Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block

NCT ID: NCT04899388

Last Updated: 2023-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

69 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-01

Study Completion Date

2022-02-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

assess and compare the efficacy of pericapsular nerve group block wersus lumber erector spinae plane block in reducing postoperative pain within the first 24 hours after hip surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

after being informed about the study and potential risks. All patients giving written consent will be randomized by double blind manner into 3groups each one containing 23 patients ,PENG group (n =23 ): The patients will receive Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) before positioning for spinal anesthesia.

ESPS group E (n =23 ): The patients will receive Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block before positioning for spinal anesthesia.

Control group C(n =23 ): patients received spinal anesthesia without any block.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pericapsular Nerve Group Block (PENG Block) Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers
douple

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PENG

the patients lied in the supine position. The probe was originally placed in a transverse plane above the anterior superior iliac spine in the ipsilateral surgical site and then counterclockwise rotated about 45 degrees to line up with the pubic ramus. The iliopubic eminence, iliopsoas muscle and tendon, femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were all visible in this view. By an in-plane technique, from lateral to medial, a 22-gauge, 80-mm needle was placed in the musculofascial plane between both the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly .The local anesthetic medication was delivered after negative aspiration while looking out for proper fluid distribution for a total volume of 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pericapsular Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

regional anaesthia

ESPB

TThe patient was positioned at the lateral decubitus posture in the ipsilateral surgical site. The convex USG transducer was moved from the midline to the side of the operation and positioned 4-6 cm lateral to the L3 spinous process in a longitudinal parasagittal plane. The needle was advanced using the in-plane superior-to-inferior approach. The needle was advanced with the tip introduced up to the plane anterior to the "erector spinae muscle" and the posterior surface of the L3 transverse process. 0.5-1 ml of normal saline was administered for hydrodissection and to ensure proper placement .If there was any resistance during administering local anesthesia, the needle was modified by drawing it back a few millimeters. the prepared local anesthetic solution 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25 % was delivered through the point between both the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

regional anaesthia

control

patients received spinal anesthesia without any block

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Fentanyl

Intervention Type DRUG

intavenous

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pericapsular Nerve Block

regional anaesthia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block

regional anaesthia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Fentanyl

intavenous

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

PENG LESB

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Aged 65 to 75 years old. American Society of anesthesiologists physical status II and III. Body mass index of 25 to 30 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria

Altered mental status. History of trauma or multiple fractures Uncontrolled hypertension and or diabetes. Coagulopathy. Preexisting advanced kidney, liver, or heart disease. Allergies or contraindications to the study drugs. Chronic use of opioids or corticosteroids.
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Zagazig University

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marwa Mohamed Medhat

lecture of anesthesia and surgical intensive care (Principal Investigator)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Howida A kamal, M.D

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

zagazig U

Marwa m Medhat, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

zagazig U

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aculty of Medicine,Zagazig University

Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6818

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.