Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement
NCT ID: NCT06764654
Last Updated: 2025-07-09
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-01-01
2026-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim is to compare the accuracy obtained between dento-osseous supported and dento-mucosal supported surgical splints to place dental implants in posterior osseous ridges.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery VS Static Guided Surgery.
NCT06417788
Simplified vs Conventional Drilling Protocol for Implant Placment
NCT06780956
Clinical and Anatomical Factors Influencing Accuracy in Fully Guided Implant Placement.
NCT06255522
Autogenous Particles Harvesting During Implant Surgery
NCT06240416
Accuracy of Static Computer-assisted Implant Surgery in Distal Free-end Scenarios
NCT06404385
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Tooth supported guide
Patients who will receive implant placement using a tooth supported surgical guide.
Dental implant placement
Placement of two dental implants in the jaw.
Bone and tooth supported guide
Patients who will receive implant placement using a bone and tooth supported surgical guide.
Dental implant placement
Placement of two dental implants in the jaw.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dental implant placement
Placement of two dental implants in the jaw.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients in whom the placement of dental implants is not contraindicated.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of orofacial neurological symptoms.
* Patients treated with bisphosphonates.
* Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women undergoing contraceptive treatment.
* Signs of infection in the surgical area.
* Need for unconventional surgical procedures (e.g., split crest, vertical regeneration, block graft).
* Lack of patient cooperation.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mozo Grau Ticare
UNKNOWN
Aula Dental Avanzada
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jose Antonio Sánchez-Nicolás
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clínica Dental Esteve
Alicante, Alicante, Spain
Clínica Dental Sánchez Nicolás
Cabezo de Torres, Murcia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Maida T, Cheng HC, Ou KL, Nezu T, Endo K. Stereolithographic Surgical Guide with a Combination of Tooth and Bone Support: Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery in Distal Extension Situation. J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 5;9(3):709. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030709.
Liu R, Xia R, Zhang L, Gan X, Li C, Liu Q, Chen Z, Chen Z. The influence of guide stabilizers and their application sequences on trueness and precision of surgical guides in free end situations: An in vitro analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2024 Mar;35(3):294-304. doi: 10.1111/clr.14226. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
Kessler A, Le V, Folwaczny M. Influence of the tooth position, guided sleeve height, supporting length, manufacturing methods, and resin E-modulus on the in vitro accuracy of surgical implant guides in a free-end situation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Sep;32(9):1097-1104. doi: 10.1111/clr.13804. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
Shi Y, Wang J, Ma C, Shen J, Dong X, Lin D. A systematic review of the accuracy of digital surgical guides for dental implantation. Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Oct 25;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00507-w.
Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Bouckaert E, Eghbali A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Jun;45(6):721-732. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12897. Epub 2018 May 10.
Cho JY, Kim SB, Ryu J. The accuracy of a partially guided system using an in-office 3D-printed surgical guide for implant placement. Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Feb 26;24(1):19-27.
Raico Gallardo YN, da Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 May;28(5):602-612. doi: 10.1111/clr.12841. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
Bover-Ramos F, Vina-Almunia J, Cervera-Ballester J, Penarrocha-Diago M, Garcia-Mira B. Accuracy of Implant Placement with Computer-Guided Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cadaver, Clinical, and In Vitro Studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 January/February;33(1):101-115. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5556. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GUIDED
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.