New Compression Hosiery Versus Standard Class II Compression Stockings After Endothermal Ablation
NCT ID: NCT03477227
Last Updated: 2020-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
187 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-29
2018-12-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Elastic Compression Stockings and Varicose Veins Recurrence
NCT04231942
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression in Surgical Patients at Extremely-high Risk for Venous Thromboembolism
NCT03044574
First- or Second- Class Compression Hosiery After Endovenous Laser With Sclerotherapy and Ambulatory Phlebectomy
NCT06913764
Daily Duration of Compression Treatment in Patients With Symptomatic Chronic Venous Disease
NCT06175546
Endovenous Laser Ablation in Acute Thrombophlebitis of the Varicose Great Saphenous Vein
NCT05001776
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aim of the study The purpose of this study is to compare a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.
Materials and methods A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Non-inferiority Trial. The study compares the effectiveness of a short compression hosiery (stocking without a foot, compression class 2) with standard compression class 2 stockings for 7 days after the endovascular radiofrequency ablation of great saphenous vein with phlebectomy varicose tributaries.
The study includes patients who are scheduled for the radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein and phlebectomy varicose tributaries (CEAP classification classes C2-C4).
Endpoints in the study: the main outcome (primary endpoint) is the quality of life according to CIVIQ questionnaire on the 30th day after the intervention. Additional outcomes (secondary endpoints): comfort of using short compression stocking with the visual analog scale (VAS), pain level with the visual analogue scale (VAS), foot swelling. Registration of results for additional outcomes is conducted on days 1, 7, 14 and 30.
The calculation of the sample size was made using the online calculator "Compare 2 Means: 2 Sample Non Inferiority or Superiority" (https://goo.gl/8ND8CQ). The sample size was calculated taking into account the average values for the CIVIQ quality of life questionnaire on day 30 after the endovascular treatment obtained by reviewing the literature. Selected parameters: first-order error (α) 2.5%; power 80%; boundaries of "non-inferiority limit" 5; the expected difference between the study groups of 0. Taking into account the possible dropout of patients from the study, the size of the groups is increased by 10%. The estimated sample size is 164 participants. Randomization of patients into groups is carried out with the help of the system of randomization of the site "Register of methods for treatment of chronic disease."
Statistical analysis. It is planned to conduct ITT - analysis (intentio-to-treat). For comparison, the primary and secondary outcomes will use nonparametric statistics (Mann-Whitney U-test).
Discussion The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a new type of compression hosiery of a Russian manufacturer. The main hypotheses of the study: 1) it is expected that the absence of a "foot" in hosiery will increase the comfort of its use and increase the compliance of patients to the prescribed compression regime after intervention; 2) it is assumed that the lack of compression in the foot area will not lead to the development of its swelling and a decrease in the comfort of wearing compression hosiery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Short stocking
After radiofrequency ablation of the GSF and phlebectomy varicose tributaries, patients will wear compression socks without foot for four weeks
Short stocking
Patients in the experimental group will be asked to wear new type of compression stockings for four weeks post-operatively
Usual stocking
After radiofrequency ablation of the GSF and phlebectomy varicose tributaries, patients will wear usual compression socks for four weeks (usual care)
Usual stocking
Patients in the control group will be asked to wear usual type of compression 2 class stockings for four weeks post-operatively
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Short stocking
Patients in the experimental group will be asked to wear new type of compression stockings for four weeks post-operatively
Usual stocking
Patients in the control group will be asked to wear usual type of compression 2 class stockings for four weeks post-operatively
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Symptomatic great saphenous vein (GSV) vein reflux \> 0.5 seconds on color Duplex
* CEAP C2-C4 (inclusive)
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* CEAP Class C5 or C6 disease
* Prior GSV treatment
* History of deep vein thrombosis
* Acute deep or superficial vein thrombosis
* Pregnancy
* Patients who are unable to attend the hospital for follow-up
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medalp Private Surgery Clinic
OTHER
Research Clinical Centre of the Russian Railways, JSC
OTHER
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Igor Zolotukhin
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Igor Zolotukhin
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Federal Budget-Funded Institution National Medical Surgical Center named after N. I. Pirogov
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Federal Budget-Funded Institution National Medical Surgical Center named after N. I. Pirogov of the Ministry of health of the Russian Federation
Moscow, , Russia
Road Clinical Hospital of JSC "Russian Railways"
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Medalp Private Surgery Clinic
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zolotukhin I, Demekhova M, Ilyukhin E, Sonkin I, Zakharova E, Efremova O, Kiseleva E, Gavrilov E. A randomized trial of class II compression sleeves for full legs versus stockings after thermal ablation with phlebectomy. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2021 Sep;9(5):1235-1240. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.067. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COSMOS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.