Comparison of Two Types of Bone Grafts in Patients Who Need One of Their Front Teeth Removed and Replaced With an Implant

NCT ID: NCT06722482

Last Updated: 2024-12-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-27

Study Completion Date

2026-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two different bone graft materials (freeze-dried bone allograft, FDBA and collagen-enriched bovine xenograft, CEBX) that are routinely used for preserving the remaining bone after extraction of an anterior tooth, and before placing a dental implant. Patients will be randomly assigned to either group (flip of a coin) One group will receive FDBA material and the other group will receive CEBX (cow) material.

The study aims to examine the following main questions:

* Potential differences in linear radiographic horizontal (HRD) and vertical (VRD) ridge dimensional changes between groups after 16 weeks of healing
* Other clinical information of the treated areas and information regarding the esthetics of the dental implant that will subsequently be placed at the edentulous site as well as patient satisfaction with the treatment, will be evaluated.

The study will include 7 study visits. Study procedures will take place during the same visits as the standard of care treatments (tooth extraction and bone graft, dental implant placement, crown installation and follow-ups). Clinical information from these standard of care visits will be used for the current research study, such as:

* Demographic information
* Clinical information from intraoral photographs
* Radiographic information from cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will compare clinical, radiographic (dental cone beam computed tomography) and histologic outcomes upon tooth extraction and alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) as well as clinical, radiographic and patient-reported outcomes upon implant placement and crown fabrication at the same site.

Both bone graft materials (FDBA and CEBX) are FDA approved and are widely available in the US market and are routinely used in everyday practices and within the university.

* FDBA is produced by Community Blood Center (Community Tissue Services, Ohio, USA) (FEI: 3008808182).
* CEBX is produced by Geistlich Pharma AG (Wolhusen, Switzerland) \[501(k) #: K122894\].

Both materials will be stored and utilized based on manufacturers' recommendations and as per of Standard of Care protocols within the university.

Participants and investigators will be unaware of the envelope content and each participant will be asked to randomly pick an envelope and immediately both the participant as well as the investigator will be informed about the envelope content and, therefore, the group allocation. Eventually, participants and investigators will be aware of the group allocation, except for the investigator who will conduct all the study measurements who will remain blinded.

Upon healing, both groups will receive similar treatment as far as implant placement and crown restoration is concerned.

Interventions and procedures

The study-related interventions and procedures will more specifically include:

1. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical ridge dimensional changes as well as contour changes upon standard of care procedures (alveolar ridge preservation) through cone beam computed tomography and intraoral scanning, respectively, after 16 weeks of healing.
2. Determination of the feasibility of prosthetically driven implant placement upon standard of care evaluation of the post-healing cone beam computed tomography, at 16 weeks after ARP.
3. Histological evaluation of the healed grafted area upon grafting with frequently used bone graft materials at 16 weeks of healing.
4. Assessment of peri-implant clinical and radiographic parameters as well as crown esthetics and patient satisfaction upon 12 months from the dental implant placement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ridge Preservation Allografts Extraction, Tooth Xenograft

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

alveolar ridge preservation tooth extraction freeze-dried bone allograft collagen-enriched bovine xenograft

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

single center, pilot, randomized, clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcome assessor will be blinded in regards to group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

FDBA arm

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FDBA

Intervention Type DEVICE

Twenty five participants will receive FDBA in anterior extraction sockets as part of the alveolar ridge preservation procedure.

CEBX arm

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CEBX

Intervention Type DEVICE

Twenty five participants will receive CEBX in anterior extraction sockets as part of the alveolar ridge preservation procedure.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FDBA

Twenty five participants will receive FDBA in anterior extraction sockets as part of the alveolar ridge preservation procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

CEBX

Twenty five participants will receive CEBX in anterior extraction sockets as part of the alveolar ridge preservation procedure.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Freeze-dried bone allograft Collagen-enriched bovine xenograft

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients able to provide informed consent
* patients of 18 years of age or older at time of consent and enrollment
* patients in need of at least one anterior tooth extraction and seeking dental implant replacement
* bone on the buccal of the central/lateral incisors or canines planned for extraction that is either intact or has a dehiscence \</=5mm as determined radiographically through cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)

Exclusion Criteria

* current smokers or tobacco-product users (self-reported)
* uncontrolled diabetes (HbA1c≥7 in the last 3 months)
* pregnant and/or lactating females (self-reported)
* patients on immunosuppressants, steroids, bisphosphonates or other medications that have been related to Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw (MRONJ) as described by the American Association of Oral Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS) 2014 update
* patients with history of radiation of the head and neck
* patients with allergy to collagen, bacitracin and/or polymyxin B
* patients with religious or cultural beliefs that prohibit the use of either allograft or bovine graft material
* patients with physical and/or mental/cognitive disabilities (self-reported) or decisionally-impaired, not able to consent for themselves
* patients with untreated periodontitis
* patients with central/lateral incisors or canines requiring extraction and are adjacent to an edentulous area
* patients with central/lateral incisors or canines with buccal bone dehiscence \>5mm
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Implant Dentistry Research & Education Foundation (IDREF)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Rochester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Elli Kotsailidi

Assistant professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elli Anna Kotsailidi, DDS, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Eastman Institute for Oral Health, University of Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Eastman Institute for Oral Health

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Elli Anna Kotsailidi, DDS, MS

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 585-274-1146

Email: [email protected]

Nasser Assery, BDS, MS

Role: CONTACT

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Elli Anna Kotsailidi, DDS, MS

Role: primary

Nasser Assery, BDS, MS

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AWD00006192

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

STUDY00008216

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id