The Need for Supplemental Blocks in Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
NCT ID: NCT04102358
Last Updated: 2024-02-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
139 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-10-01
2019-05-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Infraclavicular And Supraclavicular Block
NCT04784104
Upper Trunk Block Versus Costoclavicular Block For Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
NCT04194385
Comparison of Different Approaches for Supraclavicular Block and Their Effects on Diaphragm Muscle Function
NCT04756050
Comparison of Costoclavicular and Paracoracoid Approaches to Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
NCT05260736
Comparison of Selective Trunk and Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
NCT06004648
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several methods for IC blocks have been described. Based on the anatomical knowledge, we hypothesized that in medial approaches the need for supplementary blocks would be low with single injections as well as triple injections. In this study, the main aim is to evaluate the single injection and triple injection techniques in IC blocks with a USG-guided medial approach in terms of block success and the need for supplementary blocks. The secondary goals are to compare the complication rates and sensory block durations and to discuss the possible reasons for the failure of the blocks.
Medical records of 139 patients scheduled for elective or emergent hand, wrist, forearm, elbow, and distal arm surgery were analyzed. Patients older than 14 years with ASA physical status I-III who underwent surgery between October 2017 and March 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Exclusion criteria included non-cooperative patients, refusal of the regional anesthesia, known neuropathy that could prevent the evaluation of the efficacy of the block, different techniques used for infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (lateral sagittal, coracoid, …etc.), and known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single injection
Patients who received an infraclavicular block with a single injection technique were included in Group-S.
Medial approach infraclavicular block with single injection
infraclavicular blocks performed with single injection
Triple injection
Patients who received an infraclavicular block with a triple injection technique were included in Group-T.
Medial approach infraclavicular block with triple injection
infraclavicular blocks performed with triple injection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Medial approach infraclavicular block with single injection
infraclavicular blocks performed with single injection
Medial approach infraclavicular block with triple injection
infraclavicular blocks performed with triple injection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* upper extremity surgery
* blocks were performed by the same anesthesiologist
Exclusion Criteria
* refusal of the regional anesthesia
* known neuropathy
* different technique used for infraclavicular brachial plexus blocks (lateral sagittal, coracoid, …etc.)
* known allergy to local anesthetic drugs.
14 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Derince Training and Research Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hande Gurbuz
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tuncay Colak, Prof
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Kocaeli University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Derince Training and Research Hospital
Kocaeli, Derince, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abrahams MS, Aziz MF, Fu RF, Horn JL. Ultrasound guidance compared with electrical neurostimulation for peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Mar;102(3):408-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen384. Epub 2009 Jan 26.
Li JW, Songthamwat B, Samy W, Sala-Blanch X, Karmakar MK. Ultrasound-Guided Costoclavicular Brachial Plexus Block: Sonoanatomy, Technique, and Block Dynamics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):233-240. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000566.
Kilka HG, Geiger P, Mehrkens HH. [Infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus blockade. A new method for anesthesia of the upper extremity. An anatomical and clinical study]. Anaesthesist. 1995 May;44(5):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s001010050162. German.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1240-8832
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.