Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
152 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-18
2027-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Does early extubation of hypoxemic patients reduce the total duration of ventilatory support (both invasive and non-invasive) by 36 hours? Does early extubation of hypoxemic patients increase the number of ventilator-free days by day 28? Can the safety of early extubation in hypoxemic patients be ensured by confirming no significant differences in rates of reintubation, tracheostomy, or mortality? The trial will compare ventilatory outcomes between two groups: hypoxemic patients who undergo early extubation (hypoxemic extubation group) and those who remain on invasive ventilation until hypoxemia resolves (conventional extubation group).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-Invasive Ventilation Versus High-flow Nasal Oxygen in Intensive Care Units
NCT05686850
PREoxygenation for the Intubation of Hypoxemic Patients: Comparison of Standard Oxygenation, High Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy, and NonInvasive Ventilation
NCT01782430
Performance of the Variation in Arterial Lactatemia During a Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) in the Prediction of Extubation Failure
NCT05487573
EXtubation With SUctioning or With Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Intensive Care Unit
NCT05147636
ONE-HOUR POSITIVE PRESSURE VENTILATION AFTER A PRESSURE SUPPORT SPONTANEOUS BREATHING TRIAL: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
NCT07324460
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several studies have found no link between patient oxygenation and extubation success, where outcomes for hypoxemic and non-hypoxemic patients are similar. Isolated hypoxemia thus does not appear to be a predictor of reintubation.
Hypoxemia is very common following major surgery, primarily due to shunts caused by atelectasis. Treatment for these atelectasis includes airway pressurization, bronchial secretion drainage, mobilization, and reducing factors that lead to diaphragmatic dysfunction.
In patients on invasive mechanical ventilation, secretion drainage is impaired, and mobilization to a seated position is more challenging. It has also been shown that diaphragmatic dysfunction occurs with prolonged ventilation. Hypoxemia can therefore be sustained by invasive ventilation, increasing the risk of therapeutic escalation.
Current guidelines do not account for the widespread use of non-invasive assistance techniques (such as high-flow oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation) that are now routinely employed in intensive care. These techniques allow for adequate oxygenation with high patient comfort and good tolerance.
Prolonging invasive ventilation in hypoxemic patients, as recommended by guidelines, could lead to associated complications. In contrast, early extubation of patients with hypoxemia may reduce the duration of both invasive and non-invasive ventilation, as well as complications related to prolonged invasive ventilation, without increasing the risk of reintubation.
Compared to continuing mechanical ventilation until hypoxemia is corrected, extubating purely hypoxemic patients and transitioning them to non-invasive ventilation techniques could represent a significant improvement in patient care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
hypoxemic extubation group
Randomized patients exhibit relative hypoxemia, defined by an SpO2 ≤ 90% while receiving 6 liters of oxygen or FiO2 of 40%. They must not have severe hypoxemia, defined as an SpO2 \< 86% while receiving 9 liters of oxygen or FiO2 of 50%. Additionally, they must not show clinical signs of poor tolerance to the spontaneous breathing trial. Patients randomized to the "hypoxemic extubation group" are extubated despite the presence of relative hypoxemia after one hour of reventilation. Following extubation, a non-invasive oxygenation strategy is initiated, alternating between non-invasive ventilation and high-flow oxygen therapy for a minimum of 24 hours.
early extubation of hypoxemic patients
patient extubated after the spontaneous ventilation trial despite the presence of hypoxemia defined by SpO2 ≤ 90% either in T-piece under 6 L/min, or under FiO2 = 40% if SBT is performed in spontaneous ventilation with minimal inspiratory assistance.
conventional extubation group
Patients in the conventional extubation group also present with relative hypoxemia, defined as an SpO2 ≤ 90% on 6 liters of oxygen or FiO2 of 40% at the time of randomization, but they will only be extubated after correction of this hypoxemia. In practice, patients in the conventional extubation group are not extubated after randomization and continue on invasive ventilation. A new spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) can be performed between 2 and 6 hours after randomization, and if unsuccessful, it may be repeated daily at the discretion of the clinician. Patients in the conventional extubation group will only be extubated when their SpO2 exceeds 90% during an SBT conducted on 6 liters of oxygen or FiO2 of 40%.
