Study Results
Results available
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
COMPLETED
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
204 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2015-05-31
Study Completion Date
2019-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study will be looking at the effect of compression therapy in patients having endovenous treatment for truncal incompetence of their varicose veins using either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or endovenous laser therapy (EVLT). Patients will be randomised to either the compression group (group A) or the no compression group (group B).
The pain scores, compliance, quality of life scores, occlusion rate at 6 months as well as the cost effectiveness of each intervention will be assessed.
The pain scores, compliance, quality of life scores, occlusion rate at 6 months as well as the cost effectiveness of each intervention will be assessed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Compression Therapy Following Truncal Vein Endothermal Ablation And Distal Sclerotherapy
NCT02890563
Varicose Veins
COMPLETED
NA
Effect of Short-term Compression Therapy After Thermal Ablation for Varicose Veins
NCT05840991
Varicose Veins
UNKNOWN
NA
COmpressioN Following Endovenous TreatmenT of Incompetent Varicose Veins
NCT02655406
Varicose Veins
COMPLETED
NA
Elastic Compression in Chronic Venous Disease
NCT02641600
Varicosity
UNKNOWN
NA
A Trial to Compare the Outcome of Localised Varicosity Compression for 24 Hours and 5 Days After Foam Sclerotherapy to Truncal Varices
NCT00991497
Varicose Veins
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background
Varicose veins are common and are known to affect approximately one third of the population. Chronic venous disease (CVD) has been shown to have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and treatment of varicose veins has been demonstrated to lead to improvement in the quality of life of patients. Over the past decade, new endovenous techniques have been introduced and these are felt to be cost-effective, especially, when performed in an outpatient or 'office-based' setting.
There is currently uncertainty about the use of compression stockings following treatment of varicose veins. In their consensus statement in 2008, the International Union of Phlebology (IUP) stated that there is good evidence for using compression in certain clinical indications. These include the management of telangiectasia after sclerotherapy, varicose veins in pregnancy, prevention of thromboembolism and healing of ulcers. However, a few questions remain unanswered, such as the length of treatment and level of compression to be used6. The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum recommend using compression stockings post-operatively for 1 week to prevent haematoma formation, pain and swelling. The 2013 NICE Guidelines on Varicose Veins in the Legs recommended the use of compression hosiery for no more than 7 days after interventional treatment for varicose veins. However, due to current uncertainty of compression bandaging or hosiery compared to no compression after interventional treatment for varicose veins, the NICE Guideline Development Group have advocated further research to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of this post-procedure intervention. The guidelines also suggested looking into the length of time compression bandaging should be worn if it shown to be beneficial.
Several researchers have looked into the practice of using compression after venous ablation. In a survey of the management of varicose veins by the members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Edwards et al. found that the majority of surgeons used bandages post-operatively, with 49% using elastic bandages. The literature on the use of compression stockings following treatment of varicose vein is limited.
Between December 2006 and February 2008, Bakker and colleagues conducted a prospective randomised controlled trial on the use of compression stockings after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein. One hundred and nine patients were approached with 93 finally randomised to use compression stockings for 2 days (Group A) and 7 days (Group B), respectively. All patients were followed up for 3 months post-treatment and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was recorded at 48 hours, 1 week and 6 weeks. A physical examination and quality of life was assessed at 1 week and 6 weeks. Occlusion rate at the 3 month point was also evaluated. Physical function and vitality was shown to be significantly better in group B at 1 week follow-up, but there was no statistically significant difference at 6 weeks. At 1 week, it was also noted that the VAS score in group B (VAS score 2.0 ± 1.1) was significantly lower than in patients wearing compression stockings for 48 hours (VAS score 3.7 ± 2.1) (p≤0.001)10. No significant difference was, however, observed at 6 weeks post-procedure. Limitations of the study include the high drop out of the trial (40 out of the initial 109 approached) and the absence of any phlebectomies or sclerotherapy in the patients.
