Long-term Survival Outcomes According to the Pathologic Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in PDAC and the Fate of the Patients with Good CAP Grade
NCT ID: NCT06630481
Last Updated: 2024-10-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
462 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-01-01
2024-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
2. Among various pathological tumor regression grading systems, the College of American Pathologists (CAP) system is commonly used to predict chemo-responsiveness and survival.
3. This study aimed to analyze long-term survival outcomes based on pathologic response using the CAP grade after NAT in PDAC and to identify clinicopathologic factors that influence a favorable pathologic response.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
An Exploration of Candidates for Neoadjuvant Treatment in Resectable Pancreatic Cancer
NCT06129812
Neoadjuvant FDR GX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
NCT01268384
A Phase 2 Trial of Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFIRINOX Chemotherapy for Resectable Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
NCT05066802
Risk Factors of Postoperative Complications and Survival Rate in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Patients
NCT06378853
Clinical Outcomes of Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
NCT05888129
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CAP grade 0
No viable cancer cells in pancreatic resection specimen with neoadjuvant therapy.
neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, or both.
CAP grade 1
Single cells or rare small groups of cancer cells in pancreatic resection specimen with neoadjuvant therapy.
neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, or both.
CAP grade 2
Residual cancer with evident tumor regression in pancreatic resection specimen with neoadjuvant therapy.
neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, or both.
CAP grade 3
Extensive residual cancer with no evident tumor regression in pancreatic resection specimen with neoadjuvant therapy.
neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, or both.
pathological complete response
No viable cancer cells in pancreatic resection specimen with neoadjuvant therapy.
neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, or both.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
neoadjuvant therapy
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, or both.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients were initiated on NAT after confirming PDAC diagnosis based on pathological examination.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who underwent palliative surgery
* Patients who received NAT outside the specified protocol due to incomplete information.
19 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jin-Young Jang
Professor
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2407-036-1558
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.