Effects of Technique on the Local Anesthetic Dose Required for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
NCT ID: NCT00731146
Last Updated: 2008-08-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-08-31
2009-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does a Low Volume Ultrasound-Guided Technique Reduce Common Complications of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block?
NCT00497354
Determining the Minimal Effective Volume (MEAV95) for Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Surgical Anesthesia
NCT01703130
Analgesic Duration of Long Acting Local Anesthetics for Low Volume Ultrasound-guided Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
NCT02643563
Reducing Respiratory Side Effects of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block
NCT01374464
Suprascapular and Axillary Blocks Versus Interscalene Block for Shoulder Surgery
NCT02517437
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The goal of this study is to determine the minimum effective anesthetic volume of ropivacaine 0.5% providing analgesia in patients when using either ultrasound or a nerve stimulator to guide placement of the block. The primary outcome measure will be the pain score of the patient on a numeric rating score during the 30 minutes after surgery.
A number of previous studies have suggested that ultrasound-guidance is beneficial for peripheral nerve blocks in terms of block performance time, success rates, and block quality. Some studies have also shown that ultrasound-guidance can reduce the volume of local anesthetic needed to perform a successful block. This study may reveal that less local anesthetic is needed under ultrasound guidance than under nerve stimulator, which may potentially reduce some of the common complications of ISBPB.
We hypothesize that ISBPB done under ultrasound guidance will have a lower minimum effective local anesthetic volume than ISBPB done under nerve stimulation. Further, we hypothesize that the lower volume will reduce the incidence of some of the complications of ISBPB.
Using lower volumes of local anesthetic while still maintaining effective analgesia may reduce some of the common complications of ISBPB. It may also allow this beneficial analgesic technique to be given to patients with some respiratory risk factors who are currently unable to receive it.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1 - Ultrasound
Participants will receive an ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block
Ultrasound Minimum Effective Anesthetic Volume
Each sequential participant in this group will be assigned a dose based on the success or failure of the previous participant's block. The starting dose will be 10mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Each success will decrease the dose by 2.5mL and each failure will subsequently increase the dose by 2.5mL.
2 - Nerve Stimulator
Participants will receive a nerve stimulator guided interscalene brachial plexus block
Nerve Stimulator Minimum Effective Anesthetic Volume
Each sequential participant in this group will be assigned a dose based on the success or failure of the previous participant's block. The starting dose will be 10mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Each success will decrease the dose by 2.5mL and each failure will subsequently increase the dose by 2.5mL.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound Minimum Effective Anesthetic Volume
Each sequential participant in this group will be assigned a dose based on the success or failure of the previous participant's block. The starting dose will be 10mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Each success will decrease the dose by 2.5mL and each failure will subsequently increase the dose by 2.5mL.
Nerve Stimulator Minimum Effective Anesthetic Volume
Each sequential participant in this group will be assigned a dose based on the success or failure of the previous participant's block. The starting dose will be 10mL of 0.5% ropivacaine. Each success will decrease the dose by 2.5mL and each failure will subsequently increase the dose by 2.5mL.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Colin J McCartney, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SHSCA02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.