Elderman et al. carried out a randomised trial to assess the effect of compression stockings after endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) for great saphenous vein incompetence. Patients' reported pain scores and quality of life scores was evaluated on the day of the procedure, 2-3 days afterwards and 2-6 weeks post-procedure. A total of 111 patients were randomised to stockings (n=55) and no stockings (n=56). There was a statistically significant difference in the pain scores in favour of the stockings group up to day 7, but this difference was no longer present by week 6. There was also a greater use of analgesia in patients in the no stockings group compared to patients wearing stockings (p\<0.05). In addition, patients wearing stockings reported a statistically significantly higher score of satisfaction at 2 days (4.44 vs 4.15) and at 6 weeks (4.59 vs 4.18). The absolute difference was, however, small. Two notable limitations of the study were the high level of drop outs (16 from each group) and the absence of any blinding.
Hamel-Desnos et al. undertook a randomised controlled trial looking at the effect of compression in patients receiving foam sclerotherapy of the saphenous vein. They noted that patients with compression had similar pain and quality of life scores to patients not wearing any compression. They concluded that additional use of compression had no impact on the effectiveness of obliteration of veins, satisfaction scores, symptoms and quality of life, and that further controlled trials was needed to answer the question of whether using compression results in any difference to the outcome of varicose vein procedures.
The investigators, therefore, propose to undertake a multicentre randomised study looking at the effect of compression therapy after endovenous thermal ablation.
Description
This will be a multicentre randomised clinical trial looking at the impact of wearing or not wearing compression stocking following endothermal ablation (either endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) of incompetent truncal veins. Those requiring concurrent phlebectomies or foam injection will be excluded.
Patients will be randomised into group A (compression) and group B (no compression). Only the use of compression will be randomised while the decision as to which treatment to use will be at the discretion of the clinical team.
Target Population
Patients referred for treatment of symptomatic varicose veins will be recruited if they are found to have primary great saphenous (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence on colour duplex scan.
Intervention
Patients will be randomised to have compression (group A) or no compression (group B). The compression therapy used will be Class II compression stockings. The treatment offered will be endothermal ablation (either endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) of incompetent truncal veins. Concurrent phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy will not be carried out.
Patients randomised to group A will be asked to wear compression stockings for 1 week.
Patients randomised to group B will not be provided with any compression.
At baseline, patients will be asked to fill quality of life questionnaires (EQ-5D, AVVQ and CIVIQ) and will have their clinical scores assessed (CEAP and VCSS). On discharge after their varicose vein intervention, they will then be provided with a diary to record their post-procedural pain every day for 10 days using a validated visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as to record when they return to their normal activities and are back to work. They will also be asked to attend a follow-up in 2 weeks and at 6 months.
Patients' GP will also be sent a letter to inform them of their patient's participation in the study.
Follow-up
Patients will be followed up in the outpatient clinic at 2 weeks and 6 months.
Follow-up at 2 Weeks At the 2 weeks' follow-up, the diary containing details of the pain scores and how soon patients were able to return to normal activities/work will be collected. In addition, patients will be asked about any bruising or phlebitis they have had in the two weeks after their procedure and how compliant they have been with the compression. They will be examined and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) will be recorded. They will also be asked to fill in the EQ-5D, AVVQ and CIVIQ scores.
Follow-up at 6 Months At the 6 months follow-up, patients will be examined and their VCSS will be recorded. They will also be asked to fill the EQ-5D, AVVQ and the CIVIQ scores. They will have a venous Duplex scan to determine occlusion of the treated vein.
Sample Size and Study Duration
The study team estimated the sample size needed to observe a difference of at least 10mm in the VAS score, with a standard deviation of 20mm. With power at 80% and 5% significance equivalence, the study would need to recruit 128 patients (64 per group) to show a difference.
