Dental Implants Placed by Using a Drill Guide Versus Non-guided Placement. Follow-up Study

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-31

Study Completion Date

2015-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess implant outcomes, both clinical and radiological, in a randomized study on guided implant placement after 3-year follow-up, compared to non-guided treatment.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

A Study of a Surgical Guide for Dental Implantology

NCT03854162

Dental Implantation, Endosseous Dental Implants Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures +2 more

COMPLETED NA

Accuracy of Static Guided Implant Surgery: 3D-printed vs Milled Surgical Guides

NCT06819995

Dental Implant Guided Surgery Accuracy

RECRUITING NA

Dynamic Guided Implant Surgery VS Static Guided Surgery.

NCT06417788

Partially Edentulous Patients Bone Crest of at Least 10 mm Length and 6 mm Width Patients of at Least 18 Years Old

RECRUITING NA

Effectiveness of Removable Prosthesis Retained by 4 Implant-supported Locator-Attachments

NCT02380404

Edentulous Alveolar Ridge

COMPLETED

Immediate Loading and Fully Guided Surgery: Single Implants

NCT04061694

Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Implant Failure Nos

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Guided placement

implant placement with use of guide

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Non-guided placement

conventional implant placement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Astra Tech TX implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Provision of informed consent
2. An age of at least 18 year
3. Extraction socket healing for at least 6 months

Exclusion Criteria

1. Unlikely to be able to comply with study procedures
2. History of intravenous bisphosphonate treatment
3. Medical history that makes implant insertion unfavorable
4. Current pregnancy
5. Present alcohol and/or drug abuse
6. Major systemic diseases
7. Untreated, uncontrolled caries and/or periodontal disease
8. History of local irradiation
9. Need for bone grafting and/or sinus lift in the planned implant area

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes