Sub Omohyoid Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Nerve Block
NCT ID: NCT05796778
Last Updated: 2023-10-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-01
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
the study aimed to compare the effect of sub omohyoid suprascapular nerve block versus interscalene nerve block in preventing postoperative pain and decreasing analgesic consumption in patients scheduled for shoulder surgery
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Diaphragm Sparing Effect of Subomohyoid Block With Infraclavicular or Subscapularis Blocks in Comparison With Interscalen Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Shoulder Surgeries
NCT05920421
Pericapsular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Nerve Block for Acute Pain Management in Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT05788367
Anterior Glenoid Nerve Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries
NCT06765278
Interscalene Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Block and Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
NCT05768009
Circumflex Nerve Blocks Versus Posterior Cord Nerve Blocks in Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT04446403
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
subomohyoid suprascapular nerve
superficial probe of ultrasound was placed in the transverse plane to visualize the superior trunk in the short axis. The suprascapular nerve was identified as it branched off from the superior trunk and traced until it coursed beneath the inferior belly of the omohyoid muscle.
subomohyoid plane block
The block needle was inserted in line with the probe in a lateral-to-medial orientation toward the suprascapular nerve. Local anesthetic solution was then injected after negative aspiration for blood to achieve circumferential spread around the neurovascular bundle
Interscalene brachial plexus
ultrasound-guided interscalene block involves imaging the C5 and C6 roots at approximately the level of the cricoid cartilage, just distal to where they emerge from behind their respective transverse processes and where they lie in the groove between the anterior and middle scalene muscles
Interscalene brachial plexus block
The block needle is usually advanced in plane in a lateral-to-medial direction through the middle scalene muscle to contact the nerve roots and inject local anesthetic around them.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
subomohyoid plane block
The block needle was inserted in line with the probe in a lateral-to-medial orientation toward the suprascapular nerve. Local anesthetic solution was then injected after negative aspiration for blood to achieve circumferential spread around the neurovascular bundle
Interscalene brachial plexus block
The block needle is usually advanced in plane in a lateral-to-medial direction through the middle scalene muscle to contact the nerve roots and inject local anesthetic around them.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. ASA I-II.
3. Both sexes.
4. Shoulder surgery.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Allergy to local anesthetics
3. BMI \>40 kg/m2
4. Bleeding diathesis or history of anticoagulant use.
5. Psychiatric diseases.
6. Infection of the skin at the site of needle punctures area.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Minia University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hassan Mokhtar Elshorbagy Hetta
lecturer of anesthesia and ICU
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
hassan m. hetta, lecturer
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Minia University, faculty of medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Minia University Hospital
Minya, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
685/2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.