A Study of Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation As a Noxious Stimulus for the Glasgow Coma Scale

NCT ID: NCT06681779

Last Updated: 2024-11-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-31

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether electrical stimulation can be used to replace physical stimulation to test awareness of patients with impaired consciousness. Physical stimulation can cause bruising, damaged nails and ribs, and other damage with repeated testing, and electrical stimulation may be safer and cause less distress with time. This device has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For patients enrolled in this study, the study doctor or study staff will give non-invasive electrical stimulation to measure response. Depending on what study group, the study team may apply this stimulation several times at one (Phase 1) or two (Phase 2) separate time points approximately 2 hours apart (when GCS would normally be collected as part of clinical care). In addition to GCS using normal physical stimulation, the study team will test responses to electrical stimulation. To do this, electrodes (special wired stickers that conduct electricity) will be placed on the forehead, finger, and toe. Stimulation will be applied to one area at a time by connecting the electrode to a stimulator. For each physical and electrical stimulation, response will be measured (such as flinching, opening eyes, making sounds, etc.). The goal is to create electrical stimulation patterns that cause the same response as the physical exam without causing any physical damage.

A video recording will also be taken of the participant's telemetry unit (the screen showing their heart rate and other vital signs throughout the study. This video, in addition to the information from the participant's medical record, is to make sure that there are no unexpected changes in vital signs during the study. The participant will not be visible on this video.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Comatose

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

E2

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of E2, eyes opening to pain

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

E1

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of E2, eyes non-responsive to pain

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Upper Extremity M5

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M5, localizing, in at least one upper limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Upper Extremity M4

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M4, withdrawing, in at least one upper limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Upper Extremity M3

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M3, flexing, in at least one upper limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Upper Extremity M2

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M2, extending, in at least one upper limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Upper Extremity M1

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M1, no response to stimuli, in at least one upper limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Lower Extremity M4

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M4, withdrawing, in at least one lower limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Lower Extremity M3

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M3, flexing, in at least one lower limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Lower Extremity M1

Patients with a stable GCS subscore of M1, no response, in at least one lower limb

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Standard of Care (SOC)

Intervention Type OTHER

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation will be used to create noxious stimuli for the GCS exam

Intervention Type DEVICE

Standard of Care (SOC)

Physical pain stimulation, as used in traditional standard care, will be used to score the GCS exam, and the device results will be compared to this SOC exam.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient is admitted to the Barrow Neurological Institute's neuro ICU
2. Patient is in a comatose state, which is defined as a patient who is both non-responsive and has a GCS eye or motor response sub-score that requires noxious stimulation
3. Age greater than or equal to 18 years
4. Patient has an available surrogate decision maker with the capacity to consent for participation in a research study

Exclusion Criteria

1. A neurologic decline immediately prior to study participation that requires urgent or emergent workup or management\*
2. Patients in whom the frequency or extent of neurologic assessments is being limited due to concern that noxious stimulation may provoke intracranial hypertension, cardiorespiratory instability, or other adverse events
3. Patients with an implantable or external pacemaker that is currently in use
4. Ongoing refractory cardiorespiratory instability
5. Pregnant females
6. Prisoners
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Markey Olson

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Markey Olson

Program Manager

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brandon M Fox, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Barrow Neurological Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Barrow Neurological Institute

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-500-265-30-06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.