Previous studies looking at compression stockings have shown drop out rates close to 37% at 3 months10. Therefore, if an estimated drop out rate of about 40% by 6 months is used, at least 214 patients would need to be recruited. If at least 2 patients per week are recruited, this will be approximately a total of 208 patients that could potentially be randomised over the course of two years.
With 6 months follow-up, therefore, the study will be running for 24 months with a target recruitment of 214 patients.
Settings The study will be conducted at the Imperial College NHS Trust
Varicose veins are common and are known to affect approximately one third of the population. Chronic venous disease (CVD) has been shown to have a negative impact on the quality of life of patients and treatment of varicose veins has been demonstrated to lead to improvement in the quality of life of patients. Over the past decade, new endovenous techniques have been introduced and these are felt to be cost-effective, especially, when performed in an outpatient or 'office-based' setting.
There is currently uncertainty about the use of compression stockings following treatment of varicose veins. In their consensus statement in 2008, the International Union of Phlebology (IUP) stated that there is good evidence for using compression in certain clinical indications. These include the management of telangiectasia after sclerotherapy, varicose veins in pregnancy, prevention of thromboembolism and healing of ulcers. However, a few questions remain unanswered, such as the length of treatment and level of compression to be used6. The Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum recommend using compression stockings post-operatively for 1 week to prevent haematoma formation, pain and swelling. The 2013 NICE Guidelines on Varicose Veins in the Legs recommended the use of compression hosiery for no more than 7 days after interventional treatment for varicose veins. However, due to current uncertainty of compression bandaging or hosiery compared to no compression after interventional treatment for varicose veins, the NICE Guideline Development Group have advocated further research to evaluate the clinical and cost effectiveness of this post-procedure intervention. The guidelines also suggested looking into the length of time compression bandaging should be worn if it shown to be beneficial.
Several researchers have looked into the practice of using compression after venous ablation. In a survey of the management of varicose veins by the members of the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland, Edwards et al. found that the majority of surgeons used bandages post-operatively, with 49% using elastic bandages. The literature on the use of compression stockings following treatment of varicose vein is limited.
Between December 2006 and February 2008, Bakker and colleagues conducted a prospective randomised controlled trial on the use of compression stockings after endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein. One hundred and nine patients were approached with 93 finally randomised to use compression stockings for 2 days (Group A) and 7 days (Group B), respectively. All patients were followed up for 3 months post-treatment and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain was recorded at 48 hours, 1 week and 6 weeks. A physical examination and quality of life was assessed at 1 week and 6 weeks. Occlusion rate at the 3 month point was also evaluated. Physical function and vitality was shown to be significantly better in group B at 1 week follow-up, but there was no statistically significant difference at 6 weeks. At 1 week, it was also noted that the VAS score in group B (VAS score 2.0 ± 1.1) was significantly lower than in patients wearing compression stockings for 48 hours (VAS score 3.7 ± 2.1) (p≤0.001)10. No significant difference was, however, observed at 6 weeks post-procedure. Limitations of the study include the high drop out of the trial (40 out of the initial 109 approached) and the absence of any phlebectomies or sclerotherapy in the patients.
Elderman et al. carried out a randomised trial to assess the effect of compression stockings after endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) for great saphenous vein incompetence. Patients' reported pain scores and quality of life scores was evaluated on the day of the procedure, 2-3 days afterwards and 2-6 weeks post-procedure. A total of 111 patients were randomised to stockings (n=55) and no stockings (n=56). There was a statistically significant difference in the pain scores in favour of the stockings group up to day 7, but this difference was no longer present by week 6. There was also a greater use of analgesia in patients in the no stockings group compared to patients wearing stockings (p\<0.05). In addition, patients wearing stockings reported a statistically significantly higher score of satisfaction at 2 days (4.44 vs 4.15) and at 6 weeks (4.59 vs 4.18). The absolute difference was, however, small. Two notable limitations of the study were the high level of drop outs (16 from each group) and the absence of any blinding.
