Positive Education Through Social Media to Reduce Negative Stereotypes Towards Old Age

NCT ID: NCT06574243

Last Updated: 2024-08-27

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 109 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2022-10-22
• Study Completion Date: 2023-05-15

Brief Summary

Introduction and Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of positive psychoeducation regarding aging, disseminated through social media channels, in mitigating negative stereotypes. Additionally, we aim to explore any potential associations between various sociodemographic variables and the prevalence of negative stereotypes towards the elderly.

Methods: This quasi-experimental study involved an experimental group comprising subjects who underwent a 7-day intervention. The study aimed to evaluate any alterations in negative stereotypes towards aging both before and after the intervention. The intervention consisted of daily publication of positive messages about aging on a social media account. Two questionnaires were used: one collecting sociodemographic variables and the Questionnaire for Evaluating Negative Stereotypes towards Aging. Snowball sampling through social media was employed, with 109 subjects completing the study.

Detailed Description

This was a quasi-experimental prospective study that used snowball sampling to recruit participants. The study was publicized through Instagram accounts of two authors with a combined following of over 100,000. Of the initial 250 participants, 109 completed the study. Inclusion criteria included:

1. Being over 18 years old.

2. Participating in both the PRE and POST questionnaires of the Negative Stereotypes towards Old Age Questionnaire (CENVE).

3. Following the Instagram posts related to the intervention for 3 days or more.

Instruments:

The evaluation instruments for this study included two online Google Forms questionnaires (See in Supplementary Material) designed for pre- and post-assessment. The pre-assessment questionnaire consisted of two sections: 16 items on sociodemographic data and 15 items from the Negative Stereotypes towards Old Age Questionnaire (CENVE) (Blanca et al., 2005). This instrument assesses individuals' stereotypes towards the older population using a Likert-type response scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Somewhat Disagree, 3 = Somewhat Agree, 4 = Strongly Agree). It provides a total score and three dimensions: Health Dimension, Social Motivation Dimension, and Character/Personality Dimension. The maximum score on this questionnaire is 60 points (indicating a high presence of negative stereotypes towards old age), and the minimum score is 15 points (indicating a low presence of such stereotypes).

Procedure:

Both at the initial and final questionnaire stages, that is, before and after the 7-day intervention period of reading the posts, was administered the questionnaire CENVE. Additionally, the post-intervention evaluation included a new question that gathered data on the frequency with which the participant had followed the intervention (0-2, 3-4, and 5-7 days).

Intervention The intervention consisted of daily positive messages about aging posted on an Instagram account (@laetapaplateada), created specifically for this study, and was conducted over the course of a week. Examples included "The ability to make decisions improves with age" and "Emotional regulation improves with age" (David, 2017). These posts were accompanied by their respective author references.

Statistical Analysis:

A paired samples t-test was conducted to compare each subject's total score on the CENVE scale before and after the intervention. To determine if certain sociodemographic variables were associated with the presence of negative stereotypes towards old age, the scores obtained in the PRE questionnaire for each study group were analyzed using descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing. This analysis was performed using Student's t-test (for variables with 2 categories) or ANOVA (for variables with more than 2 categories). The analysis of the "sex" variable was omitted due to low male participation.

Furthermore, to examine if various demographic variables were associated with pre-post differences in the presentation of negative stereotypes towards older people, a Repeated Measures ANOVA was performed for each of the sociodemographic variables collected in the questionnaires: sex, age, marital status, place of residence, cohabitants, religion, education level, occupation, frequency of contact with older people, area of contact with older people, cohabitation with older people, relationship with grandparents, significance level of that relationship, knowledge of any of their grandparents' loss of abilities (physical/mental), frequency of viewing intervention posts on Instagram, etc.

All tests were analyzed using the statistical software Jamovi 2.3.21. Data for the assessment of negative stereotypes towards old age were collected in February and March 2023.

