The Double Factor Technique: a Computer-guided Implant Surgery Technique for Fully Edentulous Patients
NCT ID: NCT05512845
Last Updated: 2022-08-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
10 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-09-01
2022-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study consists in a single arm observational prospective clinical study and the aim was to assess the accuracy and patient's perception and quality of life of the "double factor" technique in treating fully edentulous patients.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accuracy of Static Computer-assisted Implant Surgery in Distal Free-end Scenarios
NCT06404385
Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery VS Static Guided Surgery.
NCT06417788
Implant/Abutment Module Stability of Original vs Compatible Connections
NCT03524872
Randomized Clinical Study Comparing Two Guided Surgery Techniques for Free-end Implant Placement
NCT06764654
Behavioral Comparison of Three Different Graft Materials to Increase Soft Tissue Thickness Around Dental Implants.
NCT04766255
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Preoperative virtual planification of dental implants on a pre-acquired cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed for each patient using the same system.
During the surgical phase, four dental implant will be placed in a fully guided approach using "the double factor technique. This technique merges the static and dynamic computer-guided surgical approach in the same surgery.
Then after the surgical procedure a PROMs questionnaire will be asked to the patients.
Finally, a postoperative CBCT will be performed and overlapped with the preoperative CBCT (with the implants planification) and implant position deviations between the planned and final position will be measured.
The study devices are CE- (Conformité Européenne, meaning European Conformity) marked products and used within their intended use.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Double factor group
Patients treated with full arch implant supported prostheses based on the All-on-four® concept. All implants were placed using the "double factor" computer assisted surgery technique, which involves combination of the static and dynamic computer assisted surgery protocols.
Double Factor technique
The "double factor" computer assisted surgery technique, involves the combination of the static and dynamic computer assisted surgery protocols to place dental implants in the same surgery.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Double Factor technique
The "double factor" computer assisted surgery technique, involves the combination of the static and dynamic computer assisted surgery protocols to place dental implants in the same surgery.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Healthy patients ASA I and II (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification)
* Over 18 years old patients
Exclusion Criteria
* Systemic or local conditions that contraindicates dental implant surgery
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Adrià Jorba García
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Adrià Jorba García
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Adrià Jorba-García, DDS, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Barcelona
Carmen Pomares-Puig, MD, DDS
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Valencia
M Angeles Sánchez-Garcés, MD, MS, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Barcelona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinica Perio&Implant
Alicante, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):214-27. doi: 10.1111/prd.12056.
Pomares-Puig C, Sanchez-Garces MA, Jorba-Garcia A. Dynamic and static computer-guided surgery using the double-factor technique for completely edentulous patients: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):852-857. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
Pomares C. A retrospective study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the 'all-on-four' or the 'all-on-six' immediate function concept using flapless computer-guided implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Summer;3(2):155-63.
Jorba-Garcia A, Gonzalez-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Double Factor
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.