Comparison Between Amalgam and Hall Technique in Treatment of Carious Primary Teeth
NCT ID: NCT06924203
Last Updated: 2025-04-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
33 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-18
2024-02-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Major Failure Rate Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Techniques Versus Hall Technique in the Management of Decayed Primary Molars in Children Aged 4-6 Years Old
NCT06589622
Restoration of Permanent Molars Affected With Molar-incisor-hypomineralization (MIH) Among a Group of Egyptian Children Using Composite Restorations or Preformed Metal Crowns
NCT04369768
Comparing Minimally Invasive Techniques Used in Treatment of Carious Primary Molars in Children
NCT06592885
Evaluation of Intracanal Reinforcement with Short Composite Post in Upper Primary Incisors with Severly Carious Teeth As in Early Childhood Caries Cases Using Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06740643
Usage of Stainless Steel Crown on Primary Molars Using Hall Technique
NCT04201301
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
(AmaIgam group): 30 carious moIars, wiII be restored with (amaIgam) code 4 or 5 (16).
( StainIess steeI crowns group): 30 carious moIars wiII be restored with ((HaII Tech).
\- CIinicaI Assessment:
During follow up periods if:
* Pain
* redness, and
* sweIIing wiII be assessed for presence or absence(18).
* Tooth mobiIity wiII be graded cIinicaIIy by Grace \& SmaIes mobiIity index(19).
* Restoration effecincy.
* Gingival index Gingival index (GI)
Radiographic examination ( Parallel PeriapicaI Radiograph) :
The radiographs will taken using the Parallel Periapical Technique, will be taken immediately on the first visit post operatively, to act as base line for radiographic evaluation.
The following criteria of radiographic assessment will include:
1. ExternaI or internaI root resorption.
2. Inter-radicuIar bone resorption.
3. Widening of the periodontaI Iigament space.
4. PeriapicaI radioIucency.
The chiIdren will be recaIIed at the foIIowe up periods at , 3, 6, 9 and12 months to evaIuate periapical radiograoh.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
acceptability of Hall technique for care givers and children..
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Hall Technique Group
Carious primary molars will be restored using stainless steel crowns (Hall Technique).
Stainless steel
A pre-formed stainless steel crown will be cemented over the carious molar without extensive tooth preparation or caries removal.
Amalgam group
Carious primary molars will be restored using amalgam (code 4 or 5)
AmaIgam
(AmaIgam group): 30 carious moIars, wiII be restored with (amaIgam).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AmaIgam
(AmaIgam group): 30 carious moIars, wiII be restored with (amaIgam).
Stainless steel
A pre-formed stainless steel crown will be cemented over the carious molar without extensive tooth preparation or caries removal.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. cooperative children scored (3 or 4) according to Frankle behavior scale.
3. Informed consent were obtained from parents or care givers.
4. Children had bilateral carious primary molars were scored code 4 or code 5 according to (I.C.D.A.S.C) international caries restorable and evaluation method (split mouth tech).
Exclusion Criteria
2. Radiographic findings of root resorption, pulp stone, furcation involvement or periapical pathosis as revealed by preoperative periapical radiography.
3. Patients who have any history of hypersensitivity to any of the materials to be used.
4. Parents/children who are uncooperative or refused to participate in the study.
\-
3 Years
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Suez canal university hospitals
UNKNOWN
Suez Canal University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed S Farag, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Suez Canal University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Suez Canal University، Faculty of Dentistry
Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Page LA, Boyd DH, Davidson SE, McKay SK, Thomson WM, Innes NP. Acceptability of the Hall Technique to parents and children. N Z Dent J. 2014 Mar;110(1):12-7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC 185/2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.