The Study for Evaluate of Satety and Dfficacy of Hemostatic Device
NCT ID: NCT06590571
Last Updated: 2024-09-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
227 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-12-14
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Researchers will compare conventional compression to see if new pneumatic device can provide better hemostasis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of External Leg Compression Devices on Healing and Blood Clotting
NCT03050671
Comparison of Different Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices for Deep Vein Thrombosis
NCT01779648
Feasibility Study of Geko vs. IPCs in Trauma
NCT01835990
Non-elastic Compression Garment Therapy Versus Control for Deep Vein Thrombosis
NCT03368313
Pneumatic Compression for Preventing Venous Thromboembolism
NCT02040103
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary endpoint was the achievement of successful hemostasis at 3 hours. Successful hemostasis was defined as the absence of oozing and the absence of hematoma formation after the device was released. If incomplete hemostasis was observed after 3 hours, the achievement of hemostasis after an additional hour of compression was also considered successful. Conversely, if hemostasis could not be established, it was defined as unsuccessful hemostasis. The secondary endpoints included the total banding time, local vascular complications classified according to the EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries) scale, pain or discomfort related to the transradial approach, which was assessed by the participants using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale and numeric pain rating scale, and the RAO at one month.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TRAcelet™ compression group
the group using TRAcelet™ received 2 hours and 15 minutes of compression from the device with 13 cc of air being blown in, followed by 3 stepwise releases every 15 minutes through counterclockwise rotation of the dial without extracting air using a syringe. This achieved the same 3 hours of compression. The dial started at the triangle position and was set to nine, six, and three at every stepwise decompression. After three hours, the device was released.
TRAcelet™
The group using TRAcelet™ after transradial angiography/intervention receives 2 hours and 15 minutes of compression from the device, followed by 3 stepwise releases every 15 minutes. There are two sizes of TRAcelet™ available, large and medium. Assuming that a Korean adult's wrist size is smaller than that of the Western population, we used a medium-sized TRAcelet™.
Conventional compression group
Patients who were assigned to the conventional group received radial artery compression by a gauze pad folded into a cuboid shape, fastened with 3M™ Durapore™ surgical tape. The gauze pad was not impregnated with prothrombotic material. Compression was released at 3 hours to check for complications. An additional one hour of compression was applied when incomplete hemostasis or hematoma was identified.
Gauze pad
Patients received radial artery compression by a gauze pad fastened with 3M™ Durapore™ surgical tape. An additional one hour of compression was applied when incomplete hemostasis or hematoma was identified.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
TRAcelet™
The group using TRAcelet™ after transradial angiography/intervention receives 2 hours and 15 minutes of compression from the device, followed by 3 stepwise releases every 15 minutes. There are two sizes of TRAcelet™ available, large and medium. Assuming that a Korean adult's wrist size is smaller than that of the Western population, we used a medium-sized TRAcelet™.
Gauze pad
Patients received radial artery compression by a gauze pad fastened with 3M™ Durapore™ surgical tape. An additional one hour of compression was applied when incomplete hemostasis or hematoma was identified.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Underwent coronary angiography under suspicion of coronary artery disease
* Agreed to participate in the trial before the coronary angiography procedure
Exclusion Criteria
* Those who were on anticoagulants.
* Patients who could not provide voluntary consent.
20 Years
99 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Min Ku Chon
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Yangsan, Gyeongsannam-do, South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TRAcelet study
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.