Sub Omohyoid Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Nerve Block

NCT ID: NCT05796778

Last Updated: 2023-10-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-04-01

Study Completion Date

2023-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Shoulder surgery can be very painful surgery after which the use of opioids is often required. The well-known side-effects of opioids (e.g. respiratory depression, somnolence, nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) limit their use in so called 'fast track' surgery and anaesthesia programmes.

the study aimed to compare the effect of sub omohyoid suprascapular nerve block versus interscalene nerve block in preventing postoperative pain and decreasing analgesic consumption in patients scheduled for shoulder surgery

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain Regional Anesthesia Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

subomohyoid suprascapular nerve

superficial probe of ultrasound was placed in the transverse plane to visualize the superior trunk in the short axis. The suprascapular nerve was identified as it branched off from the superior trunk and traced until it coursed beneath the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

subomohyoid plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The block needle was inserted in line with the probe in a lateral-to-medial orientation toward the suprascapular nerve. Local anesthetic solution was then injected after negative aspiration for blood to achieve circumferential spread around the neurovascular bundle

Interscalene brachial plexus

ultrasound-guided interscalene block involves imaging the C5 and C6 roots at approximately the level of the cricoid cartilage, just distal to where they emerge from behind their respective transverse processes and where they lie in the groove between the anterior and middle scalene muscles

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene brachial plexus block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The block needle is usually advanced in plane in a lateral-to-medial direction through the middle scalene muscle to contact the nerve roots and inject local anesthetic around them.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

subomohyoid plane block

The block needle was inserted in line with the probe in a lateral-to-medial orientation toward the suprascapular nerve. Local anesthetic solution was then injected after negative aspiration for blood to achieve circumferential spread around the neurovascular bundle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interscalene brachial plexus block

The block needle is usually advanced in plane in a lateral-to-medial direction through the middle scalene muscle to contact the nerve roots and inject local anesthetic around them.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Aged 18-60 years.
2. ASA I-II.
3. Both sexes.
4. Shoulder surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient refusal
2. Allergy to local anesthetics
3. BMI \>40 kg/m2
4. Bleeding diathesis or history of anticoagulant use.
5. Psychiatric diseases.
6. Infection of the skin at the site of needle punctures area.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Minia University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hassan Mokhtar Elshorbagy Hetta

lecturer of anesthesia and ICU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

hassan m. hetta, lecturer

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Minia University, faculty of medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Minia University Hospital

Minya, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

hassan m. hetta, lecturer

Role: CONTACT

1010901114 ext. 0020

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

hassan m. hetta, lecturer

Role: primary

1010901114 ext. 0020

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

685/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block
NCT06074471 RECRUITING NA