Comparing Hall vs Conventional Technique in Placing Preformed Metal Crowns From Sudan

NCT ID: NCT03640013

Last Updated: 2018-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

103 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-02-01

Study Completion Date

2018-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Preformed metal crowns (PMCs) have high success rates in restoring primary molars in children but they were not generally used by dentists, especially in developing countries due to its demand of high clinical skills with the conventional technique (CT). The biological approach, Hall technique (HT), requires less training and can be placed by less experienced dental operators including therapists. Previous studies were mainly carried out in developed countries. The aims were to investigate and compare the efficacies and cost-effectiveness of PMCs placed by these two techniques.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A prospective randomised control trial design was used. The study was carried out in a dental practice in Sudan, an under-developed country with lower social economic group. Children between 5-8 years were invited and selected if they met the inclusion criteria. Only those who had 1-2 carious primary molars needing PMCs were randomised. The PMCs were placed by a dentist in the CT arm and by a therapist in the HT arm. The children were follow up every 6 months up to 2 years. The demographic details, periodontal health, occlusion, children anxieties, and procedure time were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier survival rates for each arm were calculated. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated using the results and the local salaries

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Caries, Dental

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Controlled randomized clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hall Technique

The intervention involves removal from the primary molar and a preformed metal crown is placed using glass ionomer. The subject is then asked to bite until crown is seated. No occlusal adjustment is carried out.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hall Technique PMC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hall Technique primary fitted crowns to restore carious primary molars

Conventional Technique

The procedure involves administering local anesthetic and the intervention involves remoal of caries from the affected primary molar. The tooth is then reshaped and contoured to to enable a preformed metal crown placement. Occlusal and marginal fit is improved by crimping the metal crown to improve fit. The preformed metal crown is cemented with glass ionomer restorative material and occlusion finally checked. The subject is then asked to bite on a cotton roll for two minutes until the cement has set.

Group Type OTHER

Hall Technique PMC

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hall Technique primary fitted crowns to restore carious primary molars

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hall Technique PMC

Hall Technique primary fitted crowns to restore carious primary molars

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy children with Class I or class II carious primary molars

Exclusion Criteria

* Had a compromised medical history
* Were pre- or un-cooperative to have clinical examinations
* Lived in remote villages and were unlikely to return for follow-up
* Had teeth with pain or sepsis
* Had teeth with caries extended in pulp either from clinical or radiographic examinations
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Khartoum Centre for Research and Medical Training

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fadil Elamin

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr Yousra, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Khartoum

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Innes NP, Ricketts D, Chong LY, Keightley AJ, Lamont T, Santamaria RM. Preformed crowns for decayed primary molar teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 31;2015(12):CD005512. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005512.pub3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26718872 (View on PubMed)

Loe H. The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index Systems. J Periodontol. 1967 Nov-Dec;38(6):Suppl:610-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1967.38.6.610. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 5237684 (View on PubMed)

Buchanan H, Niven N. Validation of a Facial Image Scale to assess child dental anxiety. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002 Jan;12(1):47-52.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11853248 (View on PubMed)

Elamin F, Abdelazeem N, Salah I, Mirghani Y, Wong F. A randomized clinical trial comparing Hall vs conventional technique in placing preformed metal crowns from Sudan. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 3;14(6):e0217740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217740. eCollection 2019.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31158253 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KhartoumCentre

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Time of Treatment in HALL Technique Vs ART
NCT06594770 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA