Effectiveness of Field Block Compared With Interscalene Block in Shoulder Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07173894
Last Updated: 2025-09-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
64 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-08-01
2026-01-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients scheduled for shoulder surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either the interscalene block or the shoulder field block. The main goal of the study is to find out whether the shoulder field block provides pain relief that is as effective as the interscalene block, but with fewer side effects.
Pain levels, patient satisfaction, length of hospital stay, need for pain medication, and any complications will be recorded and compared between the two groups. The results may help identify a safe and effective alternative anesthesia option for patients undergoing shoulder surgery.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Suprascapular and Axillary Blocks Versus Interscalene Block for Shoulder Surgery
NCT02517437
Effect of Local Anesthetic Dose on Interscalene Block
NCT01701115
Interscalene Versus Costoclavicular Blocks for Shoulder Surgery
NCT06953947
Evaluation of Supraclavicular, Suprascapular, and Interscalene Nerve Blocks for Outpatient Shoulder Surgery
NCT02287142
Combined Shoulder Anterior Capsule and Suprascapular Nerve Block Versus Interscalene Block in Shoulder Surgery
NCT06519851
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A shoulder field block (FB) is a newer approach that targets the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves, which supply most of the sensation to the shoulder joint. Unlike ISB, the field block does not affect the phrenic nerve, making it a potentially safer option. Cadaveric and early clinical studies suggest that field blocks may provide effective pain relief with fewer complications, but direct comparisons with ISB in surgical patients are limited.
This randomized controlled trial will enroll 64 adult patients undergoing arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery. Patients will be randomized into two groups:
Field Block Group: Local anesthesia field block performed by an orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks.
Interscalene Block Group: Standard interscalene block performed by an anesthesiologist.
The primary outcome will be postoperative pain intensity measured by a numerical rating scale (0-10) at multiple time points during the first 48 hours. Secondary outcomes include patient satisfaction, hospital length of stay, opioid consumption, complications, and unplanned medical visits due to pain.
The study hypothesis is that a shoulder field block will provide pain relief that is non-inferior to an interscalene block, while reducing side effects and improving patient satisfaction. If effective, this technique could offer a practical alternative that can be safely performed by orthopedic surgeons, expanding anesthesia options for shoulder surgery patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the SFB or ISB technique prior to surgery. The field block is performed intraoperatively after general anesthesia using anatomical landmarks, whereas ISB is performed preoperatively using ultrasound guidance. Both groups will receive the same general anesthetic protocol and standardized multimodal perioperative analgesia.
Pain scores, opioid use, complications, and satisfaction will be assessed over a 48-hour postoperative period. The study aims to assess whether the field block is non-inferior to ISB in terms of pain control while offering potential advantages such as fewer complications
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Shoulder Field Block by Orthopedic Surgeon
Participants in this arm will receive a shoulder field block performed by the orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks after induction of general anesthesia. The block targets the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves using a tumescent local anesthetic mixture of lidocaine with epinephrine, bupivacaine, and saline to provide intraoperative and postoperative analgesia. This novel technique aims to provide effective pain relief with fewer side effects compared to the standard interscalene brachial plexus block.
Shoulder Field Block by Orthopedic Surgeon
For Shoulder Field Block intervention:
This intervention involves a regional anesthesia technique targeting the sensory nerves of the shoulder surgical field: the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves. The block is performed intraoperatively by the orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks after induction of general anesthesia. A mixture of lidocaine with epinephrine, bupivacaine, and saline is injected into the shoulder area to provide local anesthesia and prolonged postoperative analgesia. This technique aims to spare the phrenic nerve, potentially reducing respiratory complications associated with traditional blocks.
Interscalene Block by Anesthesiologist
Participants in this arm will receive a standard interscalene brachial plexus block performed by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance before surgery. This block anesthetizes the upper brachial plexus nerves to provide effective intraoperative and postoperative analgesia for shoulder surgery. It is the current standard of care but may be associated with side effects such as diaphragmatic paralysis and arm weakness.
Interscalene brachial plexus block and superficial cervical plexus block
This intervention involves a standard interscalene brachial plexus block performed preoperatively by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. It anesthetizes the upper roots (C5-C7) of the brachial plexus to provide effective analgesia for shoulder surgery. While effective, it carries risks such as hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis, Horner's syndrome, and motor weakness of the ipsilateral arm due to spread to adjacent nerves.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Shoulder Field Block by Orthopedic Surgeon
For Shoulder Field Block intervention:
This intervention involves a regional anesthesia technique targeting the sensory nerves of the shoulder surgical field: the suprascapular, axillary, and lateral pectoral nerves. The block is performed intraoperatively by the orthopedic surgeon using anatomical landmarks after induction of general anesthesia. A mixture of lidocaine with epinephrine, bupivacaine, and saline is injected into the shoulder area to provide local anesthesia and prolonged postoperative analgesia. This technique aims to spare the phrenic nerve, potentially reducing respiratory complications associated with traditional blocks.
Interscalene brachial plexus block and superficial cervical plexus block
This intervention involves a standard interscalene brachial plexus block performed preoperatively by an anesthesiologist under ultrasound guidance. It anesthetizes the upper roots (C5-C7) of the brachial plexus to provide effective analgesia for shoulder surgery. While effective, it carries risks such as hemi-diaphragmatic paralysis, Horner's syndrome, and motor weakness of the ipsilateral arm due to spread to adjacent nerves.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for arthroscopic or open shoulder surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Revision shoulder surgery
* Fibromyalgia
* Pregnancy
* Contraindications to regional anesthesia (e.g., allergy to local anesthetics, coagulopathy, local site infection)
* Preexisting neuropathy or myopathy of the surgical limb
* History of chronic opioid use
* Cognitive impairment or inability to understand pain scoring systems (e.g., dementia)
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rabin Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
FERAS QAWASMI
Orthopedic Surgeon, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hasharon Hospital, Rabin Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rabin medical center- Hasharon hospital
Petah Tikva, Central District, Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Auyong DB, Hanson NA, Joseph RS, Schmidt BE, Slee AE, Yuan SC. Comparison of Anterior Suprascapular, Supraclavicular, and Interscalene Nerve Block Approaches for Major Outpatient Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind, Noninferiority Trial. Anesthesiology. 2018 Jul;129(1):47-57. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002208.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HASH-ORTHO-FBvsISB-2025
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.