Suturing Techniques for Vesico-urethral Anastomosis

NCT ID: NCT06670924

Last Updated: 2024-11-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-07

Study Completion Date

2024-08-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the most common curative treatment for prostate cancer (PCa).Vesicourethral anastomosis (VUA) is a crucial step and either a conventional interrupted (IS) or a running (RS) suture is employed during radical prostatectomy (RP). Certainly, both RS and IS have advantages and limitations. The metanalysis revealed that potential advantages for RS compared to IS, especially for short-term outcomes such as catheterization time, extravasation rate, and anastomotic suture time. There were no significant differences for long-term outcomes (continence, incidence of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis). Generally, the exciting evidence suggests that CS should be preferred over IS. However, this should be followed only if it is technically feasible and appropriate regarding the surgical approach. Both techniques seem to be safe and appropriate for the VUA, and the technique should be chosen based on individual experience and preference.

The investigators hypothesized that RS and IS may have different effects on voiding function and flow rate, even if they do not cause an anastomotic stenosis requiring intervention. Furthermore, there is no existing literature that compares RS and IS in terms of voiding function.This article focuses on one year uroflowmetric voiding parameters, urinary function (UF), and UF related bother function, urinary continence recovery as well as other secondary outcomes, including surgical parameters, perioperative morbidity and oncological outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The investigators conducted a two-group, parallel-design, pragmatic study of 70 consecutive patients with clinically localised (pT1-pT2) PCa undergoing primary open RP by a well-experienced single surgical team at Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital as a tertiary care institution .The optimal sample size for this study was calculated to be 70 patients (35 patients in each arm) by the power calculation (α = 0.05, β = 0.1, power: 90%) The subjects were randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups using a simple randomization procedure that involved computer-generated random numbers in Microsoft Excel.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Data were collected by an independent database administrator and stored in a password-protected Microsoft Excel file. The data files were not accessible to the surgical team or to residents or ancillary staff involved in postoperative care.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Running suture (RS)

Running suture technique for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Running suture for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The surgical technique of the RS followed the description of Van Velthovens, was applied with slight modifications. Two 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were used. The first needle is started from bladder neck at 3 o'clock, and terminated in the urethra at 9 o'clock. After completion of the posterior anastomosis, a transurethral catheter is placed. The second sutures' needle is passed from the bladder at 9 o'clock and ended in the urethra at 3 o'clock. The bladder neck and urethra are merged by gentle traction of the anterior and posterior sutures at 3 and 9 o'clock.

Interrupted suture (IS)

Interrupted suture technique for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

interrupted suture for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The technique described by Walsh for interrupted anastomotic suturing was applied with minor modifications. Six 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were placed at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 o'clock to accomplish the vesicourethral anastomosis.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Running suture for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

The surgical technique of the RS followed the description of Van Velthovens, was applied with slight modifications. Two 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were used. The first needle is started from bladder neck at 3 o'clock, and terminated in the urethra at 9 o'clock. After completion of the posterior anastomosis, a transurethral catheter is placed. The second sutures' needle is passed from the bladder at 9 o'clock and ended in the urethra at 3 o'clock. The bladder neck and urethra are merged by gentle traction of the anterior and posterior sutures at 3 and 9 o'clock.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

interrupted suture for vesico-urethral anastomosis in open radical prostatectomy

The technique described by Walsh for interrupted anastomotic suturing was applied with minor modifications. Six 3/0 absorbable monofilament (polydioxanone) sutures were placed at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 o'clock to accomplish the vesicourethral anastomosis.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of clinically localised (pT1-pT2) prostate cancer
* must select the open radical prostatectomy procedure as a treatment option.

Exclusion Criteria

* History of acute urinary retention
* History of urethral stricture
Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kartal City Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Utku Can

Assistant professor of urology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Utku Can

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kartal Dr Lutfi Kirdar City Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Health Sciences Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital

Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

kartalcity_ucan_001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Better in Better Out Cystectomy.
NCT06694649 NOT_YET_RECRUITING