A Comparative Study Between Ultrasound Guided Shoulder Block and Pericapsular Nerve Group Bock for Shoulder Arthroscopic Surgeries: Double Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT05982951

Last Updated: 2024-05-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-08-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Shoulder arthroscopic surgeries are one of the most common procedures performed daily in our practice. The arthroscopic techniques offer a less invasive option as Open repair does not offer a significantly better 2-year result in terms of stability, and furthermore, can negatively affect the recovery of the full range of motion of the shoulder. Open techniques Shoulder procedures are performed arthroscopically nowadays with fewer complications compared with open surgery.

Indications of shoulder arthroscopy are expanding and include biceps tears, labral tears, rotator muscle tears, subacromial impingements chondral injuries, loose bodies, early degenerative changes, adhesive capsulitis, shoulder instability and acromioclavicular osteoarthritis.

There are many regional anesthetic techniques used to control perioperative pain during arthroscopic procedures. Interscalene block results in effective shoulder surgery analgesia, but it is associated with various complications such as diaphragmatic paralysis due to the high incidence of phrenic nerve block.

The suprascapular nerve block combined with the axillary nerve block is non-inferior to conventional inter-scalene block except for the early recovery period with the advantage of lower incidence of dyspnea and discomfort.

. In a cadaveric anatomical study that the posterosuperior quadrant and the posteroinferior quadrant of the GHJ were innervated by the suprascapular nerve and the axillary nerve respectively. While the anterosuperior quadrant portion of the joint is sensory supplied by the subscapularis superior branch and the anteroinferior by the main branch of the axillary nerve. These anatomical data the possibility of a new block targeting the GHJ sensory branches. It was suggested that deep pericapsular infiltration of local anesthetic towards the subscapularis may cover the axillary and subscapularis branches that feed the anteroinferior and superior quadrants of the GHJ.

Recently, the pericapsular nerve group block of the shoulder joint as described in a case series including two cases underwent a humeral neck fracture fixation and Bankart arthroscopic repair with promising anesthesia and analgesia in selected shoulder surgeries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

anesthetics Bleeding disorders receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs local infection at the site of local injection Intra articular infections

Sample size and methodology:

We will enroll 42 patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroscopy. They will be randomized and allocated into two groups; Group A and Group B. Group A will receive an ultrasound-guided PENG block and Group B will receive a shoulder block Sample size justification The sample size was calculated using Power Analysis and Sample Size software program (PASS) version 11.0.4 for Windows (2011) with time to first analgesic request as the primary outcome. Using the results published by Pani et al 2019 (8) with the mean time to first analgesic request in the shoulder block group was (5.9 ± 1.2 hours) Using a two-sided two-sample unequal-variance t-test, a sample size of 42 patients is needed to achieve 95% power to detect 20 % difference in time to a first analgesic request by using a two-sided hypothesis test with a significance level of 0.05.

Anticipated Results The application of pericapsular nerve group block in patients undergoing elective shoulder arthroscopic surgeries may improve the management of their perioperative pain.

Randomization:

The study subjects will be randomized by using block randomization using sealed concealed envelopes into two groups.

Data collection:

The patients will be observed for 24 hours postoperatively by a blinded investigator for the given block. All patients will receive one gram of acetaminophen intravenously every 8 hours as a part of the multimodal analgesia protocol.

The primary outcome will be the duration of analgesia (time to first rescue analgesia after administration of the block). Postoperative pain will be assessed using a 100 mm vertical visual analog score (VAS). The pain score will be recorded at 0, 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours at rest (VASr) and movement (VASm). Morphine will be given intravenously if VASr, VASm, or both exceed 30mm in one milligram allequate with 5 minutes intervals till VAS is less than 30 mm or exceeds the safety dose of 30 mg in 4 hours.