After extubation, a non-invasive oxygenation strategy will be initiated, alternating between non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high-flow oxygen therapy, for a minimum of 24 hours.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
early extubation of hypoxemic patients
patient extubated after the spontaneous ventilation trial despite the presence of hypoxemia defined by SpO2 ≤ 90% either in T-piece under 6 L/min, or under FiO2 = 40% if SBT is performed in spontaneous ventilation with minimal inspiratory assistance.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient having granted free, informed and written consent to participate in the study;
* Patient with hypoxemia defined as SpO2 ≤ 90% under 6 L/min or FiO2 40% during spontaneous breathing trial.
Exclusion Criteria
* Presence of severe hypoxemia during SBT defined by SpO2 below 86% under 9 L/min or FiO2 = 50%;
* Presence of poor clinical tolerance of SBT defined by polypnoea above 30/min, agitation, sweating, hypertension (PAS above 180 mmHg), tachycardia (HR above 140 bpm) or arrhythmia;
* Presence of an ineffective cough or major bronchial congestion;
* Patient already included in a type 1 interventional research protocol (RIPH1), modifying the procedure for ventilatory weaning and/or ventilatory support after extubation;
* Anatomical factors precluding the use of NIV or high-flow oxygen therapy, notably facial or cervico-facial malformations;
* Tracheostomized patient;
* History of obstructive ventilatory disorders with indication for NIV post-extubation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) GOLD score III/IV;
* History of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome with equipment;
* cardiogenic pulmonary edema;
* Patient on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at the time of inclusion;
* Patient under guardianship or curatorship;
* Minor patients;
* Patient deprived of liberty or under court protection;
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women;
* Patient in therapeutic limitation with decision not to re-intubate.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
centre hospitalier Victor Dupouy
Argenteuil, , France
CHRU de Besançon
Besançon, , France
Marie Lannelongue Hospital
Le Plessis-Robinson, , France
Hôpital Saint Eloi, CHU Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
CHU la pitié salpêtrière
Paris, , France
CHU la pitié salpêtrière
Paris, , France
CHU la pitié Salpêtrière
Paris, , France
Institut mutualiste Montsouris
Paris, , France
réanimation polyvalente hopital saint joseph groupe hospitalier Paris saint Joseph
Paris, , France
hôpital george Pompidou
Paris, , France
CHU de Reims
Reims, , France
Centre Cardiologique Du Nord
Saint-Denis, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stephan F, Barrucand B, Petit P, Rezaiguia-Delclaux S, Medard A, Delannoy B, Cosserant B, Flicoteaux G, Imbert A, Pilorge C, Berard L; BiPOP Study Group. High-Flow Nasal Oxygen vs Noninvasive Positive Airway Pressure in Hypoxemic Patients After Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2331-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.5213.
Quintard H, l'Her E, Pottecher J, Adnet F, Constantin JM, De Jong A, Diemunsch P, Fesseau R, Freynet A, Girault C, Guitton C, Hamonic Y, Maury E, Mekontso-Dessap A, Michel F, Nolent P, Perbet S, Prat G, Roquilly A, Tazarourte K, Terzi N, Thille AW, Alves M, Gayat E, Donetti L. Experts' guidelines of intubation and extubation of the ICU patient of French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (SFAR) and French-speaking Intensive Care Society (SRLF) : In collaboration with the pediatric Association of French-speaking Anaesthetists and Intensivists (ADARPEF), French-speaking Group of Intensive Care and Paediatric emergencies (GFRUP) and Intensive Care physiotherapy society (SKR). Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Jan 22;9(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0483-1.
Perkins GD, Mistry D, Gates S, Gao F, Snelson C, Hart N, Camporota L, Varley J, Carle C, Paramasivam E, Hoddell B, McAuley DF, Walsh TS, Blackwood B, Rose L, Lamb SE, Petrou S, Young D, Lall R; Breathe Collaborators. Effect of Protocolized Weaning With Early Extubation to Noninvasive Ventilation vs Invasive Weaning on Time to Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Respiratory Failure: The Breathe Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Nov 13;320(18):1881-1888. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13763.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-A00535-42
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.