7611581 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1240-8832

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Parasagittal Vs Cornerpocket Approaches
NCT06352333 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA