The Double Factor Technique: a Computer-guided Implant Surgery Technique for Fully Edentulous Patients

NCT ID: NCT05512845

Last Updated: 2022-08-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-09-01

Study Completion Date

2022-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To overcome the limitations of the current dynamic and static Computer Assisted surgery protocols in fully edentulous patients, and combine the advantages of both approaches, a new technique has been developed, referred to as the "double factor" technique.

This study consists in a single arm observational prospective clinical study and the aim was to assess the accuracy and patient's perception and quality of life of the "double factor" technique in treating fully edentulous patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective observational clinical study. Each patient enrolled in this study will be treated using the "all on four concept" using the double factor technique.

Preoperative virtual planification of dental implants on a pre-acquired cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) will be performed for each patient using the same system.

During the surgical phase, four dental implant will be placed in a fully guided approach using "the double factor technique. This technique merges the static and dynamic computer-guided surgical approach in the same surgery.

Then after the surgical procedure a PROMs questionnaire will be asked to the patients.

Finally, a postoperative CBCT will be performed and overlapped with the preoperative CBCT (with the implants planification) and implant position deviations between the planned and final position will be measured.

The study devices are CE- (Conformité Européenne, meaning European Conformity) marked products and used within their intended use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgery, Computer-Assisted Dental Implants

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Double factor group

Patients treated with full arch implant supported prostheses based on the All-on-four® concept. All implants were placed using the "double factor" computer assisted surgery technique, which involves combination of the static and dynamic computer assisted surgery protocols.

Double Factor technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The "double factor" computer assisted surgery technique, involves the combination of the static and dynamic computer assisted surgery protocols to place dental implants in the same surgery.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Double Factor technique

The "double factor" computer assisted surgery technique, involves the combination of the static and dynamic computer assisted surgery protocols to place dental implants in the same surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dynamic and static computer assisted surgery

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Fully edentulous patients or with terminal dentition that requires an implant supported rehabilitation
* Healthy patients ASA I and II (American Society of Anesthesiologists classification)
* Over 18 years old patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Partially edentulous patients
* Systemic or local conditions that contraindicates dental implant surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Adrià Jorba García

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Adrià Jorba García

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Adrià Jorba-García, DDS, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Barcelona

Carmen Pomares-Puig, MD, DDS

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Valencia

M Angeles Sánchez-Garcés, MD, MS, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Barcelona

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Clinica Perio&Implant

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Vercruyssen M, Fortin T, Widmann G, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Different techniques of static/dynamic guided implant surgery: modalities and indications. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):214-27. doi: 10.1111/prd.12056.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25123770 (View on PubMed)

Pomares-Puig C, Sanchez-Garces MA, Jorba-Garcia A. Dynamic and static computer-guided surgery using the double-factor technique for completely edentulous patients: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):852-857. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33810850 (View on PubMed)

Pomares C. A retrospective study of edentulous patients rehabilitated according to the 'all-on-four' or the 'all-on-six' immediate function concept using flapless computer-guided implant surgery. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010 Summer;3(2):155-63.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20623040 (View on PubMed)

Jorba-Garcia A, Gonzalez-Barnadas A, Camps-Font O, Figueiredo R, Valmaseda-Castellon E. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 May;25(5):2479-2494. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03833-8. Epub 2021 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33635397 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Double Factor

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early and Late Implant Failure
NCT04270396 COMPLETED