Quick Yielding Modified Short-Distance Fenestration Technique for the Treatment of Complex Aortic Arch Diseases: a Multicenter Single-Arm Objective Performance Criteria Trial(QYM-Tech Study)
NCT ID: NCT06639243
Last Updated: 2024-10-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
87 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-01
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: This is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, interventional study involving 87 patients across 3 centers. Eligible participants are adults aged 18-80 diagnosed with thoracic aortic dissection, thoracic aortic aneurysm (true or pseudo), penetrating aortic ulcer, or intramural hematoma, necessitating supra-aortic branch vessel reconstruction. The surgical protocol involves TEVAR combined with the QYM technique for fenestration and revascularization.
Primary Outcome: The primary endpoint is the incidence of major adverse events (MAE) within 30 days post-operation.
Secondary Outcomes: Secondary endpoints include 12-month aortic treatment success, all-cause mortality, aortic-related mortality, incidence of severe adverse events, occurrence of Type I/III endoleaks, stent graft migration, patency of revascularized branches, and rates of conversion to open surgery or reintervention due to aortic complications.
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria: Key inclusion criteria include imaging-confirmed thoracic aortic disease requiring endovascular repair with a proximal landing zone in the aortic arch (Zone 0) and suitable anatomical features for stent placement. Patients with recent systemic infections, severe coronary artery involvement, or other significant comorbidities were excluded.
Follow-up and Statistical Analysis: Patients will undergo follow-ups at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery. Statistical analyses will include descriptive statistics of quantitative and categorical variables, with statistical significance set at a one-sided p-value \< 0.025.
This study aims to provide critical insights into the clinical applicability of the QYM technique, potentially broadening therapeutic options for complex aortic arch diseases.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Endovascular Aortic Repair for Aortic Dissection
NCT01505309
The CardiOvascular Remodeling Following Endovascular Aortic Repair (CORE) Study
NCT02735720
TEAVR With False Lumen Embolization for Aortic Dissection
NCT07198295
Antibiotic Prophylaxis for TEVAR
NCT05405790
Safety and Efficacy of TEVAR Combined With Long Bare-metal Stents in the Intervention of ATBAD
NCT06892730
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
QTM Technique Treatment Arm
In this study, all participants will undergo the Quick Yielding Modified (QYM) technique, which combines thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) with in situ fenestration and revascularization of the supra-aortic branches. This technique is designed to treat patients with complex aortic arch diseases, including thoracic aortic dissection, true and pseudoaneurysms, penetrating aortic ulcers, and intramural hematomas. The procedure aims to provide a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery, allowing for the effective reconstruction of the aortic arch and its branches. The study will assess the safety and efficacy of this technique, with key outcomes including the incidence of major adverse events (MAE) and the long-term success of the treatment.
QYM Technique
The intervention in this study involves the application of the Quick Yielding Modified (QYM) technique for the treatment of complex aortic arch diseases. This procedure consists of two main components:
1. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR): This minimally invasive procedure utilizes a covered stent graft to exclude the diseased segment of the thoracic aorta, providing immediate protection against rupture and controlling blood flow.
2. In Situ Fenestration and Revascularization of Supra-Aortic Branches: Following TEVAR, the QYM technique includes creating fenestrations in the stent graft to allow for the revascularization of the supra-aortic branches (such as the brachiocephalic, left common carotid, and left subclavian arteries). This is achieved through direct puncture and reconstruction of the branch vessels, ensuring adequate blood flow to these critical arteries while preserving their function.
The combination of these techniques aims to achieve effective treatment out
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
QYM Technique
The intervention in this study involves the application of the Quick Yielding Modified (QYM) technique for the treatment of complex aortic arch diseases. This procedure consists of two main components:
1. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR): This minimally invasive procedure utilizes a covered stent graft to exclude the diseased segment of the thoracic aorta, providing immediate protection against rupture and controlling blood flow.
