RUT vs. Molecular Testing for H. Pylori

NCT ID: NCT06684860

Last Updated: 2025-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-11-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The rapid urease test (RUT) is frequently performed for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in clinical practice. The RUT is a simple and inexpensive method that utilizes a commercial kit containing urea and a pH indicator such as phenol red. In the presence of H. pylori urease, urea is hydrolyzed to ammonia, which raises the pH of the medium, and changes the color of the kit from yellow to magenta or pink. The sensitivity and specificity of RUT were reported to range between 80-100% and 97-99%, respectively. When endoscopy is performed, RUT is known as the first-line method used for H. pylori diagnosis. However, RUT is an indirect test method, and has the disadvantage of causing false positivity due to other urease-producing bacteria.

To date, gold standards for H. pylori diagnosis are culture and histological examination Because H. pylori is a rather fastidious and slow-growing bacterium, antimicrobial susceptibility testing using culture methods is time-consuming (10-14 days) and requires specific expertise. Recently, dual priming oligonucleotide (DPO)-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was developed to diagnose H. pylori infection. Moreover, molecular testing can identify point mutations related to clarithromycin resistance. It can be performed in a standard thermocycler and takes only 4 h to complete. The concordance rate between conventional clarithromycin susceptibility testing and DPO-PCR was excellent up to 95%. However, there was no comparison study between RUT and molecular testing for H. pylori diagnosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators aim to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the RUT and molecular testing, and identify clinical factors associated with the discordant results between the two methods.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

H.Pylori Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

RUT group

The rapid urease test (RUT) was performed for diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

No interventions assigned to this group

Molecular test group

DPO-PCR testing was performed for diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Gastroscopy can be performed
* H. pylori test and pathological analysis can be performed

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 20 or \> 80 years
* Anemia (serum hemoglobin level \< 10 g/dL)
* Severe systemic disease
* Advanced chronic liver disease
* Use of certain medications, including proton pump inhibitors, H2- receptor antagonists, or antibiotics
* History of H. pylori eradication
* Drug allergy to antibiotics
* History of gastric surgery
* Recent history of upper gastrointestinal bleeding
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Soonchunhyang University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jun-Hyung Cho

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jun-Hyung Cho, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Soonchunhyang University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Digestive Disease Center, Soonchunhyang University Hospital

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jun-Hyung Cho, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+82-2-709-9202 ext. 9581

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jun-Hyung Cho, M.D.

Role: primary

+82-2-709-9202

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCH-HP-2024-12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.