Surgical Versus Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Function (STICH 3.0-NL)

NCT ID: NCT07269366

Last Updated: 2025-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

358 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-28

Study Completion Date

2034-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized multicenter trial compares coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in 358 patients with ischemic left ventricular dysfunction and multivessel coronary disease. The study evaluates differences in survival, major cardiovascular events, and quality of life over 4 years, and contributes to the international STICH 3.0 collaboration assessing long-term outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction (iLVSD) and multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) have a poor prognosis. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has been shown to improve long-term survival in this population compared to medical therapy alone. However, CABG carries higher short-term risks, leading to underutilization in older and comorbid patients. In contrast, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is frequently performed due to perceived lower procedural risk, despite limited evidence supporting its benefit in patients with LV dysfunction. Previous studies comparing PCI with medical therapy excluded patients with clear indications for revascularization, such as those with significant angina or recent acute coronary syndrome, leaving uncertainty about the optimal treatment strategy.

The STICH 3.0-NL trial is a prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study designed to compare CABG and PCI in patients with iLVSD (LVEF \<40%) and multivessel CAD who are candidates for coronary revascularization. A total of 358 patients will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to undergo CABG or PCI, aiming for full revascularization.

The primary endpoint is a hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality, recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: non-procedural myocardial infarction, stroke, or unplanned revascularization), and recurrent hospitalizations for heart failure at 4 years. Secondary endpoints include the individual components of the primary endpoint, cardiovascular mortality, periprocedural myocardial infarction, target vessel and lesion revascularization, changes in quality of life (Seattle Angina Questionnaire and KCCQ), and cost-effectiveness expressed as QALY and ICER.

The STICH 3.0-NL trial will contribute approximately 10% of the total cohort to the international STICH 3.0 collaboration, enabling long-term analyses of all-cause mortality at 5 and 10 years and providing critical evidence to guide revascularization strategies in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease CABG CABG in Low EF Heart Failure PCI Revascularization

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CABG (surgery)

Patients randomized to CABG will receive CABG - aiming for full revascularization

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CABG

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting)

PCI (percutaneous)

Patients randomized to PCI will receive PCI - aiming for full revascularization

Group Type OTHER

PCI

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CABG

CABG (coronary artery bypass grafting)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

PCI

PCI (percutaneous coronary intervention)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* LVEF≤ 40%
* Angina pectoris, CCS≥2 and/or hospitalization for ACS or heart failure within 1 year prior to randomization
* Multivessel CAD (2-3 vessel-disease with coronary lesions \>70% and involvement of proximal LAD, and/or LM stenosis of \>50%). Target vessels are determined by the local Heart Time
* Clinical and angiographical characteristics suitable for isolated coronary revascularization both by CABG or PCI according to the judgment of the local Heart Team
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* ACS \< 48 hours before randomization
* Valvular/structural heart disease requiring intervention
* Contra-indications to DAPT
* Non-cardiac condition with life expectancy \< 1 year
* Previous CABG
* Decompensated HF at the time of inclusion
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Dutch Heart Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medical Center Groningen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Erik Lipsic, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Medical Center Groningen

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Erik Lipsic, Dr

Role: CONTACT

+31 50 3612355

Ruben R. De With, Dr

Role: CONTACT

+31 50 3612355

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

01-001-2024-0545

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NL-009839

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.