Impact of Interscalene Block Combined With General Anesthesia on Burst Suppression in Shoulder Surgery Patients
NCT ID: NCT07081672
Last Updated: 2025-07-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-29
2025-07-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrasound Guidance for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
NCT00702416
Shoulder Anterior Capsular Block and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT05727345
Interscalene Versus Costoclavicular Blocks for Shoulder Surgery
NCT06953947
Comparison of Costoclavicular and Paracoracoid Approaches to Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks
NCT05260736
Injection Optimization of Infraclavicular and Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
NCT03484247
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A total of 50 ASA I-III patients scheduled for shoulder surgery were randomly assigned into two groups: Group B (general anesthesia + ISB) and Group K (general anesthesia only). Standardized general anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane in both groups. EEG data were recorded continuously using a SedLine® monitor from frontal electrodes (Fp1, Fp2, F7, F8) during four perioperative phases. Spectral analysis was performed using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) and Welch's method to quantify power in the delta (0.5-4 Hz), theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz), and beta (13-30 Hz) bands. BSR was calculated based on the duration of EEG suppression epochs, while PSI and SEF (Spectral Edge Frequency) were recorded continuously.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SCREENING
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients in Group B received an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB)
A total of 20 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine was administered around the C5-C6 nerve roots under real-time ultrasound visualization. Fifteen minutes after the block, both sensory and motor block assessments were performed to confirm effectiveness. Following confirmation of a successful block, a standardized general anesthesia protocol was initiated using 1-2 mg/kg propofol, 1 mcg/kg fentanyl, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium, followed by endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (1.0-1.3 MAC), and depth of anesthesia was continuously monitored using the SedLine® EEG monitor.
Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB)
The intervention consisted of an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) administered to patients in Group B prior to general anesthesia. The block was performed using a posterior in-plane approach with real-time ultrasound visualization. A total of 20 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine was injected around the C5-C6 nerve roots under sterile conditions by experienced anesthesiologists.
Patients in Group K did not receive any regional anesthesia prior to general anesthesia induction.
After standard monitoring was established, including ECG, non-invasive blood pressure, SpO₂, and SedLine® EEG monitoring, a 5-minute baseline EEG recording (Phase 0) was obtained with the patient at rest, eyes closed, and in a noise-minimized environment. Subsequently, general anesthesia was induced using 1-2 mg/kg propofol, 1 mcg/kg fentanyl, and 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium, followed by endotracheal intubation. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane at 1.0-1.3 MAC in a mixture of 50% oxygen and air. To ensure adequate intraoperative analgesia, a remifentanil infusion (0.05-0.2 μg/kg/min) was administered and titrated according to Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) values, aiming to maintain SPI between 20-50.
General Anesthesia (control group)
General anesthesia without regional block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB)
The intervention consisted of an ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) administered to patients in Group B prior to general anesthesia. The block was performed using a posterior in-plane approach with real-time ultrasound visualization. A total of 20 mL of 0.125% bupivacaine was injected around the C5-C6 nerve roots under sterile conditions by experienced anesthesiologists.
General Anesthesia (control group)
General anesthesia without regional block
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged between 18 and 65 years
* Scheduled for elective shoulder surgery under general anesthesia, with or without interscalene brachial plexus block
Exclusion Criteria
* Advanced hepatic failure
* Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m²
* History of central nervous system disorders
* Diagnosed psychiatric illness
* History of substance abuse
* Known allergy to any of the drugs used in the study
* Refusal to participate or to provide informed consent
Termination Criteria:
* Severe hypotension (mean arterial pressure \< 50 mmHg despite treatment)
* Severe bradycardia (heart rate \< 40 bpm requiring intervention)
* Profound hypoxia (SpO₂ \< 90% despite oxygen support)
* Drug-related allergic reactions
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Bezmialem Vakif University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tugba KOK
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kazım Karaaslan, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Bezmialem Vakif University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Bezmialem Vakif University
Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Tugba07
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.