Evaluation of Hemostatic Agents in Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
NCT ID: NCT03528057
Last Updated: 2019-07-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-04-18
2020-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Random Evaluation of Patients Who Have Had Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
NCT04120805
Off Clamp Randomization
NCT01732120
Hemopatch to Prevent Lymphatic Leak After Robotic Prostatectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection
NCT04185922
a Prospective Trial Comparing Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy
NCT03900364
A Novel Haemostatic Agent for Robotic Partial Nephrectomy
NCT07284953
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Hemostatic agents (HA) are devices commonly used during robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) due to the risk of bleeding posed by incising a highly vascular organ. The use of various HAs as part of the surgical technique for RALPN is well-described. Potential benefits such as lower blood loss, lower rate of urine leak, and lower blood product transfusion rates have been suggested in small case series. However, larger prospective studies have failed to demonstrate these benefits of HAs. They report similar patient outcomes regardless of HA use. However, these studies are subject to selection bias given the lack of randomization, and they had a small relative number of partial nephrectomies performed without HAs.
To the knowledge of the investigators, no randomized trials have addressed the use of HAs in RALPN. Randomized, controlled trials for partial hepatectomy and knee arthroplasty have shown no benefit when using hemostatic agents to control bleeding.
At the home institution for this study, surgeons routinely use HAs in the resection bed during RALPN. Available, FDA approved, commercial agents include Floseal and Nu-KnitĀ®. Each unit of HA costs $150 - $419 per unit, and often multiple units are used during a given procedure. The hospital is paid a set amount based on the patient's insurance for performing the procedure regardless of use of HA. The use of HAs therefore increases costs incurred by the hospital when performing these procedures. It is imperative to determine if this expenditure is justified.
The primary aim of this study is to compare surgical outcomes in patients undergoing RALPN with and without the use of hemostatic agents. Given the small nature of and conflicting information from the aforementioned cohort studies, it is imperative to remove selection bias and perform a randomized comparison of HA use. This study will provide a much more definitive head-to-head comparison of the overall utility of HAs. Additionally, it may provide more information about differential patient selection for more appropriate and judicious use of HAs. No study has evaluated differential patient selection for HA use, and therefore any finding in this realm would be novel.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Patients undergoing RALPN with the use of HAs by a surgeon.
Hemostat
Hemostatic agents, if used at all during surgery, will be applied laparoscopically into the tumor bed to stop bleeding. The type of hemostat will be decided by the surgeon according to the anatomy of the tumor bed.
Group 2
Patients undergoing RALPN without the use of HAs by a surgeon
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hemostat
Hemostatic agents, if used at all during surgery, will be applied laparoscopically into the tumor bed to stop bleeding. The type of hemostat will be decided by the surgeon according to the anatomy of the tumor bed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must have a solid or cystic renal mass suspicious for malignancy by imaging with ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
* Patients must be initially scheduled RALPN as opposed to radical nephrectomy or other techniques for partial nephrectomy such as open surgery or pure laparoscopy without robot assistance.
* Patients with bilateral kidneys or a solitary kidney, so long as these are native kidneys as opposed to a transplanted kidney.
* Patients can have the common single renal artery and single renal vein, or they can have common variants such as two renal arteries and/or two renal veins.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who have had a renal transplantation.
* Patients on therapeutic anticoagulation prior to surgery (example anticoagulants include: aspirin 325 mg daily, clopidogrel, warfarin, fondaparinux, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban). However, patients who take aspirin 81 mg daily as their daily regimen will be included.
* Patients with bleeding disorders (example: hemophilia) and other documented coagulopathy (example: chronic liver disease) with international normalized ratio (INR) \> 1.0 at baseline.
* Patients who have had a prior surgical procedure, aside from percutaneous renal biopsy, on the kidney in the current operation.
* Patients with over 100 mL of estimated blood loss (calculated by anesthesia team using the suction canisters) prior to clamping of the renal hilum will be excluded.
18 Years
89 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Robert B. Nadler
Vice Chair, Department of Urology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Nadler, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Professor of Urology, Feinberg School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00206993
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.