Evaluation of Hemostatic Agents in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy

NCT ID: NCT03528057

Last Updated: 2019-07-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-18

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to evaluate whether Hemostatic Agents (HA) make a significant clinical difference in patient outcomes when used for Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy (RALPN). The result of this trial will determine whether HAs are necessary for use during RALPN or if they can be omitted from the surgical tools available during this procedure. This study has a direct clinical implication on a patient's outcomes following RALPN, specifically whether patients will have better, worse, or unchanged outcomes with RALPN if HAs are used.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Partial nephrectomy is a surgical procedure wherein a diseased segment of a kidney is surgically removed, leaving behind the remaining healthy kidney parenchyma. This surgical procedure is typically performed to remove mass lesions suspicious for malignancy. A major goal of partial nephrectomy is to spare as much renal function as possible by preserving the healthy portion of the kidney while removing only the pathologic portion of the kidney.

Hemostatic agents (HA) are devices commonly used during robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) due to the risk of bleeding posed by incising a highly vascular organ. The use of various HAs as part of the surgical technique for RALPN is well-described. Potential benefits such as lower blood loss, lower rate of urine leak, and lower blood product transfusion rates have been suggested in small case series. However, larger prospective studies have failed to demonstrate these benefits of HAs. They report similar patient outcomes regardless of HA use. However, these studies are subject to selection bias given the lack of randomization, and they had a small relative number of partial nephrectomies performed without HAs.

To the knowledge of the investigators, no randomized trials have addressed the use of HAs in RALPN. Randomized, controlled trials for partial hepatectomy and knee arthroplasty have shown no benefit when using hemostatic agents to control bleeding.

At the home institution for this study, surgeons routinely use HAs in the resection bed during RALPN. Available, FDA approved, commercial agents include Floseal and Nu-KnitĀ®. Each unit of HA costs $150 - $419 per unit, and often multiple units are used during a given procedure. The hospital is paid a set amount based on the patient's insurance for performing the procedure regardless of use of HA. The use of HAs therefore increases costs incurred by the hospital when performing these procedures. It is imperative to determine if this expenditure is justified.

The primary aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes in patients undergoing RALPN with and without the use of hemostatic agents. Given the small nature of and conflicting information from the aforementioned cohort studies, it is imperative to remove selection bias and perform a randomized comparison of HA use. This study will provide a much more definitive head-to-head comparison of the overall utility of HAs. Additionally, it may provide more information about differential patient selection for more appropriate and judicious use of HAs. No study has evaluated differential patient selection for HA use, and therefore any finding in this realm would be novel.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Hemostatic Agents Renal Malignant Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
The surgical team and the patient will be blinded as to which arm the patient will be assigned both at the time of recruitment in the clinic and at the start of surgery. The patient and surgeon will both be blinded at the start of the surgery (RALPN). The surgeon will be informed intra-operatively during the renorrhaphy portion of the procedure as to which arm the patient will be assigned, at which point he will be un-blinded. Following completion of the entire surgery, the patient will also be informed as to which arm he/she was randomized upon request.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Patients undergoing RALPN with the use of HAs by a surgeon.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hemostat

Intervention Type DEVICE

Hemostatic agents, if used at all during surgery, will be applied laparoscopically into the tumor bed to stop bleeding. The type of hemostat will be decided by the surgeon according to the anatomy of the tumor bed.

Group 2

Patients undergoing RALPN without the use of HAs by a surgeon

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hemostat

Hemostatic agents, if used at all during surgery, will be applied laparoscopically into the tumor bed to stop bleeding. The type of hemostat will be decided by the surgeon according to the anatomy of the tumor bed.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Surgicel Nu-Knit FLOSEAL Hemostatic Matrix

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female patients aged 18 years and older.
* Patients must have a solid or cystic renal mass suspicious for malignancy by imaging with ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
* Patients must be initially scheduled RALPN as opposed to radical nephrectomy or other techniques for partial nephrectomy such as open surgery or pure laparoscopy without robot assistance.
* Patients with bilateral kidneys or a solitary kidney, so long as these are native kidneys as opposed to a transplanted kidney.
* Patients can have the common single renal artery and single renal vein, or they can have common variants such as two renal arteries and/or two renal veins.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients on hemodialysis.
* Patients who have had a renal transplantation.
* Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation prior to surgery (example anticoagulants include: aspirin 325 mg daily, clopidogrel, warfarin, fondaparinux, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban). However, patients who take aspirin 81 mg daily as their daily regimen will be included.
* Patients with bleeding disorders (example: hemophilia) and other documented coagulopathy (example: chronic liver disease) with international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.0 at baseline.
* Patients who have had a prior surgical procedure, aside from percutaneous renal biopsy, on the kidney in the current operation.
* Patients with over 100 mL of estimated blood loss (calculated by anesthesia team using the suction canisters) prior to clamping of the renal hilum will be excluded.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

89 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Northwestern University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Robert B. Nadler

Vice Chair, Department of Urology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert Nadler, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Professor of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Northwestern Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STU00206993

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Navigated Partial Nephrectomy
NCT07315100 COMPLETED NA
Robotic Radical Perineal Prostatectomy Study
NCT04919057 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA