Evaluation of Segmented Versus Full Arch Three Dimensionally Printed Transfer Tray for Orthodontic Indirect Bonding

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

132 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is conducted to overcome the problems of conventional indirect bonding technique, through investigating accuracy of two novel three dimensionally digitally printed indirect bonding transfer trays (full arch \& segmented) in terms of accuracy of transferring brackets, rate of immediate bond failure and chair side time.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison Between Digital 3D Printed Transfer Tray Versus Thermoformed Transfer Tray for Indirect Bonding

NCT03363607

Orthodontic Indirect Bonding

UNKNOWN NA

Accuracy of 3DPrinted Windowed Bracket- Positioning Guide Compared To Thermoformed Indirect Bonding Tray

NCT03585881

Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Digitally Printed Transfer Tray With Windows and Conventional Thermoformed Transfer Tray

UNKNOWN NA

Clinical Investigation of the Transfer Accuracy of Semi-Digital and Fully Digital Indirect Bonding Trays

NCT07318857

Indirect Bonding

COMPLETED NA

Chairside Time and Accuracy of Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Attachments Using Double Versus Single Transfer Tray

NCT03362034

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluation of Fixed Mandibular Retainer Using 3D Printed Positioning Tray Versus Direct Bonding Technique

NCT03572179

Orthodontic Appliance Complication

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fourteen patients (7 in each group) with mild to moderate crowding, requiring orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars, will be selected for this study. A total of 196 brackets will be used (98 Full Arch Tray and 98 Segment Arch Tray). The same bracket type and bonding material will used in both groups. The accuracy of bracket transfer will be measured by 3 Shape Ortho planner software (Bracket Placement Module), rate of bond failure by counting number of debonded brackets upon tray removal \& chair side time by using digital watch.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Inaccurate Transfer and Bond Failure of Conventional Indirect Bonding Tray Accuracy of Bracket Transfer and Bond Failure Rate of Full Arch and Segmented Digitally Printed Trays

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Segmented Three dimensionally printed transfer tray

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer tray

Intervention Type OTHER

Segmented indirect bonding transfer tray

Full arch three dimensionally printed transfer tray

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Segmented three dimensionally printed transfer tray

Segmented indirect bonding transfer tray

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients seeking fixed orthodontic treatment with full set of permanent teeth including second molars.
2. No sex predilection.
3. Mild to moderate crowding cases (4-6 mm).

Exclusion Criteria

1. Severely rotated teeth
2. Enamel hypoplasia or hypocalcification.
3. Systemic disease that contraindicates orthodontic treatment.
4. Presence of deep carious lesions or large restorations.
5. No or poor patient's compliance \& bad oral hygiene.
6. Psychological problems.

Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

38 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No