Effectiveness of Field Block Compared With Interscalene Block in Shoulder Surgery

NCT ID: NCT07173894

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-08-01

Study Completion Date

2026-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will compare two different types of anesthesia used for shoulder surgery. The first method, called an interscalene block, is commonly performed by anesthesiologists and is effective for pain control but may cause side effects such as breathing problems, arm weakness, or discomfort. The second method, called a shoulder field block, is a newer technique performed by orthopedic surgeons that numbs the nerves around the shoulder without affecting breathing.

Patients scheduled for shoulder surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either the interscalene block or the shoulder field block. The main goal of the study is to find out whether the shoulder field block provides pain relief that is as effective as the interscalene block, but with fewer side effects.

Pain levels, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, need for pain medication, and any complications will be recorded and compared between the two groups. The results may help identify a safe and effective alternative anesthesia option for patients undergoing shoulder surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Regional anesthesia is widely used for shoulder surgery, most commonly with an interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB). While ISB provides effective pain relief, it is associated with side effects such as hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, breathing difficulties, Horner's syndrome, nerve injury, and rebound pain. These risks limit its use in patients with respiratory conditions, obesity, or other contraindications.

A shoulder field block (FB) is a newer approach that targets the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves, which supply most of the sensation to the shoulder joint. Unlike ISB, the field block does not affect the phrenic nerve, making it a potentially safer option. Cadaveric and early clinical studies suggest that field blocks may provide effective pain relief with fewer complications, but direct comparisons with ISB in surgical patients are limited.

This randomized controlled trial will enroll 64 adult patients undergoing arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery. Patients will be randomized into two groups:

Field Block Group: Local anesthesia field block performed by an orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks.

Interscalene Block Group: Standard interscalene block performed by an anesthesiologist.

The primary outcome will be postoperative pain intensity measured by a numerical rating scale (0-10) at multiple time points during the first 48 hours. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, hospital length of stay, opioid consumption, complications, and unplanned medical visits due to pain.

The study hypothesis is that a shoulder field block will provide pain relief that is non-inferior to an interscalene block, while reducing side effects and improving patient satisfaction. If effective, this technique could offer a practical alternative that can be safely performed by orthopedic surgeons, expanding anesthesia options for shoulder surgery patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Regional Anesthesia Techniques in Shoulder Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This is a prospective, randomized, parallel-group comparative study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel Shoulder Field Block (SFB) technique performed by an orthopedic surgeon versus the standard Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block (ISB) performed by an anesthesiologist in patients undergoing shoulder surgery.

Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the SFB or ISB technique prior to surgery. The field block is performed intraoperatively after general anesthesia using anatomical landmarks, whereas ISB is performed preoperatively using ultrasound guidance. Both groups will receive the same general anesthetic protocol and standardized multimodal perioperative analgesia.

Pain scores, opioid use, complications, and satisfaction will be assessed over a 48-hour postoperative period. The study aims to assess whether the field block is non-inferior to ISB in terms of pain control while offering potential advantages such as fewer complications
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Shoulder Field Block by Orthopedic Surgeon

Participants in this arm will receive a shoulder field block performed by the orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks after induction of general anesthesia. The block targets the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves using a tumescent local anesthetic mixture of lidocaine with epinephrine, bupivacaine, and saline to provide intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. This novel technique aims to provide effective pain relief with fewer side effects compared to the standard interscalene brachial plexus block.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Shoulder Field Block by Orthopedic Surgeon

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

For Shoulder Field Block intervention:

This intervention involves a regional anesthesia technique targeting the sensory nerves of the shoulder surgical field: the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves. The block is performed intraoperatively by the orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks after induction of general anesthesia. A mixture of lidocaine with epinephrine, bupivacaine, and saline is injected into the shoulder area to provide local anesthesia and prolonged postoperative analgesia. This technique aims to spare the phrenic nerve, potentially reducing respiratory complications associated with traditional blocks.

Interscalene Block by Anesthesiologist

Participants in this arm will receive a standard interscalene brachial plexus block performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance before surgery. This block anesthetizes the upper brachial plexus nerves to provide effective intraoperative and postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery. It is the current standard of care but may be associated with side effects such as diaphragmatic paralysis and arm weakness.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Interscalene brachial plexus block and superficial cervical plexus block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

This intervention involves a standard interscalene brachial plexus block performed preoperatively by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. It anesthetizes the upper roots (C5-C7) of the brachial plexus to provide effective analgesia for shoulder surgery. While effective, it carries risks such as hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis, Horner's syndrome, and motor weakness of the ipsilateral arm due to spread to adjacent nerves.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shoulder Field Block by Orthopedic Surgeon

For Shoulder Field Block intervention:

This intervention involves a regional anesthesia technique targeting the sensory nerves of the shoulder surgical field: the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves. The block is performed intraoperatively by the orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks after induction of general anesthesia. A mixture of lidocaine with epinephrine, bupivacaine, and saline is injected into the shoulder area to provide local anesthesia and prolonged postoperative analgesia. This technique aims to spare the phrenic nerve, potentially reducing respiratory complications associated with traditional blocks.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Interscalene brachial plexus block and superficial cervical plexus block

This intervention involves a standard interscalene brachial plexus block performed preoperatively by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. It anesthetizes the upper roots (C5-C7) of the brachial plexus to provide effective analgesia for shoulder surgery. While effective, it carries risks such as hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis, Horner's syndrome, and motor weakness of the ipsilateral arm due to spread to adjacent nerves.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age between 18 and 75 years
* Scheduled for arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior surgery or trauma to the shoulder
* Revision shoulder surgery
* Fibromyalgia
* Pregnancy
* Contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., allergy to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, local site infection)
* Preexisting neuropathy or myopathy of the surgical limb
* History of chronic opioid use
* Cognitive impairment or inability to understand pain scoring systems (e.g., dementia)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rabin Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

FERAS QAWASMI

Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Rabin medical center- Hasharon hospital

Petah Tikva, Central District, Israel

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Feras Qawasmi, MD

Role: CONTACT

+972546149298

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Mustafa Yassin, Chief of the Orthopedic

Role: primary

+972505247811

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Auyong DB, Hanson NA, Joseph RS, Schmidt BE, Slee AE, Yuan SC. Comparison of Anterior Suprascapular, Supraclavicular, and Interscalene Nerve Block Approaches for Major Outpatient Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Noninferiority Trial. Anesthesiology. 2018 Jul;129(1):47-57. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002208.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29634491 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HASH-ORTHO-FBvsISB-2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.