Conditions

Ageism

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: OTHER
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Social media education

The intervention consisted of daily positive messages about aging posted on an Instagram account (@laetapaplateada), created specifically for this study, and was conducted over the course of a week. Examples included "The ability to make decisions improves with age" and "Emotional regulation improves with age" (David, 2017). These posts were accompanied by their respective author references

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

1. Being over 18 years old.

2. Participating in both the PRE and POST questionnaires of the Negative Stereotypes towards Old Age Questionnaire (CENVE).

3. Following the Instagram posts related to the intervention for 3 days or more.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Being under 18 years old.

2. Participating in only one questionnaire

3. Following the Instagram posts related to the intervention for less than 3 days.

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Universidad de Zaragoza

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Elena de la Fuente

Doctor

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Universidad de Zaragoza

Zaragoza, Zarazgoza, Spain

Countries

Spain

References

Olshansky S, Biggs S, Achenbaum W, Davison G, Fried L, Gutman G, et al. The Global Agenda Council on the Ageing Society: Policy Principles. Global Policy. 2011;2:97-105.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

World Health Organisation. Global report on ageism.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

North MS, Fiske ST. Modern Attitudes Toward Older Adults in the Aging World: A Cross-Cultural Meta-Analysis. Psychol Bull. 2015 Sep;141(5):993-1021. doi: 10.1037/a0039469. Epub 2015 Jul 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26191955 (View on PubMed)

Levy BR, Slade MD, Chang ES, Kannoth S, Wang SY. Ageism Amplifies Cost and Prevalence of Health Conditions. Gerontologist. 2020 Jan 24;60(1):174-181. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny131.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30423119 (View on PubMed)

Kornadt AE, Pauly T, Schilling OK, Kunzmann U, Katzorreck M, Lucke AJ, Hoppmann CA, Gerstorf D, Wahl HW. Momentary subjective age is associated with perceived and physiological stress in the daily lives of old and very old adults. Psychol Aging. 2022 Dec;37(8):863-875. doi: 10.1037/pag0000711. Epub 2022 Sep 22.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 36136787 (View on PubMed)

Nelson TD. Promoting healthy aging by confronting ageism. Am Psychol. 2016 May-Jun;71(4):276-82. doi: 10.1037/a0040221.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27159434 (View on PubMed)

Hannah J. Swift. The Risks of Ageism Model: How Ageism and Negative Attitudes toward Age Can Be a Barrier to Active Aging.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Burnes D, Sheppard C, Henderson CR Jr, Wassel M, Cope R, Barber C, Pillemer K. Interventions to Reduce Ageism Against Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Public Health. 2019 Aug;109(8):e1-e9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.305123. Epub 2019 Jun 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31219720 (View on PubMed)

Dulcey Ruiz E, Uribe Valdivieso C. Sistema de Información Científica [Internet]. Vol. 34, Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=80534202

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Levin JS, Chatters LM. Religion, health, and psychological well-being in older adults: findings from three national surveys. J Aging Health. 1998 Nov;10(4):504-31. doi: 10.1177/089826439801000406.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10346697 (View on PubMed)

Crawford PA. Rock of Ages: Developing Healthy Perspectives of Aging in the Elementary Grades. Child Educ. 2015;91:395-401.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Jiménez TMM. Redes sociales en prevención y promoción de la salud. Una revisión de la actualidad = Social networks in prevention and health promotion. A review of the current. REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE COMUNICACIÓN EN SALUD. 2015 [cited 2024 Feb 1];62-9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Valle CG, Tate DF, Mayer DK, Allicock M, Cai J. A randomized trial of a Facebook-based physical activity intervention for young adult cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2013 Sep;7(3):355-68. doi: 10.1007/s11764-013-0279-5. Epub 2013 Mar 27.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23532799 (View on PubMed)

Ridout B, Campbell A. Using Facebook to deliver a social norm intervention to reduce problem drinking at university. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2014 Nov;33(6):667-73. doi: 10.1111/dar.12141. Epub 2014 Apr 1.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24689339 (View on PubMed)

