Suprascapular and Axillary Blocks Versus Interscalene Block for Shoulder Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02517437

Last Updated: 2018-05-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-08-31

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the combination of suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks is non-inferior to the conventional interscalene block (ISB) in providing pain relief during the first postoperative day to adult healthy patients (age \> 18) undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Hypothesis:The pain relief provided by a combination of suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks is non-inferior to that produced by the conventional interscalene block during the first 24hours postoperatively in adult patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery.

Intervention and Comparator: Consented patients will be randomized to receive either pre-operative ISB (plus sham SAB with subcutaneous saline), or SAB (plus sham ISB). Both groups will receive general anesthesia for surgery.

Primary Aim: To demonstrate non-inferiority of pain relief produced by the combination treatment compared to the conventional treatment by comparing the area under the curve of the postoperative pain scores plot over time during the first 24 hours postoperatively.

Secondary Aims: There are four secondary aims, covering efficacy (analgesia) and safety: rest pain, quality of recovery, safety, other pain relief indicators.

Design There will be a multi-centre, prospective, randomized, patient and assessor blinded, two-arm, parallel-group, 1:1 allocation ratio, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial comparing the effect of SAB treatment to conventional ISB treatment on pain relief during the first postoperative 24 hours in patients undergoing ambulatory shoulder surgery under general anesthesia.

Methods Study participants

The target population will be adult patients (age \> 18) presenting for outpatient (same day surgery) unilateral arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery. Eligible surgical procedures are:

* Shoulder arthroscopy
* Shoulder instability procedures

1. Superior labrum anterior posterior repair (SLAP)
2. Rotator cuff repair
3. Bankart repair
* Acromioplasty

Study centres The trial will be conducted at the two academic medical centres in Toronto where ambulatory shoulder surgery is routinely performed: Toronto Western Hospital (TWH),and Women's College Hospital (WCH).

Preoperative management Unless allergic, all patients will receive acetaminophen 1 gr and celecoxib 400 mg orally with sips of water one hour prior to surgery. All blocks will be performed in the block room one hour before surgery.

Suprascapular and axillary nerve blocks (SAB group) Patients allocated to the suprascapular and axillary nerve block combination (SAB group) will receive these blocks in the sitting position. The shoulder will be in the neutral position but rotated 45 degrees inward and the elbow flexed at 90 degrees while the hand rests on the knees. The suprascapular nerve will be blocked as it branches from the superior trunk.78After sterile skin preparation with chlorhexidine, a linear array transducer (6-13 MHz, Sonosite M-Turbo) probe protected by a 3M Tegaderm® dressing or a sterile sheath is placed in the transverse plane to visualize C5 and C6 roots in the interscalene groove. These roots are then traced distally to where they coalesce to form the superior trunk. The suprascapular nerve is then identified and as it emerges from the superior trunk, under the deep cervical fascia and superficial to the middle scalene muscle. After infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, a 5 cm 22 G insulated needle (B. Braun Medical Inc., Bethlehem, PA, USA) is inserted in line with the probe in a lateral-to-medial orientation towards the nerve. Local anesthetics (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will then be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration for blood to achieve circumferential spread around the nerve.

The axillary nerve block will be performed next in the posterior aspect of the operative arm. The US transducer is placed in the longitudinal plane, parallel to the long axis of the humerus shaft and approximately 2cm below the postero-lateral part of the acromion on the posterior aspect of the arm. (Figure 1) The neurovascular bundle encompassing the humeral artery, posterior circumflex artery, and axillary nerve is visualized in the lateral edge of the quadrangular space, deep to the deltoid muscle, inferior to the teres minor muscle, and superior to the triceps tendon. After infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, the 22G needle is inserted in line with the probe in a caudad orientation towards the bundle. Local anesthetics (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will then be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration to achieve circumferential spread around the bundle.

Finally, to maintain patient blinding, sham ISB block will be performed in the semi-sitting position using a 25G needle to inject 1 mL of lidocaine 1% subcutaneously.

Interscalene block (ISB group) Local anesthetic solution (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration for blood to achieve spread posterior to or between the C5 and C6 nerve roots. Subsequently, patients will receive sham SAB performed in the sitting position using a 25G needle to inject 1 mL of lidocaine 1% subcutaneously.

Block assessment Assessment of sensory block onset to confirm block success is done by the research assistant doing the blocks every 5 minutes, for 30 minutes, with a blunt 22G needle applied to skin, by comparing to the contralateral upper extremity.

General anesthesia All patients will receive a standardized general anesthetic.

Postoperative management Discharged patients will receive a prescription for Tylenol #3® as needed, or Percocet® if intolerant to codeine.

