Longevity of Prefabricated Band and Loop Versus Conventional Band and Loop Space Maintainers
NCT ID: NCT06573463
Last Updated: 2024-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-01
2025-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A Randomized Clinical Trial
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Success Rate of Prefabricated Versus Conventional Band and Loop Space Maintainers in Children With Prematurely Lost First Primary Molars
NCT06558812
Different Designs of Space Maintainer
NCT05693870
Clinical Evaluation of Bonded Versus Banded Space Maintainers
NCT05087147
Using Multi-looped Lingual Retainer to Relief Anterior Mandibular Crowding
NCT06337435
"Three Dimensional Assessment of Maxillary Molars Following Distalization Using Two Different Approaches"
NCT06240923
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The concept of preserving space after premature tooth loss has been recognized for over a century. Conventional appliances are used successfully as space maintainers, but some disadvantages like the need for at least two visits to deliver the appliance due to laboratory work, will definitely affect its role during the general anesthesia.
The prefabricated space maintainer requires only one visit as it is fitted into the patient's mouth at the clinic without needing the dental lab. This provides a good impact on apprehensive children as it reduces the number of visits and chairside time. Prefabricated space maintainers could be a new alternative to the conventional fixed space maintainers used in pediatric dentistry.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Outcome assessor and Statistician will be blinded from the intervention and control not knowing which group represents which procedure.
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional band and loop
Conventional band and loop is the most widely used space maintainer, and the most effective. It shows high success rate and good patient compliance, but it needs more than one visit to be applied.
Conventional Band and loop
Conventional band and loop is the most widely used space maintainer, It shows high success rate and good patient compliance, but needs more than one visit due to the laboratory work.
Prefabricated band and loop
Prefabricated space maintainer requires only one visit as it fits into the patient's mouth at the clinic without needing the dental lab. It comes in a kit with different band sizes.
Prefabricated band and loop
Prefabricated space maintainer requires only one visit as it fits into the patient's mouth at the clinic without needing the dental lab. It comes in a kit with different band sizes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Prefabricated band and loop
Prefabricated space maintainer requires only one visit as it fits into the patient's mouth at the clinic without needing the dental lab. It comes in a kit with different band sizes.
Conventional Band and loop
Conventional band and loop is the most widely used space maintainer, It shows high success rate and good patient compliance, but needs more than one visit due to the laboratory work.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Caries free, or restored mandibular second primary molars and deciduous canines on the side of the extraction maintained throughout the entire follow-up period.
* Children are classified as cooperative or potentially cooperative according to Wright's classification of child behavior.
* According to space analysis, available space is less than or equal to the needed space
* 1/3 to less than 2/3 of the root of the permanent successor is formed to the prematurely lost primary molars
* Children are mentally capable of communication.
* Children aged 4-6 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Children with previous allergies to stainless steel.
* Permanent successors with 2/3 of its roots formed and space analysis does not indicate the fabrication of space maintainer.
* Parental refusal of participation.
4 Years
6 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lamis Abdelkhalek Mohamed Badawi
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dina Y El Kharadly, Lecturer
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
October 6 University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo university
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kamki H, Kalaskar R, Balasubramanian S, Badhe H, Kalaskar A. Clinical Effectiveness of Fiber-reinforced Composite Space Maintainer and Band and Loop Space Maintainer in a Pediatric Patient: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021;14(Suppl 1):S82-S93. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2044.
Tahririan D, Safaripour M, Eshghi A, Bonyadian AH. Comparison of the longevity of prefabricated and conventional band and loops in children's primary teeth. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2019 Nov 12;16(6):428-434. eCollection 2019 Nov-Dec.
Padma Kumari B, Retnakumari N. Loss of space and changes in the dental arch after premature loss of the lower primary molar: a longitudinal study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2006 Jun;24(2):90-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.26023.
Thakur B, Bhardwaj A, Luke AM, Wahjuningrum DA. Effectiveness of traditional band and loop space maintainer vs 3D-printed space maintainer following the loss of primary teeth: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 18;14(1):14081. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61743-7.
Zhao J, Jin H, Li X, Qin X. Dental arch spatial changes after premature loss of first primary molars: a systematic review and meta-analysis of split-mouth studies. BMC Oral Health. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03111-x.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Conventional vs prefabricated
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.