Secondary outcomes:

Total fentanyl consumption as a rescue analgesia intraoperatively. Total morphine consumption in 24 hours postoperatively. Intraoperative hemodynamics mean arterial pressure and mean heart rate. length of stay in hospital Ability to perform physical rehabilitation program in the first 24 hours postoperatively.

postoperative sedation score using the Ramsey score patient satisfaction will be assessed by numerical score (1= very dissatisfied, 2= dissatisfied, 3=neither satisfied or dissatisfied, 4= satisfied, 5=very satisfied) postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be assessed using a 4 points numerical score (0=no PONV, 1= mild nausea, 2= severe nausea or vomiting once, 3= vomiting more than once)

Endpoint:

The observation of patients will be finished 24 hours postoperatively.

Results:

It will be recorded and analyzed statistically.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Efficacy of PENG Block Managing Perioperative Pain With Shoulder Arthroscopy Surgeries Efficacy of Shoulder Block in Managing Perioperative Pain With Shoulder Arthroscopy Surgeries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The block will be performed by one investigator who is not participating in either data collection or analysis. Also the patient will be blinded .

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shoulder PENG block group

Ultrasound-guided peri-capsular nerve block of the shoulder with 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine between the supraspinatus muscle and deltoid muscle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Shoulder PENG block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound guided insertion of a needle between subscapularis tendon and deltoid with injection of 10 mi 0.25% bupivacaine after confirming right plane of injection

Shoulder block

ultrasound guided axillary nerve block and suprascapular nerve block posterior approach with 10 ml 0.25% bupivacaine (total 20ml)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Shoulder PENG block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound guided insertion of a needle between subscapularis tendon and deltoid with injection of 10 mi 0.25% bupivacaine after confirming right plane of injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shoulder PENG block

Ultrasound guided insertion of a needle between subscapularis tendon and deltoid with injection of 10 mi 0.25% bupivacaine after confirming right plane of injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Shoulder Block

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ASA I - II
* Age between 18 - 60
* unilateral elective shoulder arthroscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Altered mental status or un-cooperative patients
* Hypersensitivity to local anesthetics
* Bleeding disorders
* receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulant drugs
* local infection at the site of local injection
* Intra articular infections
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

General Committee of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, Egypt

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kareem Mikhamer

Fellow lecturer of Anaesthesia

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ahmed Maher Teaching Hospital

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rockwood CA Jr. Shoulder arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1988 Jun;70(5):639-40. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3392055 (View on PubMed)

Severud EL, Ruotolo C, Abbott DD, Nottage WM. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A long-term retrospective outcome comparison. Arthroscopy. 2003 Mar;19(3):234-8. doi: 10.1053/jars.2003.50036.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12627146 (View on PubMed)

Farmer KW, Wright TW. Shoulder arthroscopy: the basics. J Hand Surg Am. 2015 Apr;40(4):817-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2015.01.002. Epub 2015 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25726045 (View on PubMed)

Tran DQ, Elgueta MF, Aliste J, Finlayson RJ. Diaphragm-Sparing Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Surgery. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Jan/Feb;42(1):32-38. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000529.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27941477 (View on PubMed)

Neuts A, Stessel B, Wouters PF, Dierickx C, Cools W, Ory JP, Dubois J, Jamaer L, Arijs I, Schoorens D. Selective Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Plexus Block for Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Noninferiority Randomized Parallel-Controlled Clinical Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018 Oct;43(7):738-744. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000777.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29659438 (View on PubMed)

Tran J, Peng PWH, Agur AMR. Anatomical study of the innervation of glenohumeral and acromioclavicular joint capsules: implications for image-guided intervention. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jan 11:rapm-2018-100152. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100152. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30635516 (View on PubMed)

Kupeli I, Yazici Kara M. Anesthesia or analgesia? New block for shoulder surgery: pericapsular nerve group block. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2022 Sep-Oct;72(5):669-672. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 Jun 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34118263 (View on PubMed)

Pani N, Routray SS, Pani S, Mallik S, Pattnaik S, Pradhan A. Post-operative analgesia for shoulder arthroscopic surgeries: A comparison between inter-scalene block and shoulder block. Indian J Anaesth. 2019 May;63(5):382-387. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_65_19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31142882 (View on PubMed)

Grosh T, Elkassabany NM. Enhanced Recovery After Shoulder Arthroplasty. Anesthesiol Clin. 2018 Sep;36(3):417-430. doi: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.04.006.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30092938 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GeneralCTHI

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.