Comparison Between Amalgam and Hall Technique in Treatment of Carious Primary Teeth

NCT ID: NCT06924203

Last Updated: 2025-04-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-18

Study Completion Date

2024-02-22

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

compare between amalgam restoration and hall technique for treatment of decayed primary molars and intervention treatment for decayed primary molars in children, age 3-5 years using split mouth technique in the same child, conventional amalgam restoration and use Stainless steel crown in other side

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study wiII be conducted on 30 chiIdren: The moIars wiII be treated by spIit mouth technique.

(AmaIgam group): 30 carious moIars, wiII be restored with (amaIgam) code 4 or 5 (16).

( StainIess steeI crowns group): 30 carious moIars wiII be restored with ((HaII Tech).

\- CIinicaI Assessment:

During follow up periods if:

* Pain
* redness, and
* sweIIing wiII be assessed for presence or absence(18).
* Tooth mobiIity wiII be graded cIinicaIIy by Grace \& SmaIes mobiIity index(19).
* Restoration effecincy.
* Gingival index Gingival index (GI)

Radiographic examination ( Parallel PeriapicaI Radiograph) :

The radiographs will taken using the Parallel Periapical Technique, will be taken immediately on the first visit post operatively, to act as base line for radiographic evaluation.

The following criteria of radiographic assessment will include:

1. ExternaI or internaI root resorption.
2. Inter-radicuIar bone resorption.
3. Widening of the periodontaI Iigament space.
4. PeriapicaI radioIucency.

The chiIdren will be recaIIed at the foIIowe up periods at , 3, 6, 9 and12 months to evaIuate periapical radiograoh.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Active Comparator:Amalgam group for decayed primary molars Experimental: Hall technique for restore decayed primary molars split mouth technique.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Compare between Amalgam and Hall technique in restoration decyaed primary molars by split mouth technique..

acceptability of Hall technique for care givers and children..

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hall Technique Group

Carious primary molars will be restored using stainless steel crowns (Hall Technique).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Stainless steel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

A pre-formed stainless steel crown will be cemented over the carious molar without extensive tooth preparation or caries removal.

Amalgam group

Carious primary molars will be restored using amalgam (code 4 or 5)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AmaIgam

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

(AmaIgam group): 30 carious moIars, wiII be restored with (amaIgam).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AmaIgam

(AmaIgam group): 30 carious moIars, wiII be restored with (amaIgam).

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Stainless steel

A pre-formed stainless steel crown will be cemented over the carious molar without extensive tooth preparation or caries removal.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

AmaIgam group Hall Technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Apparently healthy children aged from 3-5 years old of both sexes.
2. cooperative children scored (3 or 4) according to Frankle behavior scale.
3. Informed consent were obtained from parents or care givers.
4. Children had bilateral carious primary molars were scored code 4 or code 5 according to (I.C.D.A.S.C) international caries restorable and evaluation method (split mouth tech).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Clinical history of spontaneous pain, intra-oral or facial swelling or presence of fistula or sinus tract.
2. Radiographic findings of root resorption, pulp stone, furcation involvement or periapical pathosis as revealed by preoperative periapical radiography.
3. Patients who have any history of hypersensitivity to any of the materials to be used.
4. Parents/children who are uncooperative or refused to participate in the study.

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Suez canal university hospitals

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Suez Canal University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed S Farag, Professor

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Suez Canal University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Suez Canal University، Faculty of Dentistry

Ismailia, Ismailia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Page LA, Boyd DH, Davidson SE, McKay SK, Thomson WM, Innes NP. Acceptability of the Hall Technique to parents and children. N Z Dent J. 2014 Mar;110(1):12-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24683915 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REC 185/2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Time of Treatment in HALL Technique Vs ART
NCT06594770 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA