Adapting Shaping Activities Into Mirror Therapy

NCT ID: NCT06766669

Last Updated: 2025-01-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-26

Study Completion Date

2024-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this case-control study is to assess the impact of a novel method which adapts shaping activities into mirror therapy to improve dexterity, reaction time, and motor learning of the non-dominant hand in healthy individuals. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does the use of Shaping Method as a protocol in Mirror Therapy will have an enhancing effect on upper extremity motor skills, motor learning and reaction time in healthy individuals.

The objective of this study is to compare the intervention group, which will undergo shaping method activities in accordance with the protocol set out in Mirror Therapy, with the control group. This will enable an assessment of the impact of this approach on dexterity, reaction time and motor learning of the non-dominant hand in healthy individuals.

Participants in intervention group will:

* Use the Shaping Method activities with mirror therapy for 4 weeks.
* Come to the exercise lab 2 times a week for 4 weeks.
* Participate in assessment tests at the beginning and end of the intervention period.

Participants in control group will:

* Take assessment tests twice, four weeks apart.
* Maintain their daily routine for the duration of their participation in the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In our study, 30 healthy adults were included in the intervention group and the same number of age- and gender-matched healthy adults were included in the control group.

The intervention group received 20-minute sessions, 2 days a week for 4 weeks. During the sessions, participants were seated with the non-dominant hand behind the mirror device and the dominant hand in front. The participants were instructed to perform the following exercises with their dominant hand for 10 repetitions in accordance with the Shaping Method: Clothespin attachment activity, Ring threading on rod, Connecting the dots, Putting pencils in the glass, Velcro board activity, Dipping fork in play dough activity, Placing the cubes in the box activity, Ball insertion into perforated plastic plate, The activity of touching colored paper placed between white papers, Geometric jigsaw activity. Participants were assessed with outcome measures before and at the end of the 4-week intervention period.

Participants in the control group received no intervention and were asked to continue their daily routines for 4 weeks. These participants were also assessed with outcome measures twice at 4-week intervals.

The SPSS 27.0 package program was used for statistical analysis. The normality of the distribution of quantitative variables was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. The demographic and clinical data were summarized as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) for the continuous variables and the number and percentage for the categorical variables. The initial measurements of the groups were compared using an independent samples t-test. A paired t-test was used to investigate intragroup differences between the pre- and post-tests. A one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was employed to determine the differences between the intervention and control groups, with baseline measurements serving as covariates. The differences between the groups were calculated based on the post-intervention assessment and the change from the pre-intervention values. The statistical significance was set to p\< 0.05, and the effect sizes were interpreted as follows: ≤ 0.2, small; around 0.5, medium; ≥ 0.8, large.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Cross-Sectional, Case-Control Study Design
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mirror Therapy Group

In this group, Shaping Method activities are added to Mirror Therapy as a protocol and applied to participants.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Shaping method activities combined with mirror therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

This intervention involves the application of exercises consisting of shaping method activities accompanied by a mirror device. It is basically an intervention consisting of exercises that require manual dexterity.

Control Group

The group that has no intervention and is asked to continue with their daily routines.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Shaping method activities combined with mirror therapy

This intervention involves the application of exercises consisting of shaping method activities accompanied by a mirror device. It is basically an intervention consisting of exercises that require manual dexterity.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Between 18-30 years old
* Dominant limb is right

Exclusion Criteria

* A history of orthopedic disease, neurological disease, and/or surgery of the upper extremities
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

30 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Marmara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu, Associate Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Marmara University, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Özlem Doğan

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Marmara University, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Alime Nur Kara

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Marmara University, Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

Sergen Öztürk, MSc

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Marmara University, Institute of Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Marmara University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Jha RK, Thapa S, Kasti R, Nepal O. Influence of Body Mass Index, Handedness and Gender on Ruler Drop Method Reaction Time among Adults. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Apr 20;18(1):108-111. doi: 10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.2545.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32335603 (View on PubMed)

Aranha VP, Moitra M, Saxena S, Narkeesh K, Arumugam N, Samuel AJ. Motor cognitive processing speed estimation among the primary schoolchildren by deriving prediction formula: A cross-sectional study. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2017 Jan-Mar;8(1):79-83. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.193544.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28149087 (View on PubMed)

Kesilmiş, İ., et al., Reaction Time in Target Shooting Sports: Perspective of Bocce and Archery. Eurasian Research in Sport Science, 2021. 6(2): p. 121-129.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Çakıt, E., B. Durgun, and M. Cetik, Assessing the Relationship Between Hand Dimensions and Manual Dexterity Performance for Turkish Dental Students. Vol. 489. 2016. 469-479.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Morris DM, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Eura Medicophys. 2006 Sep;42(3):257-68.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17039224 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1919B012210132

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

MarmaraU-FTR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.