Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block Versus Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
NCT ID: NCT04899388
Last Updated: 2023-06-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
69 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-06-01
2022-02-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of PENG Block as a Part of Multimodal Analgesia Following Hip Surgeries.
NCT06916000
Efficacy of Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Hip Surgeries
NCT06144931
PENG and LFCN Block Versus Lumbar Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia After Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT05652075
Comparing Postoperative Pain After Pericapsular Nerve Block and Fascia Iliaca Block in Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT06003738
Combined Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Block in Patients Undergoing Hip Surgeries
NCT05930171
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
ESPS group E (n =23 ): The patients will receive Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block before positioning for spinal anesthesia.
Control group C(n =23 ): patients received spinal anesthesia without any block.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PENG
the patients lied in the supine position. The probe was originally placed in a transverse plane above the anterior superior iliac spine in the ipsilateral surgical site and then counterclockwise rotated about 45 degrees to line up with the pubic ramus. The iliopubic eminence, iliopsoas muscle and tendon, femoral artery, and pectineus muscle were all visible in this view. By an in-plane technique, from lateral to medial, a 22-gauge, 80-mm needle was placed in the musculofascial plane between both the psoas tendon anteriorly and the pubic ramus posteriorly .The local anesthetic medication was delivered after negative aspiration while looking out for proper fluid distribution for a total volume of 20 mL of Bupivacaine 0.25%
Pericapsular Nerve Block
regional anaesthia
ESPB
TThe patient was positioned at the lateral decubitus posture in the ipsilateral surgical site. The convex USG transducer was moved from the midline to the side of the operation and positioned 4-6 cm lateral to the L3 spinous process in a longitudinal parasagittal plane. The needle was advanced using the in-plane superior-to-inferior approach. The needle was advanced with the tip introduced up to the plane anterior to the "erector spinae muscle" and the posterior surface of the L3 transverse process. 0.5-1 ml of normal saline was administered for hydrodissection and to ensure proper placement .If there was any resistance during administering local anesthesia, the needle was modified by drawing it back a few millimeters. the prepared local anesthetic solution 20 ml bupivacaine 0.25 % was delivered through the point between both the transverse process and the erector spinae muscle
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
regional anaesthia
control
patients received spinal anesthesia without any block
Fentanyl
intavenous
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pericapsular Nerve Block
regional anaesthia
Lumbar Erector Spinae Plane Block
regional anaesthia
Fentanyl
intavenous
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
65 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zagazig University
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marwa Mohamed Medhat
lecture of anesthesia and surgical intensive care (Principal Investigator)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Howida A kamal, M.D
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
zagazig U
Marwa m Medhat, M.D
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
zagazig U
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Aculty of Medicine,Zagazig University
Zagazig, Sharqia Province, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6818
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.