Feasibility Study of Geko vs. IPCs in Trauma

NCT ID: NCT01835990

Last Updated: 2015-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-07-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Trauma patients are at a high risk of developing blood clots in the legs (deep vein thrombosis - DVT), which can travel to the lungs and cause serious health consequences. Often, these patients cannot receive blood-thinning medication to prevent these blood clots because of the risk of bleeding; in this case, they are usually given intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCs) to prevent blood clots. IPCs are inflatable sleeves that fit over the legs and periodically inflate and deflate, helping to pump blood out of the legs and thus reduce the risk of blood clot formation. Several studies suggest that IPCs are working properly on the patient only 60-70% of the time. Some patients also find them uncomfortable. A new device (geko) that works by stimulating the leg muscles and increasing blood flow in the legs has recently been developed. To compare the geko with IPCs, this study will randomly assign trauma patients who cannot receive blood thinners for blood clot prevention to either IPCs or geko. The main goal is to determine the feasibility of doing a larger study which would compare the efficacy of these devices in preventing blood clots. The amount of time the devices are properly used on the patients, comfort and tolerability, development of blood clots, and blood flow in the leg veins and arteries will also be measured and compared between the devices.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Trauma Venous Thromboembolism

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

geko

For subjects randomized to the experimental treatment arm, one gekoTM device will be applied to each leg according to the manufacturer's instructions by the subject's primary care nurse. All nurses applying the devices must be trained on proper application technique. The old devices will be removed and new devices applied daily. The subject will continue to use the devices until he or she exits the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

geko

Intervention Type DEVICE

The geko is a neuromuscular stimulation device that stimulates the common peroneal nerve resulting in contraction of the leg muscles and increased venous and arterial flow. It is Health Canada approved for prevention of deep venous thrombosis.

IPCs

The control treatment will consist of the hospital's standard IPC devices. The IPCs will be applied to each leg by the subject's primary care nurse according to the manufacturer's instructions. They will continue to be applied until exit from the study. At the time of withdrawal from the study, the decision regarding continued use of IPCs will be made by the treating physician.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

IPCs

Intervention Type DEVICE

devices that pneumatically compress the leg, resulting in increased venous blood flow.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

geko

The geko is a neuromuscular stimulation device that stimulates the common peroneal nerve resulting in contraction of the leg muscles and increased venous and arterial flow. It is Health Canada approved for prevention of deep venous thrombosis.

Intervention Type DEVICE

IPCs

devices that pneumatically compress the leg, resulting in increased venous blood flow.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

neuromuscular stimulation device intermittent pneumatic compression devices Arjo Huntleigh Flowtron

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of trauma, meeting criteria for referral to the HHS trauma service - ANY of the following (1-3):

1. patient with obvious major injuries in two or more systems, each requiring a specialist and inpatient care
2. spinal injury with paraplegia or tetraplegia; severe penetrating injury to the head, neck, trunk or groin; amputation above the wrist or ankle; burns, second or third degree, involving 20% or more body surface area, or involving the face or genitalia
3. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than or equal to 10, as a result of trauma or any two of:

* significant decrease in level of consciousness
* pulse \< 50 or \> 120
* BP \< 80 or absent radial pulse
* Respiratory rate \< 10 or \> 24
* Subject admitted to the Hamilton General Hospital ICU or the hospital ward step-down units
* Age 18 years or older
* Contraindication to anticoagulation expected to last for more than 3 days. Contraindication to anticoagulation may include intracranial hemorrhage, ocular injury with associated hemorrhage, solid intra-abdominal organ injury (i.e. liver, spleen, kidney), and/or pelvic or retroperitoneal hematoma requiring transfusion. \[12\] The final determination of whether anticoagulant prophylaxis is contraindicated will be made by the treating physician.
* Projected hospitalization greater than 3 days (as determined by treating physician)
* Informed consent can be provided by the subject or substitute decision maker within 48 hours of admission

Exclusion Criteria

* Inability to wear either IPCs or gekoTM on both legs, including but not limited to:

* unstable fracture of the lower extremity;
* compartment syndrome of the lower extremity;
* skin breakdown affecting the area on which the devices will be applied;
* prior amputation affecting the area on which the devices will be applied;
* severe peripheral ischemic vascular disease;
* uncontrolled bleeding of the lower extremity;
* Diagnosis of DVT within 1 month prior to assessment for enrollment
* Use of anticoagulant medication within 24h of enrollment (except when used solely as a flush for intravenous catheters), or ongoing effect of anticoagulant medication at time of enrollment as determined by history of medication use and laboratory evidence of medication effect. For the purposes of this study, anticoagulant medications include:

* unfractionated heparin (intravenous or subcutaneous)
* low molecular weight heparin
* fondaparinux
* dabigatran
* rivaroxaban
* warfarin
* argatroban
* danaparoid
* lepirudin
* Leg circumference greater than 24 inches at the location the gekoTM device would be secured to the leg.
* Presence of cardiac demand pacemaker
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vinai C Bhagirath, MD FRCP(C)

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

McMaster University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GIFT Pilot

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.