Reducing Respiratory Side Effects of Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block

NCT ID: NCT01374464

Last Updated: 2011-06-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

92 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Shoulder surgery is known to be extremely painful requiring high doses of opiate analgesics (morphine) to control pain. Morphine has numerous unwanted side effects including sedation, hallucinations and vomiting.

It is now standard procedure for patients undergoing shoulder surgery to have their pain controlled by means of an injection made around the nerves where they pass through the neck to supply the shoulder with sensation (similar to the numbing injections made by the dentist before a dental procedure). This injection is called a 'nerve block'.

Nerve blocks provide complete analgesia after shoulder surgery allowing clinicians to discharge patients home on the day of surgery, pain free and with no opiate side effects. However, a side effect of nerve blocks at this level is involvement of the phrenic nerve, which is anatomically close to the injection point. This may cause (temporary) paralysis of the diaphragm and in some cases, severe respiratory dysfunction.

Research shows that reducing either the volume or the concentration of the drug injected, can reduce the consequent respiratory dysfunction. However no study has compared both volume and concentration in parallel, to see which of these has the more significant effect in reducing respiratory dysfunction. Furthermore there has been no assessment of how these changes may affect the duration of analgesia received and patient coping after discharge.

The investigators propose to conduct a double blind randomised controlled trial at the Royal Surrey County Hospital, enrolling patients presenting for elective day case arthroscopic (key hole) surgery over a period of 6 months. Patients will receive one of four treatment allocations:

1. Low concentration-high volume of local anaesthetic
2. Low concentration-low volume of local anaesthetic
3. High concentration-high volume of local anaesthetic
4. High concentration-low volume of anaesthetic drug of local anaesthetic.

The aim of this study is to inform an optimum dosing regimen for patients in order to facilitate maximal pain relief and quality of recovery with minimum respiratory dysfunction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adverse Reaction to Peripheral Nerve- and Plexus-blocking Anesthetics

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Volume, High Concentration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene brachial plexus block

Intervention Type OTHER

4 different administrations of levobupivicaine will be applied:

1. High Volume, High Concentration = 15mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
2. High Volume, Low Concentration = 15mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine
3. Low Volume, High Concentration = 5mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
4. Low Volume, Low Concentration = 5mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine

High Volume, Low Concentration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene brachial plexus block

Intervention Type OTHER

4 different administrations of levobupivicaine will be applied:

1. High Volume, High Concentration = 15mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
2. High Volume, Low Concentration = 15mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine
3. Low Volume, High Concentration = 5mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
4. Low Volume, Low Concentration = 5mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine

Low Volume, High Concentration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene brachial plexus block

Intervention Type OTHER

4 different administrations of levobupivicaine will be applied:

1. High Volume, High Concentration = 15mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
2. High Volume, Low Concentration = 15mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine
3. Low Volume, High Concentration = 5mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
4. Low Volume, Low Concentration = 5mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine

Low Volume, Low Concentration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene brachial plexus block

Intervention Type OTHER

4 different administrations of levobupivicaine will be applied:

1. High Volume, High Concentration = 15mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
2. High Volume, Low Concentration = 15mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine
3. Low Volume, High Concentration = 5mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
4. Low Volume, Low Concentration = 5mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interscalene brachial plexus block

4 different administrations of levobupivicaine will be applied:

1. High Volume, High Concentration = 15mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
2. High Volume, Low Concentration = 15mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine
3. Low Volume, High Concentration = 5mls of 0.75% levobupivicaine
4. Low Volume, Low Concentration = 5mls of 0.5% levobupivicaine

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Levobupivicaine Chirocaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 18 and \< 80 years
2. American Society of Anaesthetists (ASA) grades I - III. (ASA grade determines how 'fit' a patient is for surgery, with 1 being a normal healthy patient and 5 being a moribund patient that is not expected to survive. 'Fitter' patients are being chosen as it is felt that severe associated illness may influence our results).
3. A composite pain score of 0 when assessed in the post anaesthetic care unit (PACU) at 30mins post-operatively. This will be required in order for the patient to be deemed to have an 'effective' nerve block and be entered into the study. Patients reporting pain at this point will be removed from the study and offered either a rescue brachial plexus block or alternative analgesia. (Published research by Riazi et al and by McNaught et al, indicates that 5mls of local anaesthetic solution is adequate for establishing an effective ISBPB in this immediate post-operative period).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Significant respiratory disease including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or unstable asthma
2. Renal or hepatic impairment
3. Allergy to local anaesthetic
4. Opiod tolerance (more then 30mg of morphine or its equivalent per day)
5. Body mass index \> 40
6. Body weight \< 56kg (due to potentially toxic doses of local anaesthetic drug if using higher volume of 0.75% concentration at below this weight)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Royal Surrey County Hospital

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gillian Foxall, MBChB, MA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Surrey County Hospital

Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gillian Foxall, MBChB, MA

Role: CONTACT

07917865767

Michele N Kigozi, BMedSci,BMBS

Role: CONTACT

07977165224

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Urmey WF, Talts KH, Sharrock NE. One hundred percent incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis associated with interscalene brachial plexus anesthesia as diagnosed by ultrasonography. Anesth Analg. 1991 Apr;72(4):498-503. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199104000-00014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2006740 (View on PubMed)

Riazi S, Carmichael N, Awad I, Holtby RM, McCartney CJ. Effect of local anaesthetic volume (20 vs 5 ml) on the efficacy and respiratory consequences of ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):549-56. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen229. Epub 2008 Aug 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18682410 (View on PubMed)

McNaught A, Shastri U, Carmichael N, Awad IT, Columb M, Cheung J, Holtby RM, McCartney CJ. Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for interscalene block. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Jan;106(1):124-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq306. Epub 2010 Nov 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21059701 (View on PubMed)

al-Kaisy AA, Chan VW, Perlas A. Respiratory effects of low-dose bupivacaine interscalene block. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Feb;82(2):217-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/82.2.217.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10364997 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

11/LO/0934

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.