Osteogenic Potential of Schneiderian Membrane

NCT ID: NCT06766292

Last Updated: 2025-08-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-27

Study Completion Date

2024-09-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Maxillary sinus augmentation is commonly performed by creating a space below the Schneiderian membrane which is further filled using autografts, bone graft substitutes, or a combination of both to allow for new bone formation. Recently, a new method called non-grafting sinus floor augmentation has been introduced as an alternative approach. This method is based on the idea of elevating the membrane and supporting it through implant insertion or the use of space-maintaining devices like titanium screws or mesh. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of new bone formation after sinus floor elevation using space maintaining resorbable pins without graft material.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A randomized control trial was performed on 14 patients with partially edentulous or free end saddle posterior maxilla. The patients were divided randomly into two groups. Both groups underwent maxillary sinus open lifting procedure and augmentation using xenograft \* as group A and in group B the sinus membrane was elevated and stabilized by resorbable pins\*\* to maintain the created space stable and without grafting. The study was a double blind one (participants and out¬come assessors were blinded throughout the study).

All the surgical procedures were carried out un¬der local anesthesia using infraorbital and posterior superior alveolar nerve block with palatal infiltration. Full thickness mucoperiosteal flap was elevated to expose the lateral wall of the maxillary sinus. Then the maxil¬lary sinus floor elevation using the lateral window technique was performed. A bone window was outlined using a no. 8 diamond bur mounted on straight hand piece with copious irrigation (sterile saline solution) with cautious taken to not penetrate the sinus membrane. The process of bone removal was done through the cortical bone to reach the membrane without perforation. Complete osteotomy along the boundary of the osseous window until the Schneiderian mem-brane. The Schneiderian membrane was carefully elevated till the desired height.

xenograft Preparation: (control group/ group A)

Xenograft was mixed with saline followed by the protocol of graft packed and compacted against inferior walls and to the sides of the antrum until the new available volume created was filled. The lateral window was covered by collagen membrane before flap closure. Resorbable pins (test group/ group B):

In the study group: 2.0 mm screws were fixed to the lateral wall of the sinus above the superior osteotomy and placed buccopalatally where the schneiderian membrane was elevated and maintained. Then the soft tissue flap was readapted and sutured using continuous and interrupted sutures (3-0 resorbable vicryl)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bone Healing Sinus Membrane Osteoginicity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Group

in this group, the patients underwent open sinus lifting surgery and augmentation of the sinuses by xenograft without any additives

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

open sinus lifting with xenograft only

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

ll Patients in this group underwent open sinus procedures to lift the sinus membrane followed by application of the xenograft as an augmentation material xenograft is used instead of autogenous bone graft to avoid the morbidity of the donor side

study group

In the study group: 2.0 mm screws were fixed to the lateral wall of the sinus above the superior osteotomy and placed buccopalatally where the schneiderian membrane was elevated and maintained.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

primary intervention

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In the study group: 2.0 mm screws were fixed to the lateral wall of the sinus above the superior osteotomy and placed buccopalatally where the schneiderian membrane was elevated and maintained. this technique will suspends the membrane in position to allow the blood clot to organized and formation of bone.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

primary intervention

In the study group: 2.0 mm screws were fixed to the lateral wall of the sinus above the superior osteotomy and placed buccopalatally where the schneiderian membrane was elevated and maintained. this technique will suspends the membrane in position to allow the blood clot to organized and formation of bone.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

open sinus lifting with xenograft only

ll Patients in this group underwent open sinus procedures to lift the sinus membrane followed by application of the xenograft as an augmentation material xenograft is used instead of autogenous bone graft to avoid the morbidity of the donor side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adult male/female patients above the age of 25.
2. Patients with one or more teeth requiring implant supported dental restoration in atrophic maxilla (unilateral or bilateral).
3. Alveolar bone height less than 4 mm at the defective site.
4. Good oral hygiene.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Medically compromised patients with conditions contraindicating surgery (eg. uncontrolled diabetics, bisphosphonate intake, radio or chemotherapy).
2. Patients with active infection at or related to the site of surgery (eg. acute sinusitis).
3. Heavy smokers.
4. Patients not indicated for an implant supported restoration at the time of enrollment (eg. active/untreated periodontal disease).
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

rehab soliman

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

rehab soliman

lecturer of oral and maxillofacial surgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

rehab soliman

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Misr International University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suez Canal University

Ismailia, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

672/2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.