Two-week follow-up A study follow-up phone call will be arranged to specifically assess any potential block-related neurologic symptoms such as pain, paresthesia, dysesthesia, sensory loss, motor power weakness. Patients found to have such symptoms will be offered a referral to the chronic pain clinic at TWH for assessment and management.

Data collection The study coordinators of the participating sites will use a paper-based case report form (CRF) prepared by the principal investigator for documentation of outcome results. Subject confidentiality will be maintained by using a study ID (not related to name, or date of birth) on all CRFs.

Sample Size Investigators aim to enroll a total of 65 patients per group, or a total of 130 patients. Based on the annual number of shoulder surgeries performed at each centre, the researchers plan to recruit 45 patients at TWH, and another 85 patients at WCH.

Source Data Verification: Patient Electronic Record

Quality Assurance \& Data Checks: N/A

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Shoulder Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Suprascapular & axillary blocks

Suprascapular and axillary blocks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Suprascapular & axillary blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

After infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, local anesthetics (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will then be injected in 5 mL aliquots to achieve circumferential spread around the nerve.The axillary nerve block will be performed next in the posterior aspect of the operative arm. The neurovascular bundle encompassing the humeral artery, posterior circumflex artery, and axillary nerve is visualized in the lateral edge of the quadrangular space, deep to the deltoid muscle, inferior to the teres minor muscle, and superior to the triceps tendon. After infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, local anesthetics (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will then be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration to achieve circumferential spread around the bundle.

Interscalene block

Interscalene block.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene block

Intervention Type DRUG

After sterile skin preparation with chlorhexidine and infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, a 5 cm 22 G insulated needle is then inserted and local anesthetic solution (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration for blood to achieve spread posterior to or between the C5 and C6 nerve roots.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Suprascapular & axillary blocks

After infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, local anesthetics (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will then be injected in 5 mL aliquots to achieve circumferential spread around the nerve.The axillary nerve block will be performed next in the posterior aspect of the operative arm. The neurovascular bundle encompassing the humeral artery, posterior circumflex artery, and axillary nerve is visualized in the lateral edge of the quadrangular space, deep to the deltoid muscle, inferior to the teres minor muscle, and superior to the triceps tendon. After infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, local anesthetics (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will then be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration to achieve circumferential spread around the bundle.

Intervention Type DRUG

Interscalene block

After sterile skin preparation with chlorhexidine and infiltration with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine, a 5 cm 22 G insulated needle is then inserted and local anesthetic solution (20 mL of 0.5% ropivacaine) will be injected in 5 mL aliquots after negative aspiration for blood to achieve spread posterior to or between the C5 and C6 nerve roots.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Suprascapular and axillary blocks

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Consented, English-speaking, adult patients (age \> 18)
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-III
* BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

* Total shoulder arthroplasty or clavicular surgery (ISB does not provide sufficient pain relief)
* Known broncho-pulmonary or phrenic pathology compromising respiratory function
* Contra-indication to nerve blocks e.g., infection, bleeding diathesis, allergy to local anesthetics
* Existing chronic pain disorders or history of use of ≥ 30mg oxycodone or equivalent per day
* Pre-existing neurological deficits or peripheral neuropathy involving the operative upper extremity
* Contraindication to any component of multi-modal analgesia (acetaminophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, oral opioid analgesics)
* Pregnancy or any significant psychiatric conditions that may affect patient assessment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vincent Chan, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto

Faraj Abdallah, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto

Richard Brull, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Women's College Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto Western Hopspital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stark PA, Myles PS, Burke JA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. 2013 Jun;118(6):1332-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23411725 (View on PubMed)

Voogd AC, Ververs JM, Vingerhoets AJ, Roumen RM, Coebergh JW, Crommelin MA. Lymphoedema and reduced shoulder function as indicators of quality of life after axillary lymph node dissection for invasive breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2003 Jan;90(1):76-81. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4010.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12520579 (View on PubMed)

Peintinger F, Reitsamer R, Stranzl H, Ralph G. Comparison of quality of life and arm complaints after axillary lymph node dissection vs sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2003 Aug 18;89(4):648-52. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601150.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12915872 (View on PubMed)

Lo IK, Litchfield RB, Griffin S, Faber K, Patterson SD, Kirkley A. Quality-of-life outcome following hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis. A prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Oct;87(10):2178-85. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02198.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16203880 (View on PubMed)

Gutierrez DD, Thompson L, Kemp B, Mulroy SJ; Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network; Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Aging-Related Changes in Impairment for Persons Living with Physical Disabilities. The relationship of shoulder pain intensity to quality of life, physical activity, and community participation in persons with paraplegia. J Spinal Cord Med. 2007;30(3):251-5. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753933.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17684891 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REB14-8557-A

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ISB With SSNB & ANB
NCT06878391 RECRUITING NA