Utility of Heidelberg Retina Tomograph in Monitoring Glaucoma Progression

NCT ID: NCT00424996

Last Updated: 2014-05-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

74 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Glaucoma is a chronic disease defined by characteristic changes in the optic nerve associated initially with loss of peripheral vision and is treated by lowering intraocular (inside the eye) pressure. It has been reported that noticeable changes to the optic nerve caused by glaucoma may occur several years before changes in vision are noticed. Since changes to the optic nerve and other eye structures due to glaucoma are irreversible, it is important to develop tools for the earliest possible detection of changes due to glaucoma.

The Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) is a device that is used to produce a three-dimensional map of the optic nerve and retina, and can be used to detect changes in the optic nerve and retina over time. In previous studies, it has been shown to be useful for the detection of changes due to glaucoma. However, the HRT when compared to other techniques to evaluate the optic nerve such as stereophotography, was found to only somewhat agree.

The current study will compare HRT to stereophotography to determine how good each one is at looking and documenting changes in the optic nerve over time due to glaucoma. Using HRT to initiate early topical medication or to change management requires knowing how well HRT results predict the development of visual loss. Accordingly, the results of this study may affect the management of glaucoma patients by optimizing the follow-up of people with this condition and by initiating appropriate and more individualized treatments. Early treatment is crucial for preventing further visual loss in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension (high pressure inside the eye).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In glaucoma, treatment decisions depend on the development of morphologic and functional damage. Therefore, damage serves as an indicator of management. Commonly, progression is determined by various perimetric techniques.

However, it has been reported that clinically detectable glaucomatous structural alteration of the ONH may precede the development of reproducible white on white and blue on yellow visual field defects by up to several years.

The HRT is a confocal scanning laser tomography device that creates a three-dimensional topographic analysis of the ONH and the peripapillary retina and includes a statistical analysis to evaluate structural change over time.

This technique showed good sensitivity and high specificity in detecting glaucoma progression when tested using computer simulation. The same good results were obtained by the same authors, in another study, in a small subgroup of 16 patients who were monitored for glaucomatous progression by both HRT and ONH stereophotographs for approximately 5.5 years.

However, in our recent retrospective study, our results demonstrated only fair agreement between HRT and clinical judgment of ONH stereophotographs for progression in glaucoma, for a mean follow-up time with HRT of 2.62 years. Although, the evaluation of the ONH stereophotographs is necessarily subjective, it is widely accepted and has been shown to be effective for evaluating change. Using the stereophotographs assessments as the "reference standard", the HRT sensitivity was 78% and the specificity to 70%. The positive predictive value of the HRT was 47.8%, while the negative predictive value was 90.3%.

According to the results of this study if the frequency of true positives and false positives does not change with longer follow-up, treatment decisions would be based on a test that may be in error 52.2% of the time.

Accordingly, our previous - and other studies - study demonstrated only fair agreement between HRT and clinical judgment of ONH stereophotographs for progression in glaucoma. At present, the available evidence does not appear to be sufficient to show that the addition of HRT improves the ability to predict the development of clinical optic disc change and/or visual field loss.

Therefore the aim of the current study is to investigate the clinical significance of the HRT in monitoring glaucoma progression. In other words we will investigate how well HRT results for glaucomatous progression are able to predict the future development of optic disc and/or visual field changes in patients with OHT and glaucoma.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Glaucoma Ocular Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better
* Subjects determined to have OHT or glaucoma
* Spherical refraction within 6.0 D with plus or minus sphere, and cylinder within 3.0 D with plus or minus cylinder
* Subjects that show progression on the HRT
* subjects stable on ONH stereophotographs
* subjects with stable and reliable visual fields
* Subjects willing to make the required visits for the study
* Subjects tolerant to dilating drops

Exclusion Criteria

* A suspicion or actual defect in the visual field of the eye being tested that is explained by the patient's ocular status or history, other than glaucoma
* Any history of disease or use of medication that may affect visual field reliability
* Past history of stroke or diabetic retinopathy
* Inability of the pupils to be dilated to at least 4 mm for the screening visit
* Inability to undergo either perimetry test or the ophthalmic examination
* Inability to undergo adequate or better quality stereophotographs
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Glaucoma Research Society of Canada

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Health Network, Toronto

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Graham E Trope

DR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yvonne Buys, MD, FRCSC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology; Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Graham E Trope, PhD, FRCSC

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology; Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

John Flanagan, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

University of Toronto, Department of Ophthalmology; Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Toronto; Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kourkoutas D, Buys YM, Flanagan JG, Hatch WV, Balian C, Trope GE. Comparison of glaucoma progression evaluated with Heidelberg retina tomograph II versus optic nerve head stereophotographs. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb;42(1):82-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17361246 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UHNToronto

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optical Angiography in Glaucoma
NCT02548676 COMPLETED
Sleep at 30 Degrees in Glaucoma
NCT00802061 COMPLETED NA
Eye Pressure Lowering Surgery
NCT01931904 RECRUITING