Evaluation of Sinus Augmentation Bone Healing Using Autograft and Xenograft Compared to Xenograft Alone
NCT ID: NCT06247098
Last Updated: 2026-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
10 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-09-01
2028-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between PEEK With Autogenous Bone Graft and PEEK With Xenograft in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
NCT06521853
Prospective Study of Bone Augmentation With Lateral Sinus Lift and Osseointegration of Dental Implants
NCT07014085
Bone Material Comparison in Maxillary Sinus Augmentation
NCT04433117
Assessment of Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Versus Autogenous Bone Grafts : A Comparative Clinical Study in Alveolar Cleft Grafting
NCT04693559
Radiographic Assessment of Bone Gain Following Sinus Lifting With Simultaneous Implant Placement Using Crestal Approach With Membrane Control Technique for Bone Augmentation of Atrophied Maxillary Posterior Ridge
NCT06446687
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Xenograft - Autogenous 1:4
Sinus grafted with a ratio of Xenograft - Autogenous 1:4
Sinus Lift augmentation
Randomised Sinus Lift augmentation either with Xenograft - Autogenous ratio 1:4 (test) or Xenograft alone (Control)
Cone-beam computed tomography systems (CBCT)
An research only use of CBCT at visit 2 to review healing status.
Xenograft alone
Sinus grafted with Xenograft only
Sinus Lift augmentation
Randomised Sinus Lift augmentation either with Xenograft - Autogenous ratio 1:4 (test) or Xenograft alone (Control)
Cone-beam computed tomography systems (CBCT)
An research only use of CBCT at visit 2 to review healing status.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sinus Lift augmentation
Randomised Sinus Lift augmentation either with Xenograft - Autogenous ratio 1:4 (test) or Xenograft alone (Control)
Cone-beam computed tomography systems (CBCT)
An research only use of CBCT at visit 2 to review healing status.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Two stage sinus augmentations with \<5mm (Zinner, Small 2004) residual bone height in need of augmentation for implant placement
* Full maxillary edentulism or Kennedy class I or III
* 18 to 100 year old
Exclusion Criteria
* Those who self-report as pregnant or breastfeeding
* Wards of the state
* Non-Viable neonates
* Neonates of uncertain viability
* \< 18 years of age
* Refusal to participate
* Prior medical condition causing complications in bone metabolism
* Osteoporosis
* History of/or current chemotherapy
* History of/or current head and neck radiation
* Current heavy smoking \> 10 cigarettes/day
* Self-reported pregnancy or lactation
* Previous history of sinus elevation procedure
* Existing sinus pathology or pathology discovered at time of sinus augmentation or implant placement
* Absence of autogenous donor site
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tufts University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lorenzo Mordini, DDS, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tufts Univeristy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tufts University School of Dental Medicine
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Al-Moraissi E, Alhajj WA, Al-Qadhi G, Christidis N. Bone Graft Osseous Changes After Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation: A Systematic Review. J Oral Implantol. 2022 Oct 1;48(5):464-471. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-21-00310.
Al-Moraissi EA, Alkhutari AS, Abotaleb B, Altairi NH, Del Fabbro M. Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jan;49(1):107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
Barone A, Crespi R, Aldini NN, Fini M, Giardino R, Covani U. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histologic and histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005 Jul-Aug;20(4):519-25.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00004629
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.