Tooth Borne Versus Temporary Anchorage Devices (TAD) Based Intrusion Systems for the Correction of Anterior Deep Overbite

NCT ID: NCT06430710

Last Updated: 2024-05-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-09-25

Study Completion Date

2024-03-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Compare the tooth borne versus fixed orthodontic intrusive system (TADs) for the correction of anterior deep overbite

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

this study determined which method was more compliant, efficacy and comfortable. It was performed to evaluate intrusion of upper incisors with applying tooth borne system as Connecticut Intrusion Arch (CIA) and temporary anchorage devices (TADs) \[miniscrew\] and evaluate the dental and skeletal cephalometric effects of these intrusion methods on individuals with deep bite caused by supraocclusion of upper incisors. It also evaluated oral hygiene and pain sensation in the two groups during the study period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Deep Overbite

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Sixteen patients with anterior deep over bite participated in two groups each group contains eight patients
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Mninscrew

Miniscrews for incisor intrusion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intrusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

2 different methods for incisor intrusion

Intrusive arch

Continuous arch technique for incisor intrusion

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intrusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

2 different methods for incisor intrusion

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intrusion

2 different methods for incisor intrusion

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Class I or Class II malocclusion with minimal crowding.
2. 70% to 100% overbite.
3. High lip line with gingival display on smiling and super-eruption of maxillary incisors.
4. All patients had permanent dentition with average to vertical growth pattern and curve of Spee of 4mm or less.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Having missing teeth on the anterior maxillary area.
2. Any history of trauma or root canal treatment.
3. Previous orthodontic treatment.
4. Low lip line duing social smile.
5. Having any hormonal disorder or syndromes.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

22 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Faculty of Dental Medicine for Girls

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Al-Azhar University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ORTHO-109-2H

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.