EFFICACY of INTRAOPERATIVE ARISTA POLYSACCHARIDE APPLICATION on the POSTOPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS in PATIENTS UNDERGOING RARP for the TREATMENT of PROSTATE CANCER

NCT ID: NCT06822036

Last Updated: 2025-02-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

362 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-01-16

Study Completion Date

2027-01-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background and aim of the study: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most commonly used treatment options for localized prostate cancer (PCa). Blood loss and deterioration of erectile function is, however, a common unwanted side effect of RP. Previous series demonstrated that the robot-assisted RP (RARP) approach is associated with lower blood-loss rates than open RP. However, several factors might contribute to higher blood loss rates at RARP: First, ileus still represents a major complication. To further reduce complication rates of postoperative ileus most high-volume centers lower the intraabdominal pressure during RARP, which in turn might lead to higher estimated blood loss rates. Second, to improve functional outcomes such as erectile function and early recovery of urinary continence, many surgeons perform intrafascial nerve sparing, which is considered a dissection that follows the periprostatic fasica and allows a whole-thickness preservation of the neurovascular bundles. Ideally, many surgeons aim to avoid thermal application in favor of optimal nerve sparing quality. Moreover, partial or complete secondary resection in context of intraoperative frozen section protocols such as NeuroSafe might further increase risk of blood loss. Taken together, to enable best balance between low intraabdominal pressure as primary prevention of postoperative ileus, maximum nerve sparing quality (i.e. intrafascial approach) and low blood loss rates, atraumatic and athermal hemostatic measures such as polysaccharide application are needed. Thus, we perform a multicenter randomized controlled prospective study with superiority trial design, in which such hemostat agent is applied to the neurovascular bundle areas. We examine if such agent leads to a relevant clinical improvement indicated by higher postoperative hemoglobin levels compared to the control group. As an exploratory co-primary endpoint of interest, we examine erectile function after RARP. Erectile dysfunction (ED) after RP is caused by several different mechanisms and commonly multifactorial. However, one of the main reasons for ED after RP is injury to the cavernous nerves during surgery. Currently, nerve-sparing surgical approaches are commonly performed, if oncologically appropriate, to minimize postoperative potency decline. Notwithstanding improvements of nerve-sparing techniques, a certain degree of nerve damage during surgery is inevitable. In order to keep the rates of postoperative ED at a minimum, it is reasonable to stabilize the cavernous nerves during surgery. In a previous pilot conducted by Chedid et al, the polysaccharide ARISTA™ AH was applicated on the cavernous nerves during robot-assisted RP (RARP) to optimize hemostasis. Later analysis of the study results revealed unexpectedly high potency rates in those men. This observation raised the question, if ARISTA™ AH may have the potential to stabilize the cavernous nerves and thus ameliorate postoperative potency rates. As the previous study by Chedid et al was originally not designed for this endpoint and did not have a control group, we are planning to evaluate this question as a meaningful exploratory co-primary endpoint in the same study cohort.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer (Adenocarcinoma) Blood Loss, Postoperative Erectile Function

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm B - no periooperative application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH

No perioperative application of ARISTA™ AH to the prostate bed and neurovascular bundles at the end of the surgery; no other hemostyptic agent in aforementioned area; (ARISTA™ AH application outside of aforementioned areas are allowed; e.g. to the fossa obturatoria)

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Arm A - periooperative application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH

Perioperative application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH to the prostate bed and neurovascular bundles during and at the end of the surgery to control bleeding and oozing in accordance with labelled directions; no other hemostyptic agent in aforementioned area

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Arm A - Application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Perioperative application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH to the prostate bed and neurovascular bundles during and at the end of the surgery to control bleeding and oozing in accordance with labelled directions; no other hemostyptic agent in aforementioned area

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Arm A - Application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH

Perioperative application of 5g of ARISTA™ AH to the prostate bed and neurovascular bundles during and at the end of the surgery to control bleeding and oozing in accordance with labelled directions; no other hemostyptic agent in aforementioned area

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age range ≥ 45 to ≥68 yrs
* Biopsy proven prostate cancer treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
* Intrafascial nerve sparing surgery (unilaterally or bilaterally)
* Preoperative urinary continence
* Group A Preoperative unassisted International Index of Erectile function (IIEF)-5 score range 8-16 (i.e. moderate (8-11) and mild to moderate (12-16))

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe intellectual limitations preventing to fully understand the study concept and its content
* High risk prostate cancer (PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml or biopsy Gleason-Score ≥ 8 or suspected T4)
* Suspected bone or visceral metastases at preoperative imaging Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy
* Any prior local therapy of the prostate (including subvesical deobstruction or radiation therapy)
* Any prior chemotherapy or colon/rectal surgery
* Any prior pelvic trauma that required surgical intervention
* Depression or other psychological or neurological disease (dementia, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder etc.)
* Peyronie's disease
* Polyneuropathia
* IPSS Score \>19 and QoL \>3
* Bilateral secondary (complete or partial) resection of the neurovascular bundle
* No contraindications for phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor intake (i.e. suited for most penile rehabilitation regimes)
* Any endocrine function disorder (not including diabetes)

SURGICAL AND PERIOPERATIVE EXLUSION CRITERIA:

* Accessory pudendal arteries (APA) preservation, if an APA is identified
* For a) nerve sparing and b) controlling bleeding in the area of the prostate bed and neurovascular bundles after prostate removal, no monopolar thermal application are allowed but suturing and clip application is allowed. For secondary resection of the neurovascular bundle and controlling bleeding, mono- or bipolar thermal application, clip application and suturing is allowed.
* No surgical revision within 7d after RARP (Clavien Dindo classified complication ≥3b)
* No definitive anastomotic partial or complete rupture (identified via cystogram within 30d after RARP)
Minimum Eligible Age

45 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

68 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Becton, Dickinson and Company

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Leipzig

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Antonius Hospital Gronau

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, PD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Klinik für Urologie, Urologische Onkologie und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Martini Klinik am UKE GmbH

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

St. Antonius-Hospital Gronau GmbH, Klinik für Urologie, Urologische Onkologie und Roboter-assistierte Chirurgie

Gronau, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status RECRUITING

Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie des Universitätsklinikums Leipzig

Leipzig, Saxony, Germany

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, PD. Dr.

Role: CONTACT

+49741051305

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, PD.

Role: primary

+49741051305

Katarina Urbanova, Dr. rer. nat

Role: primary

+4925629157154

Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah, PD

Role: backup

Sigrun Holze, Dr.

Role: primary

+49 341 97 17629

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023-601-f-S

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.