Comparing Jaw Tracking and Traditional Methods for Measuring Bite Accuracy in Patients With Teeth
NCT ID: NCT07203703
Last Updated: 2025-10-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
18 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-10-15
2026-02-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction and Biting Force of New Design of Extracoronal Attachment (O T Cap Unilateral Attachment) Versus Conventional Partial Denture for Treatment of Unilateral Mandibular Distal Extension Area
NCT02951507
AMOUNT OF INTRAORAL OCCLUSAL ADJUSTMENTS IN OCCLUSAL SPLINTS FABRICATED USING FULLY DIGITAL VERSUS COMBINED DIGITAL WORKFLOW IN TMD PATIENTS
NCT06752200
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of CAD/CAM vs Conventionally Constructed Occlusal Splints in Patients With Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
NCT04591899
Evaluation of the Efficiency of Single Aligner Appliance for Treatment of Mild Crowding Cases in Adults.
NCT04988373
Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lower-Clear-Plate-Based Intermaxillary Traction
NCT06596239
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The two mounting techniques being compared are:
Jaw Tracking Device-Based Mounting This is a digital approach that utilizes a jaw tracking system to record the patient's mandibular movements accurately. The device captures dynamic jaw positions in real time, allowing for precise simulation of the patient's occlusion on an articulator or in a digital environment.
Conventional Mounting Technique This is the traditional, manual method using mechanical articulators. It typically involves facebow transfer and static bite records to mount the maxillary and mandibular casts in the assumed position. While widely used, this method may be prone to human error and variability.
The primary objective of the study is to assess and compare the accuracy of these two mounting techniques by examining how closely each one replicates the actual occlusal contact points observed intraorally. Occlusal contacts are critical in diagnosing and planning treatments in prosthodontics, orthodontics, and restorative dentistry.
By evaluating these contacts using both methods, the study aims to determine:
Which technique provides a more accurate representation of the patient's true occlusion.
The potential clinical implications of using a jaw tracking device over conventional methods.
Whether digital methods can improve diagnostic reliability and treatment outcomes in daily dental practice.
This study is expected to contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting digital technologies in dentistry, offering insights into their clinical accuracy and potential to replace or supplement traditional techniques.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional Mounting Technique
Jaw Tracking Device
A jaw tracking device is a digital tool that records real-time jaw movements to accurately analyze occlusion and assist in virtual model mounting.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Jaw Tracking Device
A jaw tracking device is a digital tool that records real-time jaw movements to accurately analyze occlusion and assist in virtual model mounting.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Omer Abdelmagid
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Omer Abdelmagid
Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nouran A Abdel Nabi, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tejo SK, Kumar AG, Kattimani VS, Desai PD, Nalla S, Chaitanya K K. A comparative evaluation of dimensional stability of three types of interocclusal recording materials-an in-vitro multi-centre study. Head Face Med. 2012 Oct 5;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1746-160X-8-27.
Rohrle O, Waddell JN, Foster KD, Saini H, Pullan AJ. Using a motion-capture system to record dynamic articulation for application in CAD/CAM software. J Prosthodont. 2009 Dec;18(8):703-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00510.x. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
Pieper R. Digital impressions--easier than ever. Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(1):47-52. English, German.
Kurbad A. Impression-free production techniques. Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(1):59-66. English, German.
Kordass B. Clinical dental CAD/CAM--qualification for tomorrow's networked dentistry. Int J Comput Dent. 2010;13(1):3-6. No abstract available. English, German.
de Carvalho Ode T. A new fully adjustable articulator system and procedure. J Prosthet Dent. 1998 Sep;80(3):376-86. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(98)70141-6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
14422022455531
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.