Shoulder Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Shoulder Surgery
NCT ID: NCT05755802
Last Updated: 2024-03-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-06-05
2024-03-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Shoulder Surgery
NCT05772533
A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Shoulder Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Bock for Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries: Double Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT05982951
Comparison Between Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT06235879
Post-Operative Analgesic Efficacy Of Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Combined Suprascapular And Axillary (Circumflex) Nerve Block For Patients Undergoing Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT05791058
Pericapsular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Nerve Block for Acute Pain Management in Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT05788367
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of this study:
assess the quality of pain relief in patients who will undergo arthroscopic shoulder surgeries receiving either shoulder block versus PENG block comparing and evaluating the differences between the two techniques.
Sample Size Calculation:
Sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 11.0.4 for windows (2011) with time to first analgesic request as the primary outcome. Using the results published by Pani et al 2019 with the mean time to first analgesic request in shoulder block group was (5.9 ± 1.2 hours) Using a two-sided two-sample unequal-variance t-test, sample size of 40 patients is needed to achieve 90% power to detect 20 % difference in time to first analgesic request. Using a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of 0.05. A 10% drop out is considered, so a total of 46 patients will be enrolled (23 in each group) in this study.
Methods:
The study will be conducted in Mansoura university hospital on Forty six patients who will be scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia. They will be randomly assigned to two equal groups (PENG group and shoulder block group) according to computer-generated table of random numbers using the permuted block randomization method. The group allocation will be concealed in sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelopes which will be opened only after obtaining the written informed consent. A written informed consent will be obtained from all study subjects after ensuring confidentiality. The study protocol will be explained to all patients after enrollment into the study along with VAS after enrollment into the study. Basic demographic characters including age, sex, and weight will be recorded. In both groups, The PENG and shoulder block procedures will be performed in the preoperative regional room under strict aseptic conditions using 30 ml 0.25% bupivacaine.
Statistical Methods:
The collected data will be coded, processed, and analyzed using SPSS(Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) program (version 22) for Windows. Normality of numerical data distribution will be tested by Shapiro-Wilk test. Continuous data of normal distribution will be presented as mean ± SD(standard deviation) and compared with the unpaired student's t test. Non-normally distributed data will be presented as median (range) and compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. Repeated measures ANOVA will be used for comparisons within the same group. Categorical data will be presented as number (percentage) and compared with the Chi-square test. All data will be considered statistically significant if P value is ≤ 0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group A (PENG block)
Ultrasound-guided PENG block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions and patient's arm will be placed in external rotation and abducted at 45 degrees.
PENG block
A linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally between the coracoid and the humeral head. After defining the humeral head, the tendon of the subscapular muscle and the deltoid muscle over it, the needle will be inserted using the "in plane" technique. When the needle will have passed through the deltoid muscle and touched the subscapularis tendon, a bone-like hard tissue will be felt and the needle could not be advanced further. The needle tip will be placed between the deltoid muscle and subscapularis tendon, and the injectate will be slowly administered.
Group B (Shoulder block)
Ultrasound-guided shoulder block will be performed under strict aseptic precautions with patient in semi-recumbent position with the operating arm on the contra-lateral shoulder.and then, the patients will be positioned in a semi-recumbent position with the arm slightly flexed and adducted at the elbow for axillary nerve block.
Shoulder block
The probe will be kept over the scapular spine to identify the trapezius and the supraspinatus muscle. Then, it Will be moved laterally to identify the concavity of the supraspinatus fossa and the hyper-echoic fascia of the supraspinatus muscle. In the concavity of the fossa, the suprascapular artery and the suprascapular nerve run in close proximity. A 50 mm nerve block needle will be used in the long axis view for the block. After confirming extravascular placement of the needle, injectate will be given below the supraspinatus fascia and then during axillary nerve block,The posterior surface of the humerus will be visualised in the short axis view. So, the circumflex artery will be visualised longitudinally. After confirming extra-vascular placement of the needle, injectate will be given into space.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
PENG block
A linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally between the coracoid and the humeral head. After defining the humeral head, the tendon of the subscapular muscle and the deltoid muscle over it, the needle will be inserted using the "in plane" technique. When the needle will have passed through the deltoid muscle and touched the subscapularis tendon, a bone-like hard tissue will be felt and the needle could not be advanced further. The needle tip will be placed between the deltoid muscle and subscapularis tendon, and the injectate will be slowly administered.
Shoulder block
The probe will be kept over the scapular spine to identify the trapezius and the supraspinatus muscle. Then, it Will be moved laterally to identify the concavity of the supraspinatus fossa and the hyper-echoic fascia of the supraspinatus muscle. In the concavity of the fossa, the suprascapular artery and the suprascapular nerve run in close proximity. A 50 mm nerve block needle will be used in the long axis view for the block. After confirming extravascular placement of the needle, injectate will be given below the supraspinatus fascia and then during axillary nerve block,The posterior surface of the humerus will be visualised in the short axis view. So, the circumflex artery will be visualised longitudinally. After confirming extra-vascular placement of the needle, injectate will be given into space.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for elective unilateral shoulder arthroscopy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Altered mental status or un-cooperative patients.
* History of known sensitivity to the used anesthetics.
* Bleeding or coagulation diathesis.
* Infection or redness at the injection site.
* Significant cardiac dysfunction, hepatic, or renal impairment.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Amany Hazem abdelmaksood EL-deeb
Lecturer of anesthesia, ICU & pain management; Faculty of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Amany H EL-Deeb, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mansoura University
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sahin A, Baran O, Cetin MU, Gultekin A, Arar MC. Combined suprascapular nerve block and axillary nerve block approach vs. peri-articular infiltration analgesia for postoperative pain management following arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022 Dec;26(24):9117-9125. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202212_30661.
Sripada R, Bowens C Jr. Regional anesthesia procedures for shoulder and upper arm surgery upper extremity update--2005 to present. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2012 Winter;50(1):26-46. doi: 10.1097/AIA.0b013e31821a0284.
Casas Reza P, Dieguez Garcia P, Gestal Vazquez M, Sampayo Rodriguez L, Lopez Alvarez S. Pericapsular nerve group block for hip surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Apr;86(4):463-465. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14166-X. Epub 2020 Jan 28. No abstract available.
van Erp JHJ, Ostendorf M, Lansdaal JR. Shoulder surgery in beach chair position causing perioperative stroke: Four cases and a review of the literature. J Orthop. 2019 May 27;16(6):493-495. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.05.009. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
Kapukaya F, Ekinci M, Ciftci B, Atalay YO, Golboyu BE, Kuyucu E, Demiraran Y. Erector spinae plane block vs interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia management in patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy. BMC Anesthesiol. 2022 May 12;22(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12871-022-01687-5.
Kupeli I, Yazici Kara M. Anesthesia or analgesia? New block for shoulder surgery: pericapsular nerve group block. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep-Oct;72(5):669-672. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 9.
Pani N, Routray SS, Pani S, Mallik S, Pattnaik S, Pradhan A. Post-operative analgesia for shoulder arthroscopic surgeries: A comparison between inter-scalene block and shoulder block. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 May;63(5):382-387. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_65_19.
Patel MS, Abboud JA, Sethi PM. Perioperative pain management for shoulder surgery: evolving techniques. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Nov;29(11):e416-e433. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.049. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PENGB for shoulder surgery
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.