Perimetric Testing With Virtual Reality

NCT ID: NCT06549010

Last Updated: 2024-08-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-03

Study Completion Date

2024-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Perimetry is an essential component in the diagnosis and monitoring of glaucoma. Since the advent of Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP), one of the clinical standards has been the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA, Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany). Visual field (VF) testing provided by the HFA is standard-of-care in glaucoma clinics and other ophthalmology and optometry practices. However, the HFA is a large device that does not allow for examination outside the clinic and can be uncomfortable for patients with limited mobility.

This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients. The results of this study will potentially serve as pilot data for the design of a larger study that involves the full assessment of the VR headset and its VF test, based on various testing strategies.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Procedures:

1. Ophthalmic screening:

(a) Visual acuity, slit lamp exam, rebound tonometry (all subjects)
2. OCT examination of the study eye with the Topcon Maestro2 Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT):

(a) Standard Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer (RNFL), Optic Disc and Ganglion Cell Complex (GCC) scan patterns (i) Fundus photo is automatically obtained. (b) Abnormalities consistent with ophthalmic disease will be an exclusion for the healthy group of subjects. Reasonable and common artifacts that do not significantly impair the scan report will be accepted.

(c) OCT abnormalities consistent with glaucoma are expected on the 30 glaucoma subjects.
3. Once eligible, each patient will perform four (4) visual field tests:

(a) once with the HFA Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm (SITA) Standard 24-2 pattern (i) Reliability criteria: False Positives no higher than 15% (b) three tests with the VR headset: (i) two tests with ZEST strategy (ii) one test with gamified ZEST strategy (c) Counter-balancing will be used to determine the order of (a) and (b). In particular, a study participant will either start with the HFA visual field test and then proceed to the three tests with the VR headset; or, start with the three VR tests and finish with the HFA visual field test. The sequence of the visual field tests for each study ID will be provided by the sponsor.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

30 healthy subjects 30 glaucoma subjects
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy subjects

30 healthy subjects

Group Type OTHER

Perimetric test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients.

Glaucoma subjects

30 glaucoma patients, 10 mild, 10 moderate, 10 severe

Group Type OTHER

Perimetric test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Perimetric test

This study aims to evaluate a novel head-mounted perimeter against the HFA as an alternative method of VF testing. This new perimeter uses a Virtual Reality (VR) headset and a gamified version of VF testing to assess the visual function of healthy eyes and patients.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age range: 25-70 years
2. For normal subjects:

1. Patient is free of any current or prior ophthalmic pathologies that would potentially cause visual field defects: e.g. retina pathology, glaucoma, cataracts, keratoconus
2. No ocular surgery other than cataract surgery within 6 months prior to the study visit
3. For glaucoma subjects:

1. Patient has a diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma
2. Patient is free of any other current or prior ophthalmic pathologies that would potentially cause visual field defects.
3. No other ocular surgery other than glaucoma or cataract surgery within 6 months prior to the study visit
4. No IOP lower than 10 mm/Hg or higher than 30 mm/Hg
4. Refractive Error:

1. Sphere = up to -6.00 D to and up +3.00
2. Cylinder = up to -3.00 is common
5. No past refractive eye surgery
6. No Multifocal or phakic (ICLs) IOL; no multifocal CLs
7. One eligible eye
8. Ability to sit for standard VF bowl exam. Ability to wear VR perimetry headset device.
Minimum Eligible Age

25 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Illinois College of Optometry

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Envision Health Technologies, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Chaglasian, OD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Illinois College of Optometry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Illinois College of Optometry / Illinois Eye Institute

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Michael Chaglasian, OD

Role: CONTACT

312-949-7303

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michael Chaglasian, OD

Role: primary

312-949-7303

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Montesano G, Bryan SR, Crabb DP, Fogagnolo P, Oddone F, McKendrick AM, Turpin A, Lanzetta P, Perdicchi A, Johnson CA, Garway-Heath DF, Brusini P, Rossetti LM. A Comparison between the Compass Fundus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Ophthalmology. 2019 Feb;126(2):242-251. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30114416 (View on PubMed)

Marin-Franch I, Turpin A, Artes PH, Chong LX, McKendrick AM, Alawa KA, Wall M. The Open Perimetry Initiative: A framework for cross-platform development for the new generation of portable perimeters. J Vis. 2022 Apr 6;22(5):1. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.5.1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35385053 (View on PubMed)

Marin-Franch I, Swanson WH. The visualFields package: a tool for analysis and visualization of visual fields. J Vis. 2013 Mar 14;13(4):10. doi: 10.1167/13.4.10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23492926 (View on PubMed)

Bradley C, Ahmed IIK, Samuelson TW, Chaglasian M, Barnebey H, Radcliffe N, Bacharach J. Validation of a Wearable Virtual Reality Perimeter for Glaucoma Staging, The NOVA Trial: Novel Virtual Reality Field Assessment. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2024 Mar 1;13(3):10. doi: 10.1167/tvst.13.3.10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 38488433 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ENV1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.