MedDataX Logo

Evaluation of Intracanal Reinforcement with Short Composite Post in Upper Primary Incisors with Severly Carious Teeth As in Early Childhood Caries Cases Using Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT06740643

Last Updated: 2024-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

62 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-01

Study Completion Date

2026-04-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Severely damaged incisors may lead to difficulty in speech, decreased masticatory efficiency, abnormal tongue habits, subsequent malocclusions, and psychological and self-esteem problems. There are several methods mentioned in the literature for the restoration of severely decayed primary anterior teeth. The benefits of pulp therapy include: removing cavitations or defects to eliminate areas that are susceptible to caries; stopping the progression of tooth demineralization; restoring the integrity of tooth structure; preventing the spread of infection and preventing the shifting of teeth due to loss of tooth structure. The risks of pulp therapy include lessening the longevity of teeth by making them more susceptible to fracture as after removal of gross caries lesion and gaining access to the pulp the tooth become too weak, recurrent lesions, restoration failure, complications, and iatrogenic damage to adjacent teeth.

There are different techniques can be used for gaining intracanal retention in primary teeth. one of these techniques is resin composite posts.

Composite post restorations have been in used in primary teeth from 1986. They yield satisfactory results when there is normal masticatory function, a balanced diet, and hygiene control.

The evidence to support any method of intracanal reinforcement for restoring grossly broken down anterior teeth is presently lacking.

This study aims to Evaluate the intracanal reinforcement with short composite post in upper primary incisors versus no reinforcement.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Composite Post Intracanal Reinfocement

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

intracanal reinforcement with short compsite post

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intracanal reinforcement using short composite post

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

after pupectomy is done flowable composite will be applied 3mm intacanal to make a short compsite post before zircon crown aplicaction

no intracanal reinforcement

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

no intracanal reinforcement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no intracanal reinforcement using resin modified glass ionmer before zircon crown application

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intracanal reinforcement using short composite post

after pupectomy is done flowable composite will be applied 3mm intacanal to make a short compsite post before zircon crown aplicaction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

no intracanal reinforcement

no intracanal reinforcement using resin modified glass ionmer before zircon crown application

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children Criteria:

* Medically free.
* Cooperative patient.
* Age (3 - 5 years)

Incisors criteria:

• Upper primary incisors show large carious lesions.

Radiographic criteria:

• No evidence of internal/external pathologic root resorption.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Uncooperative children.

* Children with systemic disease.
* Refusal of participation in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ahmed Osama Abdelazeem

master's student at Pediatric Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rana T Brtaw, Lecturer

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Ahmed H Elkadem, professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed O Abdel Azeem, B.Sc(2018)Faculty of dentistry

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 0201145611843

Email: [email protected]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

intracanal reinforcement

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id