Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique
NCT ID: NCT03572179
Last Updated: 2021-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-01
2020-03-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding
NCT03564717
Comparison of Perforated 3D Printed Versus Conventional Metal Fixed Bonded Retainer
NCT06851897
Evaluation of The Stability of Orthodontic Treatment After First Premolar Extraction Using Combined Retention Protocol
NCT06502886
Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients
NCT07107100
Dentoskeletal Effects of 3D-Printed Fixed Twin Block Versus MARA Appliances in Management of Skeletal Class II
NCT07340242
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
\- Although there are many studies in the literature concerning methods of bonding of mandibular retainers whether directly or indirectly, there is a very limited evidence regarding their chair side time and bond failure. Also there are scarce data on fixed mandibular retainers bonded using 3D printed positioning tray.
Choice of the comparator:
In the ongoing study, direct bonding of mandibular fixed retainer will be the control group. Thus, conducting a well-designed randomized clinical trial evaluating the chair side time and bond failure of 3d printed positioning tray and direct bonding method of fixed mandibular retainer.
Study rationale:
To evaluate and compare bond failure and chair side time by 3D printed positioning tray and direct bonding method of mandibular fixed retainer.
Null hypothesis:
1. The time needed for direct indirect bonding using 3D digital positioning tray of a mandibular fixed retainer is shorter than the time needed for direct bonding, and (2) there is no difference in failures between the 2 bonding methods.
Research question:
Will the 3D digital positioning tray reduce chair side time, bond failure during retainer placement in patient with need of fixed bonded mandibular retainer, when compared to direct bonding method?
Aim of the study:
To evaluate chair side time and bond failure of 3D digital positioning tray during mandibular retainer placement and direct bonding of mandibular retainer.
2. Objectives
Primary objective To evaluate effect of 3D Digital positioning Tray on chair side time Secondary outcome Immediate bond failure and bond failure during first 6 month of placement of mandibular fixed retainer.
PICOTs format:
P: patient with the need of fixed bonded mandibular retainer after orthodontic treatment I: 3D printed Digital positioning Tray for bonding mandibular retainer. C: conventional direct bonding of mandibular retainer O: chair side time, immediate bond failure and bond failure during first 6 month.
Outcome Name,Measuring Tool and Measuring unit Primary is the Chair side Time measured by Digital stopwatch in Seconds Immediate Bond Failure is the Number of Debonded mandibular fixed retainer measured in Numerical value Bond failure during first 6 month follow up by the Number of Debonded mandibular fixed retainer measured in Numerical value
T: Immediate and T2: 6 month follow up S: Randomized controlled trial.
3. Trial Design This trial is designed as a parallel, randomized, controlled trial with allocation ratio 1:1.It will be performed at the educational hospital of the Faculty of Oral \& Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
Materials \& Methods:
I. Participants, Intervention and Outcomes
A) Study setting:
* Source of patients: patients who finished their orthodontic treatment at the outpatient clinic in Orthodontic department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo government, Egypt.
* Time: 2017-2018 The study will last for 6 months.
C) Intervention Treatment Group After finishing orthodontic treatment, all patient will receive a modified indirect technique for bonding fixed mandibular retainer and the key of modification is the fabrication of 3D printed digital positioning tray for placement of retainer with holes for composite pads for its direct application using 3 shape Ortho analyser Software ® instead of conventional indirect retainer fabrication method The sample selection and screening for inclusion of patients in clinical trial will be performed at all patients at clinic of Orthodontic department, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
Scanning of impression and designing the digital tray Lower impression is taken for each patient and the cast will be carefully scanned by desktop laser scanner for production of digital cast, using 3 shape ortho analyser Software®, the tray will be designed Fabrication and printing of the digital tray Using Dent1 3D printer® (Mogassam®, Greek campus, Cairo, Egypt), the tray will be printed Clinical application of the digital tray
* Teeth to be bonded are polished and etched.
* Teeth isolation \& moisture control are achieved.
* Dead Soft Stainless Steel wire is placed and adapted in its place in the digital tray.
* Placement of the tray in the patient mouth on the prepared teeth
* Adhesive bond is applied to teeth and then curing of the adhesive bonding.
* 3M ® composite (3M Unitek company , Monrovia, California, USA) is placed in the printed tray holes and any excess composite will be removed and then light curing is done.
* Time will be recorded during this step
Removal of digital tray After insuring complete curing of the composite the digital tray is then removed from patient mouth, Bond failure of composite pads will be checked in this step and recorded.
Control Group All patients of this group will follow conventional steps of direct bonding procedure of fixed mandibular retainer
* Pumice and polish the lingual surface of teeth on which retainer is to be bonded
* The retainer wire is prefabricated by incorporating perpendicular pieces of 1.5"-2" ligature wire at interdental region of respective teeth
* The retainer wire is then adapted on the tooth surface. The short ligatures are passed interdentally one occlusal to contact point and other gingival to contact point and tied over.
* Bonding procedure after etching and application of sealant is carried out.
* Enough adhesive should be used. Light curing is done.
* 3M ® composite (3M Unitek company, Monrovia, California, USA) is placed then light curing is done.
* Cut the ligature wires and pull them laically to disengage.
* Time will be recorded during this step
F) Sample Size calculation:
the sample is increased to a total size of 20 participants; 10 in each arm.
G) Recruitment strategy:
* Patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of the orthodontic Department - Cairo University
* Consecutive sampling is done through screening of patients. This will continue until the target population is achieved.
* Identifying and recruiting potential subjects is achieved through patient database.
II. Assignment of Interventions
A) Sequence generation:
It will be performed as 1:1 allocation. The sequence of the two groups will be done by computer generated random numbers. This will be done by using Microsoft Office Excel 2013 sheet
B) Allocation Concealment:
Random numbers obtained by random sequence generation will be written on white papers, each paper will be kept in sealed envelope. Sealed envelopes will be kept in box at the secretary of orthodontic department office.
C) Implementation:
Implementation will be carried out in the secretary of the orthodontic department at the Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University.
D) Blinding:
Participants Patients can detect the transfer tray so blinding is not possible Operator The main operator is responsible for the bonding so the blinding is not possible Assessor The assessor (different from main operator will carry out the measurement blindly
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Treatment Group
After finishing orthodontic treatment, all patient will receive a modified indirect technique for bonding fixed mandibular retainer and the key of modification is the fabrication of 3D printed digital positioning tray for placement of retainer with holes for composite pads for its direct application using 3 shape Ortho analyser Software ® instead of conventional indirect retainer fabrication method
3d printed positioning tray
3d printed positioning tray for lingual fixed retainer placement in treatment group
Control Group
All patients of this group will follow conventional steps of direct bonding procedure of fixed mandibular retainer
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3d printed positioning tray
3d printed positioning tray for lingual fixed retainer placement in treatment group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* the presence of the 4 mandibular incisors and the 2 mandibular canines,
* No active caries, restorations, fractures, or periodontal disease of these teeth
* Patient with Good oral hygiene
Exclusion Criteria
* No or poor patient's co operation
* Abnormal morphology of anterior teeth
* Bad oral hygiene
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Raghda Alaa
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Raghda Alaa
principal investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBD-CU-2018-04-28
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.