Effects and Mechanisms of Sensory Afferent Electrostimulation on Upper Limb Function in Patients With Hemiparesis

NCT ID: NCT06536634

Last Updated: 2025-11-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2027-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal for this project is to investigate the effects of a 5-week SAES therapy in addition to conventional therapy on both behavioural (sensory and motor) and neurological measures and the underlying mechanisms of treatment response.

The goal of this project to investigate the effects of a 5-week SAES therapy in addition to conventional therapy.

The aim is to investigate whether SAES is more effective than conventional therapy alone in children with hemiparesis. The investigators will assess the efficacy of SAES using novel clinical assessment such as kinematic evaluations and modern neurophysiological measures, namely transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI).

It will be expected a benefit for children with hemiparesis after SAES training which may lead to improved bimanual and unimanual functions. Benefits have been reported in adults and in preliminary studies also in children.

Type of study: Randomised controlled clinical trial

Participants with hemiparesis will be included in the study. The study group will receive the SAES training with a glove or adhesive electrodes as a home-based training during 30 minutes per day, 5x/week, for 5 weeks, combined with conventional occupation therapy.

Researchers will compare the SAES group with a group of patients with comparable conditions who receive the prescribed conventional occupational therapy and/or physiotherapy (treatment as usual, TAU)

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Children with hemiparesis present with sensory and motor deficits, which negatively affect quality of life and decrease participation in everyday life. To date, no treatment is yet effective to decrease these impairments. A recent systematic review confirms that unimanual and bimanual trainings effectively improve upper limb function in children with hemiparesis. However, it is still challenging to find the best individual training method for children with hemiparesis, as there is much variability in treatment response.

In the present study, the effects and mechanisms of non-invasive electrostimulation of the hand, called Sensory Afferent Electrostimulation (SAES) will be investigated. SAES triggers action potentials in afferent nerve fibres leading to increased sensory afferent input in the sensorimotor regions of the brain. Through this, SAES can enhance excitability of the motor cortex and of upper limb performance. While proven effective in adults after stroke, SAES is safe with promising positive results in a very small study in children with hemiparesis. However, the investigation of efficacy of SAES on sensory and motor functions was so far neglected. Modern stimulation and imaging methods revealed that, whole-hand SAES induced increased strength of corticospinal projections and intracortical change (measured with transcranial magnetic stimulation), which may indicate long-term potentiation mechanisms. Furthermore, in a functional MRI study, SAES induced increased motor cortex activity. Hence, resting state fMRI will allow to understand the efficacy of SAES on the topographically connectivity of the motor and sensorimotor network at rest.

The experimental intervention consists of SAES with a glove or adhesive electrodes (e.g. Cefar Reha X2) at 20Hz, 300µs, intensity between 2-10mA, during 30 minutes per day, 5x/week, for 5 weeks, combined with conventional occupation therapy. The subsequent therapy sessions will take place at home, with in-between telephone checks.

The control intervention (treatment as usual, TAU) consists of the prescribed conventional occupational therapy and/or physiotherapy. The evaluation of the UL sensory and motor function will be conducted at the University Children's Hospital in Bern by blind assessors, expert in the clinical measures, and will take place before and after each intervention period and at 12-weeks follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemiparesis Unilateral Cerebral Palsy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomized controlled Bayesian phase II trial with a follow-up examination after 12 weeks mwas designed. The study participants will be recruited via the University Children's Hospital Bern and the Swiss Cerebral Palsy Registry.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SAES

Treatment group (SAES)

Interventions: Sensory afferent electrical stimulation (SAES)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SAES

Intervention Type OTHER

The experimental intervention consists of SAES with a glove or adhesive electrodes at 20Hz, 300µs, intensity between 2-10mA, during 30 minutes per day, 5x/week, for 5 weeks, combined with conventional occupation therapy. The subsequent therapy sessions will take place at home, with in-between telephone checks.

Control group

The control intervention (treatment as usual, TAU) consists of the prescribed conventional occupational therapy and/or physiotherapy.

Group Type OTHER

TAU

Intervention Type OTHER

Treatment as usual

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SAES

The experimental intervention consists of SAES with a glove or adhesive electrodes at 20Hz, 300µs, intensity between 2-10mA, during 30 minutes per day, 5x/week, for 5 weeks, combined with conventional occupation therapy. The subsequent therapy sessions will take place at home, with in-between telephone checks.

Intervention Type OTHER

TAU

Treatment as usual

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of unilateral cerebral palsy/hemiparesis, following unilateral brain lesion, e.g. perinatal/childhood stroke (acquired prior to the age of 16 years)
* consistent and stable limitation of hand functions
* chronic state (time since lesion \>2 years)
* aged 6-18 years
* parental informed consent if \<14 years, informed consent of the patient if \>14 years

Exclusion Criteria

* psychiatric disease that prevents the participant form informed participation and compliance in an adequate manner/setting
* Bilateral brain lesion
* Recent Botulinum toxin-injections injections (UL, \< 6 months)
* Hand surgery on paretic hand \< 2 years
* Trauma to UL in the last year
* Medical conditions that prevent training of the UL
* Participation in other afferent stimulation studies
* Electrical stimulation therapy in the last 6 months
* Intensive training of the UL (therapy more than 1x/week, \< 6 months)

If MRI and TMS is performed, additionally:

• MRI and TMS contradictions, such as

* implanted Metal devices (e.g. braces, implant)
* implanted shunt system
* in girls and women: pregnancy
* claustrophobia
* Active epilepsy
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Regula Everts, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Grunt Sebastian, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Nef Tobias, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

ARTORG

Wiest Roland, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Seidel Kathleen, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Inselspital

Bern, , Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Alisa Gschaidmeier, Dr. med.

Role: CONTACT

031 632 94 24

Sebastian Grunt, Prof. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

031 632 94 24

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sebastian Grunt, Prof. Dr.

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-00982

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.