Pechmann C, Delucchi K, Lakon CM, Prochaska JJ. Randomised controlled trial evaluation of Tweet2Quit: a social network quit-smoking intervention. Tob Control. 2017 Mar;26(2):188-194. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052768. Epub 2016 Feb 29.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26928205 (View on PubMed)

Silfee VJ, Haughton CF, Jake-Schoffman DE, Lopez-Cepero A, May CN, Sreedhara M, Rosal MC, Lemon SC. Objective measurement of physical activity outcomes in lifestyle interventions among adults: A systematic review. Prev Med Rep. 2018 May 10;11:74-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.05.003. eCollection 2018 Sep.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29984142 (View on PubMed)

Alshahrani A, Siddiqui A, Khalil S, Farag S, Alshahrani N, Alsabaani A, Korairi H. WhatsApp-based intervention for promoting physical activity among female college students, Saudi Arabia: a randomized controlled trial. East Mediterr Health J. 2021 Aug 26;27(8):782-789. doi: 10.26719/emhj.21.012.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 34486714 (View on PubMed)

Leong CM, Lee TI, Chien YM, Kuo LN, Kuo YF, Chen HY. Social Media-Delivered Patient Education to Enhance Self-management and Attitudes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2022 Mar 23;24(3):e31449. doi: 10.2196/31449.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 35319478 (View on PubMed)

Sanchez LM, Park SY, Kohnen T, Sarnquist B, Jeon HJJ, Granner M, Morning K, MacNeil P, Deavers O, Soto V, Christiansen E. Social media intervention for promoting breastfeeding among WIC participants. Food Sci Nutr. 2023 Aug 23;11(11):6945-6954. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3620. eCollection 2023 Nov.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 37970423 (View on PubMed)

Fingerman K, Trevino K. Don't Lump Seniors Together on Coronavirus. Older People Aren't All the Same. USA Today. 2020 Apr 7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Wahl H-W, Gerstorf D. A conceptual framework for studying Context Dynamics in Aging (CODA). Dev Rev. 2018;50(Part B):155-176.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Sanchez Palacios C, Trianes Torres MV, Blanca Mena MJ. [Aging negative stereotypes and their relationship with sociodemographic variables over 65 elderly]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2009 May-Jun;44(3):124-9. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2008.12.008. Epub 2009 May 14. Spanish.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19446376 (View on PubMed)

Menendez Alvarez-Dardet S, Cuevas-Toro AM, Perez-Padilla J, Lorence Lara B. [Assessment of negative stereotypes about old age in young people and adults]. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2016 Nov-Dec;51(6):323-328. doi: 10.1016/j.regg.2015.12.003. Epub 2016 Jan 28. Spanish.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26826942 (View on PubMed)

Antonio Hidalgo Sacristán. Estereotipos edadistas en una muestra de adultos jóvenes.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Colás P, Villaciervos P. La interiorización de los estereotipos de género en jóvenes y adolescentes. Revista de Investigación Educativa. 2007;25(1).

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Kim HH, Jung JH. Ageism, Religiosity, and Wellbeing Among Older Adults: Evidence From the European Social Survey (ESS4). Res Aging. 2021 May;43(5-6):214-226. doi: 10.1177/0164027520953632. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 32873186 (View on PubMed)

Stevens-Long J, Michaud G. THEORY IN ADULT DEVELOPMENT: The New Paradigm and the Problem of Direction.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Officer A, de la Fuente-Nunez V. A global campaign to combat ageism. Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Apr 1;96(4):295-296. doi: 10.2471/BLT.17.202424. Epub 2018 Mar 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 29695887 (View on PubMed)

Coq D, Rosario H, Chaves A. Metodología de Encuestas A EMPRESARIOS ANDALUCES. 2002 [cited 2024 Feb 1];4:211-25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

Fuente-Hernandez L, de la Fuente-Ruiz E, Gracia-Garcia P, Serrano-Garcia I, Alvarez-Mon MA, Molina-Ruiz RM. Using social media-based positive education to challenge negative stereotypes of aging: a quasi-experimental approach. BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):533. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21327-0.

Reference Type: DERIVED

PMID: 39930436 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

U1111-1311-9233

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id