Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-03
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients. The results of this study will potentially serve as pilot data for the design of a larger study that involves the full assessment of the VR headset and its VF test, based on various testing strategies.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Feasibility, Accuracy, and Reproducibility of Virtual Reality Visual Field Testing in Patients With Glaucoma
NCT07063537
Evaluating Home Testing Devices for the Management of Glaucoma
NCT05325996
Persistence of Glaucoma Patients With Web-Browser-Based Visual Field Test
NCT05690152
Glaucoma Screening
NCT06186388
Evaluation of a Novel Head-Mounted Device for Glaucoma Testing: A Proof-of-Concept Study
NCT05030714
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Ophthalmic screening:
(a) Visual acuity, slit lamp exam, rebound tonometry (all subjects)
2. OCT examination of the study eye with the Topcon Maestro2 Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT):
(a) Standard Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL), Optic Disc and Ganglion Cell Complex (GCC) scan patterns (i) Fundus photo is automatically obtained. (b) Abnormalities consistent with ophthalmic disease will be an exclusion for the healthy group of subjects. Reasonable and common artifacts that do not significantly impair the scan report will be accepted.
(c) OCT abnormalities consistent with glaucoma are expected on the 30 glaucoma subjects.
3. Once eligible, each patient will perform four (4) visual field tests:
(a) once with the HFA Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) Standard 24-2 pattern (i) Reliability criteria: False Positives no higher than 15% (b) three tests with the VR headset: (i) two tests with ZEST strategy (ii) one test with gamified ZEST strategy (c) Counter-balancing will be used to determine the order of (a) and (b). In particular, a study participant will either start with the HFA visual field test and then proceed to the three tests with the VR headset; or, start with the three VR tests and finish with the HFA visual field test. The sequence of the visual field tests for each study ID will be provided by the sponsor.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Healthy subjects
30 healthy subjects
Perimetric test
This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients.
Glaucoma subjects
30 glaucoma patients, 10 mild, 10 moderate, 10 severe
Perimetric test
This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Perimetric test
This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
2. For normal subjects:
1. Patient is free of any current or prior ophthalmic pathologies that would potentially cause visual field defects: e.g. retina pathology, glaucoma, cataracts, keratoconus
2. No ocular surgery other than cataract surgery within 6 months prior to the study visit
3. For glaucoma subjects:
1. Patient has a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma
2. Patient is free of any other current or prior ophthalmic pathologies that would potentially cause visual field defects.
3. No other ocular surgery other than glaucoma or cataract surgery within 6 months prior to the study visit
4. No IOP lower than 10 mm/Hg or higher than 30 mm/Hg
4. Refractive Error:
1. Sphere = up to -6.00 D to and up +3.00
2. Cylinder = up to -3.00 is common
5. No past refractive eye surgery
6. No Multifocal or phakic (ICLs) IOL; no multifocal CLs
7. One eligible eye
8. Ability to sit for standard VF bowl exam. Ability to wear VR perimetry headset device.
25 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Illinois College of Optometry
OTHER
Envision Health Technologies, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Chaglasian, OD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Illinois College of Optometry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Illinois College of Optometry / Illinois Eye Institute
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Montesano G, Bryan SR, Crabb DP, Fogagnolo P, Oddone F, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Lanzetta P, Perdicchi A, Johnson CA, Garway-Heath DF, Brusini P, Rossetti LM. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
Marin-Franch I, Turpin A, Artes PH, Chong LX, McKendrick AM, Alawa KA, Wall M. The Open Perimetry Initiative: A framework for cross-platform development for the new generation of portable perimeters. J Vis. 2022 Apr 6;22(5):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.5.1.
Marin-Franch I, Swanson WH. The visualFields package: a tool for analysis and visualization of visual fields. J Vis. 2013 Mar 14;13(4):10. doi: 10.1167/13.4.10.
Bradley C, Ahmed IIK, Samuelson TW, Chaglasian M, Barnebey H, Radcliffe N, Bacharach J. Validation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ENV1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.