Prediction of PaO2 Values Using the PRoPERLy II Database

NCT ID: NCT06589427

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

8000 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Four prospective observational studies of ventilation in critically ill patients were harmonized and pooled.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The individual data from four observational studies ('Epidemiology of Respiratory Insufficiency in Critical Care study' \[ERICC\], the 'Large Observational Study to Understand the Global Impact of Severe Acute Respiratory Failure' \[LUNG SAFE\], 'PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients without ARDS' \[PRoVENT\], 'PRactice of VENTilation in critically ill patients in Middle-income Countries' \[PRoVENT-iMiC\]) were harmonized and pooled into a database named 'PRoPERLy II'. This database will be used to address various issues in diverse patient categories.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Invasive Ventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Invasively ventilated intensive care unit patients.

Critically ill patients receiving invasive ventilation for various reasons, like ARDS, or AHRF.

Invasive ventilation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients were subjected to invasive ventilation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Invasive ventilation.

Patients were subjected to invasive ventilation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Respiratory support.

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

LUNG SAFE included patients aged 16 years or older that received invasive or noninvasive ventilation. LUNG SAFE excluded patients without informed consent. LUNG SAFE enrolled patients during a 4-week period in the winter months.

PRoVENT included patients aged 18 years or older that received invasive ventilation. PRoVENT excluded patients in whom ventilation was started before the study recruitment week, patients receiving only noninvasive ventilation, and patients that were transferred to the ICU from another hospital under ventilation. PRoVENT enrolled patients during 4-week period.

PRoVENT-iMiC included patients aged 18 years or older that started with invasive ventilation. They excluded patients that received only noninvasive ventilation, patients whose invasive ventilation started before the inclusion phase of the study, and patients transferred from another hospital while under ventilation. PRoVENT-iMiC enrolled patients during 4-week period.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Prof. Dr. Marcus J. Schultz

Prof. Dr

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marcus J Schultz

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amsterdam UMC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRoPERLy-II

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.