Hamel-Desnos et al. undertook a randomised controlled trial looking at the effect of compression in patients receiving foam sclerotherapy of the saphenous vein. They noted that patients with compression had similar pain and quality of life scores to patients not wearing any compression. They concluded that additional use of compression had no impact on the effectiveness of obliteration of veins, satisfaction scores, symptoms and quality of life, and that further controlled trials was needed to answer the question of whether using compression results in any difference to the outcome of varicose vein procedures.
The investigators, therefore, propose to undertake a multicentre randomised study looking at the effect of compression therapy after endovenous thermal ablation.
Description
This will be a multicentre randomised clinical trial looking at the impact of wearing or not wearing compression stocking following endothermal ablation (either endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) of incompetent truncal veins. Those requiring concurrent phlebectomies or foam injection will be excluded.
Patients will be randomised into group A (compression) and group B (no compression). Only the use of compression will be randomised while the decision as to which treatment to use will be at the discretion of the clinical team.
Target Population
Patients referred for treatment of symptomatic varicose veins will be recruited if they are found to have primary great saphenous (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) incompetence on colour duplex scan.
Intervention
Patients will be randomised to have compression (group A) or no compression (group B). The compression therapy used will be Class II compression stockings. The treatment offered will be endothermal ablation (either endovenous laser treatment (EVLT) or radiofrequency ablation (RFA)) of incompetent truncal veins. Concurrent phlebectomy or foam sclerotherapy will not be carried out.
Patients randomised to group A will be asked to wear compression stockings for 1 week.
Patients randomised to group B will not be provided with any compression.
At baseline, patients will be asked to fill quality of life questionnaires (EQ-5D, AVVQ and CIVIQ) and will have their clinical scores assessed (CEAP and VCSS). On discharge after their varicose vein intervention, they will then be provided with a diary to record their post-procedural pain every day for 10 days using a validated visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as to record when they return to their normal activities and are back to work. They will also be asked to attend a follow-up in 2 weeks and at 6 months.
Patients' GP will also be sent a letter to inform them of their patient's participation in the study.
Follow-up
Patients will be followed up in the outpatient clinic at 2 weeks and 6 months.
Follow-up at 2 Weeks At the 2 weeks' follow-up, the diary containing details of the pain scores and how soon patients were able to return to normal activities/work will be collected. In addition, patients will be asked about any bruising or phlebitis they have had in the two weeks after their procedure and how compliant they have been with the compression. They will be examined and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) will be recorded. They will also be asked to fill in the EQ-5D, AVVQ and CIVIQ scores.
Follow-up at 6 Months At the 6 months follow-up, patients will be examined and their VCSS will be recorded. They will also be asked to fill the EQ-5D, AVVQ and the CIVIQ scores. They will have a venous Duplex scan to determine occlusion of the treated vein.
Sample Size and Study Duration
The study team estimated the sample size needed to observe a difference of at least 10mm in the VAS score, with a standard deviation of 20mm. With power at 80% and 5% significance equivalence, the study would need to recruit 128 patients (64 per group) to show a difference.
Previous studies looking at compression stockings have shown drop out rates close to 37% at 3 months10. Therefore, if an estimated drop out rate of about 40% by 6 months is used, at least 214 patients would need to be recruited. If at least 2 patients per week are recruited, this will be approximately a total of 208 patients that could potentially be randomised over the course of two years.
With 6 months follow-up, therefore, the study will be running for 24 months with a target recruitment of 214 patients.