2. In Situ Fenestration and Revascularization of Supra-Aortic Branches: Following TEVAR, the QYM technique includes creating fenestrations in the stent graft to allow for the revascularization of the supra-aortic branches (such as the brachiocephalic, left common carotid, and left subclavian arteries). This is achieved through direct puncture and reconstruction of the branch vessels, ensuring adequate blood flow to these critical arteries while preserving their function.
The combination of these techniques aims to achieve effective treatment out
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosis: Patients with the following thoracic aortic conditions confirmed by imaging (CTA):
* Thoracic aortic dissection
* True thoracic aortic aneurysm
* Thoracic pseudoaneurysm
* Penetrating aortic ulcer
* Intramural hematoma
3. Indication for Treatment: Patients requiring supra-aortic branch vessel reconstruction due to rupture, impending rupture, malperfusion syndrome, rapid expansion, uncontrolled pain, aneurysmal dilation, or for prophylactic reasons.
4. Proximal Landing Zone: Patients whose proximal stent landing zone is in Zone 0 of the aortic arch.
5. Aortic Anatomy:
* Length of ascending aorta \>4 cm (from the sinotubular junction to the proximal edge of the brachiocephalic artery).
* Diameter of ascending aorta between 24 mm and 44 mm.
6. Access Vessel Anatomy:
* Iliac artery diameter ≥7 mm.
* Brachiocephalic artery diameter ≤24 mm, and length ≥20 mm.
7. Informed Consent: Patients who have been informed about the nature of the study and agreed to participate by signing the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Recent Neck Surgery: Patients who underwent neck surgery within the past 3 months.
3. Coronary Involvement: Patients with disease extending to the coronary arteries or aortic valve.
4. Infectious or Autoimmune Diseases: Patients with conditions such as infectious aortic disease, large vessel vasculitis, or Marfan syndrome (or other connective tissue disorders).
5. Severe Vascular Conditions: Patients with severe stenosis, calcification, thrombosis, or tortuosity of the carotid or subclavian arteries.
6. Heart Transplant: Patients who have undergone heart transplantation.
7. Recent Cardiac Events: Patients who had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the last 3 months.
8. Advanced Heart Failure: Patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV heart failure.
9. Active Gastrointestinal Conditions: Patients with active peptic ulcer disease or upper gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 3 months.
10. Hematologic Abnormalities:
* Leukopenia (white blood cell count \< 3×10⁹/L)
* Acute anemia (hemoglobin \< 90 g/L)
* Thrombocytopenia (platelet count \< 50×10⁹/L)
* History of bleeding disorders or coagulopathy.
11. Renal Function: Patients with impaired renal function (creatinine \> 265 µmol/L) or those with end-stage renal disease.
12. Pregnancy or Lactation: Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
13. Allergy to Contrast Media: Patients with an allergy to the contrast agents used in imaging.
14. Life Expectancy: Patients with an expected survival of less than 12 months.
15. Concurrent Research Participation: Patients involved in other drug or device trials.
16. Other Medical Conditions: Any other disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the endovascular treatment or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Qingwei Ding
Medical Doctor, Sub-PI
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Vascular Surgery, General Surgery Clinical Center, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Shu C, Fan B, Luo M, Li Q, Fang K, Li M, Li X, He H, Wang T, Yang C, Xue Y, Gao H, Zhao J. Endovascular treatment for aortic arch pathologies: chimney, on-the-table fenestration, and in-situ fenestration techniques. J Thorac Dis. 2020 Apr;12(4):1437-1448. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.10.
Matsuda H, Fukuda T, Iritani O, Nakazawa T, Tanaka H, Sasaki H, Minatoya K, Ogino H. Spinal cord injury is not negligible after TEVAR for lower descending aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010 Feb;39(2):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.11.014. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
Wang J, Jin T, Chen B, Pan Y, Shao C. Systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence in endograft therapy vs medical treatment for uncomplicated type B aortic dissection. J Vasc Surg. 2022 Oct;76(4):1099-1108.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.876. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Qingwei Ding
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.