Ultrasound-Guided Infraclvicular Block Using Dexmedetomidine Versus Nalbuphine as Adjuvants to Bupivacaine in Upper Limb Orthopedic Surgery
NCT ID: NCT07279727
Last Updated: 2025-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE1
66 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-01-01
2027-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Morphine and/or Nalbuphine as Adjuvants in Ultrasound Guided Interscalene Block: for Shoulder Surgeries
NCT03034382
Dexamethasone Versus Nalbuphine as Adjuvants in Brachial Plexus Block
NCT04194320
Ultrasound Guided Infraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block Using Levo-bupivacaine Alone or Combined With Dexmedetomidine for Hand and Forearm Surgeries
NCT04729868
Peri-neural Dexmedetomidine Versus Dexamethasone for Supraaclavicular Block Adjuvant to Bupivacaine Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT04694105
Ketamine Versus Dexmedetomidine in Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
NCT04508894
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Compared with general anesthesia, regional techniques reduce postoperative pain scores, nausea, and opioid requirements, leading to faster recovery and higher patient satisfaction. They are especially valuable in orthopedic upper-limb surgeries where prolonged postoperative analgesia is desired.
For upper limb procedures, various brachial plexus approaches-interscalene, supraclavicular, infraclavicular, and axillary-are utilized depending on the surgical site. Ultrasound guidance has greatly improved the safety and success rates of these blocks by allowing direct visualization of the nerves, needle, and spread of local anesthetic (LA).
The infraclavicular approach targets the cords of the brachial plexus surrounding the axillary artery in the infraclavicular fossa. It provides dense anesthesia and analgesia for surgeries of the elbow, forearm, and hand. Advantages over the supraclavicular or axillary approaches include reliable blockade of the musculocutaneous, median, ulnar, and radial nerves with a single injection, Lower risk of pneumothorax or phrenic nerve palsy and better catheter stability for continuous analgesia .
Despite these benefits, the main limitation is the finite duration of analgesia when using local anesthetics alone. Adjuvants have been explored to extend block duration and enhance quality without increasing toxicity. Commonly used agents include opioids, clonidine, dexmedetomidine, magnesium sulfate, dexamethasone, and others.
Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α₂-adrenergic receptor agonist with sedative, anxiolytic, and analgesic properties and minimal respiratory depression.
It acts centrally through activation of α₂ receptors in the locus coeruleus inhibits norepinephrine release, producing sedation (Brummett et al., 2009) , and has peripheral action through hyperpolarization of C and Aδ nerve fibers via inhibition of sodium and potassium channels prolongs the effect of local anesthetics.
The addition of Dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to local bupivacaine in regional anesthesia has proven to : Shortens onset time of sensory and motor block, Prolongs block duration and postoperative analgesia by 3-6 hours, Reduces rescue analgesic consumption, and Provides mild sedation without respiratory depression.
However, potential adverse effects include bradycardia and hypotension related to systemic absorption, particularly at higher doses.
Nalbuphine hydrochloride is a synthetic opioid agonist-antagonist that acts predominantly as a κ-receptor agonist and µ-receptor antagonist. This pharmacologic profile provides potent analgesia with limited risk of respiratory depression, pruritus, or nausea commonly associated with pure µ-agonists such as morphine or fentanyl.
When used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics, nalbuphine is thought to: Prolong sensory and motor block duration, increase postoperative analgesia, Reduce opioid consumption, and has Minimal side effects . it produce its effects through acting on opioid receptors located on peripheral sensory nerve endings and by reducing inflammatory mediator release.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
nalbuphine group
• Patients in group N (Nalbuphine group) will receive 29 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1 mL (containing 10 mg nalbuphine)
Nalbuphine
Nalbuphine will be added to .5% bupivacaine as an adjuvant in infraclavicular nerve block
Dexmedetomidine group
• Patients in group D (Dexmedetomidine group) will receive 29 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine + 1mL (containing 75 µg dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine will be added to .5% bupivacaine as an adjuvant in infraclavicular nerve block
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nalbuphine
Nalbuphine will be added to .5% bupivacaine as an adjuvant in infraclavicular nerve block
Dexmedetomidine
Dexmedetomidine will be added to .5% bupivacaine as an adjuvant in infraclavicular nerve block
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assiut University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mo'men mostafa youssef
Lecturer of Anesthesia and icu
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Momen mostafa meki, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assiut University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of medicine Assiut University, Assiut,
Asyut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Infraclavicular nerve block
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.