Settings The study will be conducted at the Imperial College NHS Trust
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Varicose Veins
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
TREATMENT
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Outcome Assessors
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Compression
Patients randomised to this group will be asked to wear Class II compression stockings for 1 week
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
Class II Compression Stockings (no specific device used)
Intervention Type
DEVICE
This study will be looking at the effect of compression therapy in patients having endothermal treatment for truncal incompetence of their varicose veins
No Compression
Patients randomised to this group will not be provided with any compression
Group Type
NO_INTERVENTION
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Class II Compression Stockings (no specific device used)
This study will be looking at the effect of compression therapy in patients having endothermal treatment for truncal incompetence of their varicose veins
Intervention Type
DEVICE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults over 18 years of age
* Symptomatic GSV or SSV vein reflux \> 0.5 seconds on colour Duplex
* Symptomatic GSV or SSV vein reflux \> 0.5 seconds on colour Duplex
Exclusion Criteria
* Current DVT
* Recurrent varicose veins
* Patients requiring adjuvant treatment of varicose veins
* Arterial disease (ABPI\<0.8)
* Vein diameter \< 3mm
* Patient who are unwilling to participate
* Inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires
* Recurrent varicose veins
* Patients requiring adjuvant treatment of varicose veins
* Arterial disease (ABPI\<0.8)
* Vein diameter \< 3mm
* Patient who are unwilling to participate
* Inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Imperial College London
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College London
London, , United Kingdom
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United Kingdom
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15/LO/0181
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Comparative Clinical Efficacy Between Multi-layer Bandage Pressure Therapy and Gradient Pressure Elastic Stocking Treatment After Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation
NCT06366763
RECRUITING
NA
Surgery or Noninvasive Therapy for Varicose Veins
NCT00529672
UNKNOWN
PHASE3
New Compression Hosiery Versus Standard Class II Compression Stockings After Endothermal Ablation
NCT03477227
COMPLETED
NA
Compont - Varicose Veins of the Lower Extremities
NCT06387264
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
Does Minimal Post-operative Compression Affect the Outcome for Endovenous Ablation in Treating Varicose Vein Patients?
NCT02241707
WITHDRAWN
Compression Therapy Versus Surgery in the Treatment of Superficial Venous Reflux
NCT01701661
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison Trial Between Elastic-compressive Stockings at 21 Versus 32 mmHg
NCT05766579
RECRUITING
NA
Efficacy on Pain Following a Procedure for Injecting Sclerotherapeutic Foam Into the Great Saphenous Vein
NCT01368159
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Compression And Functional Ability After Endovenous Varicose Vein Treatment
NCT03613376
COMPLETED
NA
Elastic Compression Stockings and Varicose Veins Recurrence
NCT04231942
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
COMFORT: A Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Crossover Study
NCT02462720
COMPLETED
PHASE4
Study of Foam Sclerotherapy Versus Ambulatory Phlebectomy
NCT03416413
RECRUITING
PHASE4
Graduated Elastic compRession for vAricose Veins in PrEgnancy
NCT05122195
UNKNOWN
First- or Second- Class Compression Hosiery After Endovenous Laser With Sclerotherapy and Ambulatory Phlebectomy
NCT06913764
COMPLETED
NA
Concomitant or Sequential Phlebectomy After Endovenous Laser Therapy for Varicose Veins
NCT02017106
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of Treatments in Venous Insufficiency
NCT01298908
COMPLETED
NA
Compression Aided Management of Edema in Patients With C3 Venous Disease
NCT00766974
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
Mechanochemical Ablation Compared to Cyanoacrylate Adhesive
NCT03392753
COMPLETED
NA
Endovenous RFA Versus Ligation and Striping for Varicose Veins
NCT04526626
UNKNOWN
NA
Steam Ablation Versus Endovenous Laser Ablation for the Treatment of Great Saphenous Veins
NCT02046967
COMPLETED
NA
Adding a Combined Program of Therapeutic Exercise and Self-massage to the Conventional Approach of Compression Stockings and Preventive Measures in Chronic Venous Insufficiency.
NCT06727968
COMPLETED
NA
Early Glue Saphenous Vein Ablation With Compression Versus Compression Alone in the Healing of the Venous Ulcer
NCT03666754
UNKNOWN
NA